On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:19, Franz Fellner wrote:
>
> That article you linked to is about a variant of linux, "rt". And as it looks
> they didn't update their branch since the release of 4.19.100-r41.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/log/?h=v4.19-rt
> linux
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:23 PM Matt Connell wrote:
>
> On 2020-02-06 11:40, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > 5.4 has just become the newest LTS.
>
> I see that now. But my original question still stands as to why the
> stable version of gentoo-sources is consistently a few versions behind
> the latest L
That doesn't apply to the kernel.
4.19.97 got tagged on January 17.
January 18. it was stable on amd64 and x86 - one day instead of 30.
Here is the stabilization request: https://bugs.gentoo.org/705006
There were some issues and changes to the targeted versions.
Am Fr., 7. Feb. 2020 um 19:18 Uhr
I'll start by saying that I appreciate all the work the Gentoo developers
do, and by no means have any animosity for them for this,
Here's an example of how 4.19.97 being stabilized might have exposed users
to functionality breaking bugs: https://bugs.gentoo.org/706036
Took me several hours to fi
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:34 PM Michael Jones wrote:
>
> Here's an example of how 4.19.97 being stabilized might have exposed users to
> functionality breaking bugs: https://bugs.gentoo.org/706036
>
> Honestly I'd rather see the 30 day stabilization policy apply to LTS kernels
> vs. being stabili
Hi. Well, I have run into a problem on the world update I am about to
do? Firefox requires libvpx-1.7.0 and handbrake wants 8.x. Now
there is a use flag systemlibvpx which is enabled, I am assuming if I
disable that the great God of portage will let me continue with my
update -- any reason why
6 matches
Mail list logo
