Hi,
for what reason ever, my attempts to install a bootloader
for my new system fails.
Current setup:
Partioning:
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 1.0.5
Partition table scan:
MBR: protective
BSD: not present
APM: not present
GPT: present
Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.
Di
On Friday, April 3, 2020 10:42 AM, Caveman Al Toraboran
wrote:
> nullmailer is now configured, and test with`echo "Subject: ..." | sendmail -v
> m...@dom.com` works. but, smartd's test mail is not working, with this error:
>
> Apr 03 10:15:09 blah smartd[219171]: Test of to m...@dom.com produc
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 06:49:08AM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I am afraid most (if not all) ISPs will reject emails if the reverse DNS does
> not match. Using a dynamic range is another "spam" indicator and will also
> get your emails blocked by (nearly) all ISPs.
>
> I would suggest putting you
Meino,
On Tuesday, 2020-04-07 11:32:09 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> This was created via
> grub-install --efi-directory=/boot/efi
> grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
According to the notes I took when installing Gentoo for the first time
I did:
# echo 'GRUB_PLATFORMS="efi-64"' >> /etc/p
I have a long standing "gpg can't check signature: No public key"
error while running # emerge-webrsync
It appears because the webrsync-gpg feature has been set in my
make.conf however I do not want to switch it off.
The app-crypt/gentoo-keys is installed, so it is not the reason for above error.
I
How can I change /bin/sh in a per package way using /etc/portage/env?
I need to set bash some packages while I run dash for the system.
On 07/04/20 11:32, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
When I boot this setup, grub starts and displays:
booting Linux 5051500-64-RT ...
and freezes. I have to powercycle the whole thing.
If you're getting there, your firmware was successful in loading GRUB
from your system partition, so you can pr
On 07/04/2020 00:38, Michael wrote:
Perhaps older UEFI specifications allowed Mac-baked filesystems, or perhaps
Apple were/are doing their own thing. The current UEFI specification
*requires* a FAT 12/16/32 filesystem type on an ESP partition to boot an OS
image/bootloader from - see section '1
On Tuesday, 7 April 2020 04:54:25 BST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2020-04-06 22:14, Dale wrote:
> > I have DSL and it isn't to fast to begin with. At
> > times tho, I'm only getting about 20 or 30% of what I should.
>
> Are you often on the phone at those times? May it be poor filtering?
>
> At m
On 4/7/20 11:13 AM, Alessandro Barbieri wrote:
> How can I change /bin/sh in a per package way using /etc/portage/env?
> I need to set bash some packages while I run dash for the system.
If it's the ./configure script failing, you can set
CONFIG_SHELL="/bin/bash"
to override it only in that co
On Tuesday, 7 April 2020 05:55:06 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:54:25 AM CEST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 2020-04-06 22:14, Dale wrote:
> > > I have DSL and it isn't to fast to begin with. At
> > > times tho, I'm only getting about 20 or 30% of what I should.
> >
> > Are y
On Tuesday, 7 April 2020 06:56:04 BST Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:54:25 AM CEST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> >> On 2020-04-06 22:14, Dale wrote:
> >>> I have DSL and it isn't to fast to begin with. At
> >>> times tho, I'm only getting about 20 or 30% of what I shoul
This thread has been covered in depth for a while now, but I noticed something
noteworthy.
On Monday, 6 April 2020 19:13:06 BST Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> "Michael Orlitzky" , 06.04.2020, 19:35:
> > On 4/6/20 1:32 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> The messages were missing due to the MX being unavailabl
On 04/07 05:18, Andrea Conti wrote:
> On 07/04/20 11:32, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > When I boot this setup, grub starts and displays:
> >
> > booting Linux 5051500-64-RT ...
> >
> > and freezes. I have to powercycle the whole thing.
>
> If you're getting there, your firmware was successf
On 4/7/20 1:10 PM, Michael wrote:
>
> Perhaps the order in which recipients servers parse the headers cause the
> DKIM
> check to fail?
