Hi,
cmake is still a mystery to me.
I like to add a (non-Gentoo) package to my local overlay.
This package is configured and built by 'cmake'
It needs and finds a package 'mumps' (from the Science Overlay)
but linkage fails since the 'mumps' library needs another library
(scalapack)
So, ho
Is this possible to install your packages locally in your home folder? This
approach works better if you have to work on different machines.
HTH
Hung
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cmake is still a mystery to me.
>
> I like to add a (non-Gentoo) package to m
Hi,
I'd like to recommend a Linux distribution to someone who needs an as
simple Linux distribution as possible.
Since I am going to help that person from time to time, it should be as
similar as possible to Gentoo.
Which distribution would you recommend.
Many thanks from your suggestions,
On 11/23/2017 06:07:39 PM, Hung Dang wrote:
Is this possible to install your packages locally in your home
folder? This
approach works better if you have to work on different machines.
HTH
Hung
Yes, but how does this help. Cmake doesn't link to libscalapack and
therefore fails.
On Thu,
On 11/23/2017 12:11 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to recommend a Linux distribution to someone who needs an as
simple Linux distribution as possible.
Since I am going to help that person from time to time, it should be
as similar as possible to Gentoo.
Which distribution would you
Below are approaches that I would suggest if you want to go for the local
solution:
1. Use brewlinux to install mumps. I assume brew will pull all required
dependencies. This approach works well for me in different servers.
2. Compile mumps and it dependencies locally. You need to play around wit
On 23/11/17 19:11, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to recommend a Linux distribution to someone who needs an as
simple Linux distribution as possible.
Since I am going to help that person from time to time, it should be as
similar as possible to Gentoo.
Which distribution would you recom
Hello,
Firstly, you should file a bug, but that might not get it working as
quickly as you'd like.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cmake is still a mystery to me.
>
> I like to add a (non-Gentoo) package to my local overlay.
> This package is configured and bu
On 23 November 2017 at 18:45, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 23/11/17 19:11, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to recommend a Linux distribution to someone who needs an as
>> simple Linux distribution as possible.
>> Since I am going to help that person from time to time, it should be
On 23/11/17 18:45, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 23/11/17 19:11, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to recommend a Linux distribution to someone who needs an as
>> simple Linux distribution as possible.
>> Since I am going to help that person from time to time, it should be
>> as similar
David Haller wrote:
>
> Mow is that meson_options.txt
> maintained? Automatically or by hand? If the former: yay!
No, the former would be bad since it would require an
analogue of an "autoreconf" run which is what meson avoids.
> If the latter, treat it as non-existant...
I think you misunderst
Earlier versions ok and 4.14.1 has the fix
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/22/linux_4_14_bcache_bug_destroys_data/
Package P bypasses applying user patches (by not calling
default_src_prepare). I have patches I need to apply to P, and in this
case I really don't want to fork the ebuild. So, I'm hell bent on
doing it the hacky way with /etc/portage/bashrc (which, IIRC, I have
been told on this list not to do,
On 11/23/2017 08:12 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Package P bypasses applying user patches (by not calling
> default_src_prepare). I have patches I need to apply to P, and in this
> case I really don't want to fork the ebuild. So, I'm hell bent on
> doing it the hacky way with /etc/portage/bashrc (w
On 24/11/17 00:01, Wols Lists wrote:
On 23/11/17 18:45, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 23/11/17 19:11, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I'd like to recommend a Linux distribution to someone who needs an as
simple Linux distribution as possible.
Since I am going to help that person from time to time, it sho
I think that I will recommend Void Linux to you.
The reasons are as follows :
1. rolling release as Gentoo and Arch.
2. use runit as init system.
3. Its package manager, xbps, is easy and quick to install/update/remove
software.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 24
On 2017-11-23 18:11, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I'd like to recommend a Linux distribution to someone who needs an as
> simple Linux distribution as possible.
> Since I am going to help that person from time to time, it should be
> as similar as possible to Gentoo.
"simple" has multiple meanings.
On 2017.11.23 20:47, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 24/11/17 00:01, Wols Lists wrote:
On 23/11/17 18:45, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 23/11/17 19:11, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I'd like to recommend a Linux distribution to someone who needs an
as
simple Linux distribution as possible.
Since I am g
18 matches
Mail list logo
