can any one suggest flags for the make.conf file, i'm trying to build on an hp
dl585 g7 with 4 amd 6180se, 12 core, cpu world says k10 microarchetecture,
Maranello platform.
When this works, I'll be upgrading to 6380 CPUs. All help appreciated.
"We the People Dare to Create a More Perfect Uni
Hi,
I am playing around with "Meshroom" -- an OpenSource software able to
create 3D-objects for Blender for example by scanning a bunch of
photos.
But...
Meshroom expects exspects image file to be dropped onto a certain
place of its gui...to make it really easy to use.
There is no "import" or "op
On 3/8/19 7:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> So I ran "layman -d ALL" followed by "layman -a palemoon". Now...
>
> [i660][root][~] cat /var/lib/layman/palemoon/profiles/repo_name
> palemoon
>
> ... but I still get the same warning! Some more info...
>
Apologies, if this a stupid question ..
Hi!
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:51:22 +0100 (CET)
mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> can any one suggest flags for the make.conf file, i'm trying to build on an
> hp dl585 g7 with 4 amd 6180se, 12 core, cpu world says k10 microarchetecture,
> Maranello platform.
>
> When this works, I'll be
According to GCC :
CPUs based on AMD Family 10h cores with x86-64 instruction set support.
(This supersets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, enhanced 3DNow!,
ABM and 64-bit instruction set extensions.)
Best way to get that info :
( simplest way ) cat /proc/cpuinfo
( long form ) gcc -c -Q -marc
I originally had...
[palemoon]
priority = 50
location = /var/lib/layman/palemoon
layman-type = git
auto-sync = No
I ran "layman -S"; no difference. I copied your config, ran "layman -S"
and now I get...
=
[i660][root][~
Thank you both, I knew there was a command. Did get it working with flags for
similar processor but obviously the goal is to optimize for the hardware i
have. Just couldn't remember how you got the cpu flags.
If you like computers that sound like a pile of angry hair dryers servers are a
re
On 06/03/2019 14:39, Mick wrote:
To date I have not found, or cannot recall, an occasion where revdep-rebuild
rebuilt anything following a run of @preserved-rebuild. I have stopped
running revdep-rebuild.sh for years now thinking it is redundant.
@preserved-rebuild is only able to detect cases
In trying to emerge chromium I received an error msg saying that
net-libs/nodejs needed the "inspector" USE flag.
I added
>=net-libs/nodejs-8.12.0 inspector
to
/etc/portage/package.use chromium
Now I receive the msg
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy ">=net-libs/nodejs-7.6.0[inspecto
On 10/03/2019 00:24, allan gottlieb wrote:
The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
inspector? ( icu )
The above constraints are a subset of the following complete expression:
python_targets_python2_7 inspector? ( icu ssl ) npm? ( ssl )
This seems more seriou
On Saturday, 9 March 2019 20:04:46 GMT Walter Dnes wrote:
> I originally had...
>
> [palemoon]
> priority = 50
> location = /var/lib/layman/palemoon
> layman-type = git
> auto-sync = No
>
> I ran "layman -S"; no difference. I copied your config, ran "layman -S"
> and now I get...
>
> ===
My apologies for wasting everybody's time. I think that I
misinterpreted https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Layman and did a mix of the
config method for both version 2.1.0 and later as well as versions prior
to 2.1.0 Needless to say, the system was badly confused.
I removed all overlays, unmerged
Just as a test set the 'icu inspector' USE FLAGS for net-libs/nodejs,
Then try this command, it should show how many packages would be pulled
in and their USE FLAGS :
emerge -pvt net-libs/nodejs
On 3/9/19 4:24 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> In trying to emerge chromium I received an error msg saying
I updated Ssh yesterday :
net-misc/openssh
Available versions: 7.5_p1-r4 7.7_p1-r9^t 7.9_p1-r4^t {X X509 audit bindist
debug (+)hpn kerberos ldap ldns libedit libressl livecd pam +pie sctp selinux
skey ssh1 +ssl static test ABI_MIPS="n32" KERNEL="linux"}
Installed versions: 7.9_p1-r4^t([
14 matches
Mail list logo