>
DKIM fails on many mailing lists. This list, for example, modifies your
subject to add "[gentoo user]" but leaves the DKIM signature intact. If
the sender h
"Michael" , 07.04.2020, 19:10:
> This thread has been covered in depth for a while now, but I noticed something
> noteworthy.
> On Monday, 6 April 2020 19:13:06 BST Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
>>
>> And here's an example for J. Roeleveld's observed missed original
>> messages:
>>
>> A few days ago I
I already filed bugs here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/716504
https://bugs.gentoo.org/716496
I need the workaround for the two above plus this
https://bugs.gentoo.org/714094
Il Mar 7 Apr 2020, 18:10 Michael Orlitzky ha scritto:
> On 4/7/20 11:13 AM, Alessandro Barbieri wrote:
> > How can I change
On 4/7/20 2:48 PM, Alessandro Barbieri wrote:
> I already filed bugs here:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/716504
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/716496
>
> I need the workaround for the two above plus
> this https://bugs.gentoo.org/714094
>
Thanks, this will be a PITA for a while (again). Another develo
"Michael Orlitzky" , 07.04.2020, 20:34:
> Blaming lists.gentoo.org (or any other MTA) for not retrying after a 4xx
> without evidence is seeing hoof prints and thinking zebras. Ockham's
> razor: you fucked up.
I'm watching my exim logs right now and can confirm that the
gentoo mailing list server
On 4/7/20 2:54 PM, Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
>
>> DKIM fails on many mailing lists. This list, for example, modifies your
>> subject to add "[gentoo user]" but leaves the DKIM signature intact. If
>> the sender has a p=reject DMARC policy, that can make his messages
>> "disappear" for recipients who
> rc.log stops here:
>
> * Executing: /lib/rc/sh/openrc-run.sh /lib/rc/sh/openrc-run.sh
> /etc/init.d/local start
> * Starting local ...
> [ ok ]
So apparently it's booting all the way...
Looking at my working config (asus x370 prime, ryzen 7 1700, UEFI boot
from an NVMe SSD), you might want
On 2020-04-07, Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 April 2020 05:55:06 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:54:25 AM CEST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> > On 2020-04-06 22:14, Dale wrote:
>> > > I have DSL and it isn't to fast to begin with. At
>> > > times tho, I'm only getting about 20 or
On 7 April 2020 21:40:56 CEST, Grant Edwards wrote:
>On 2020-04-07, Michael wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 7 April 2020 05:55:06 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:54:25 AM CEST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>>> > On 2020-04-06 22:14, Dale wrote:
>>> > > I have DSL and it isn't to fast to begi
J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> The only time I have seen DSL work without a filter is when the modem is
> connected directly to the incoming port and no analog device can be connected
> anywhere in the line.
>
> That location gets 60meg down and 20meg up.
>
> I am also 100÷ certain noone can connect an
Hi,
I have opened a bug for this [1], but am not sure, how the stabilization
policies are, and are point to this list.
To quote from the bug report:
> I'm not sure if this a bug, but as far as I know on a stable system such
> packages should fit together. Currently, app-backup/borgbackup needs
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM Alessandro Barbieri
wrote:
>
> I already filed bugs here:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/716504
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/716496
>
> I need the workaround for the two above plus this
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/714094
In the future, please mention you are using dash as
On 7/4/20 5:15 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:02:04 +0100, antlists wrote:
This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still
have an ext? /boot.
This isn't true at all - you've got the cart before the horse. The
original (U)EFI spec comes from Sun, I believe,
On 4/6/20 10:49 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I am afraid most (if not all) ISPs will reject emails if the reverse
DNS does not match.
My experience has been that there needs to be something for both the
forward and reverse DNS. Hopefully they match each other and — and what
I call — round resolve
On 4/7/20 4:53 AM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
Grant's mail server, I assume, is configured with the highest security
in mind, so I can see how a mail server with a dynamic I.P. could
cause issues in some contexts.
I don't do any checking to see if the IP is from a dynamic net block or
not. Some peo
29 matches
Mail list logo
