Re: [gentoo-user] mysql upgrade 5.5 > 5.6 mysql_upgrade needed?

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Marko Weber | 8000 wrote: > > hello list, > again i have to ask. > Do i need to run mysql_upgrade after upgrading mysql 5.5 > 5.6 ? > I ask because the post install text recommend this after an major upgrade. > On the Mysql Website is a major upgrade 5.5 > 6.0, n

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

> On Apr 1, 2015, at 2:46, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:37:06 +0200 waben...@gmail.com wrote: >> This really made my day. :-) >> >> https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html > > The best design ever! So nice and readable font, so yummy > background, very f

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

Dale wrote: > Gevisz wrote: >> It did not load from the first try for me. Than it take some time to >> load from the second attempt. A really awful blue background. The >> quote from the site: “We accept that members in more fortunate >> circumstances may feel that a site with a 16-colour palette a

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

Am Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:05:50 -0600 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés : [...] > With systemd you don't need this, since it can track the real state of its > services thanks to cgroups. And kill *really* kills all the processes > associated to a service, something that OpenRC, by design, cannot do. [...]

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Marc Joliet wrote: > > Am Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:05:50 -0600 > schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés : > > [...] > > With systemd you don't need this, since it can track the real state of its > > services thanks to cgroups. And kill *really* kills all the processes > > associate

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 02:04:05 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > """ > # If you have cgroups turned on in your kernel, this switch controls > # whether or not a group for each controller is mounted under > # /sys/fs/cgroup. > [...] > # Set this to YES if yu want all of the processes in a service's

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

Am Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:43:21 +0100 schrieb Peter Humphrey : > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 02:04:05 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > > """ > > # If you have cgroups turned on in your kernel, this switch controls > > # whether or not a group for each controller is mounted under > > # /sys/fs/cgroup. >

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

Am 01.04.2015 um 10:04 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Marc Joliet > wrote: > > > > Am Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:05:50 -0600 > > schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés >: > > > > [...] > > > With systemd you don't need this, since it ca

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

I love the serial console style cursor sweep across the screen. Ahh that takes me back.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

On 31 March 2015 at 23:10, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +0100, Bob Wya wrote: > >@Nicolas, > >I think I'm getting it now. The patchsets are cumulative and I just > >need the base patchset - right? > > base, extras and experimental are all applied. > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:57:33 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Btw, if you need a 'cheat sheet' for INIT the whole thing is broken > beyond repair. You don't *need* it, it's just a convenience when switching from one syntax to the other. The order of the switch doesn't matter, the notes would

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:53:39 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote: > Anyway, I've finally gotten around to putting together a short > cheatsheet @ https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/OpenRC_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet . Nice! Apart from the zap thing that Canek has already covered, I think it could be useful. Could you a

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:57:33 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > Btw, if you need a 'cheat sheet' for INIT the whole thing is broken > > beyond repair. > > You don't *need* it, it's just a convenience when switching from one > syntax to

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 01:31:12 -0500, Dale wrote: > It worked the first time but it is quite a bit slower for me. I got DSL > now and other pages, even those with pics, load faster. Sort of odd. Slow drawing speed (not loading) is part of the CGA spec. -- Neil Bothwick Pepperami. Its a bit of

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 10:53:15 Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:43:21 +0100 > > schrieb Peter Humphrey : > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 02:04:05 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > > """ > > > # If you have cgroups turned on in your kernel, this switch controls > > > # whether or not a

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

Am 01.04.2015 um 09:18 schrieb Matti Nykyri: >> On Apr 1, 2015, at 2:46, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:37:06 +0200 waben...@gmail.com wrote: >>> This really made my day. :-) >>> >>> https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html >> The best design ever! So nice a

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:34:04 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Nice. The load time is really fast :) Send the floppies to me. Can't > > wait to get installing ;) > > I'd prefer tape... Magnetic or punched? -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 25: New York culture pgpIEfFKuLC5C.pgp D

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

Am 01.04.2015 um 11:36 schrieb Neil Bothwick: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:34:04 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >>> Nice. The load time is really fast :) Send the floppies to me. Can't >>> wait to get installing ;) >> I'd prefer tape... > Magnetic or punched? > > magnetic. My guinea pigs tend t

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 20:10:44 Adam Carter wrote: > I love the serial console style cursor sweep across the screen. Ahh that > takes me back. Me too. I was just trying to remember the type number of the serial consoles we used. No joy so far, but then it was 30 years ago. -- Rgds Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

Am 01.04.2015 um 11:22 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Neil Bothwick > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:57:33 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > > > Btw, if you need a 'cheat sheet' for INIT the whole thing is broken > > > beyond

Re: [gentoo-user] Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

Sorry folks - I guess I've made a right "dogs dinner" of this whole thread... I'll make more efforts not to be "that noob" next time :-) But I've got the information I needed about how to build old gentoo-sources kernels. So thanks! I've done my tests and the outcome is: 3.8.8 (gentoo-sources -

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 10:36:59 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:34:04 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > Nice. The load time is really fast :) Send the floppies to me. Can't > > > wait to get installing ;) > > > > I'd prefer tape... > > Magnetic or punched? Ooh, the tempt

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:39:23 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> I'd prefer tape... > > Magnetic or punched? > > > > > > magnetic. My guinea pigs tend to eat punch cards&tape. But punched can survive an EMP, which is more likely here as I don't anticipate an invasion of domesticated rode

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:40:29 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Magnetic or punched? > > Ooh, the temptation! What's the best way of cleaning tea from a monitor? -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 29: Soft rock pgp9s5_Y2bsRR.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 10:51:25 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:40:29 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Magnetic or punched? > > > > Ooh, the temptation! > > What's the best way of cleaning tea from a monitor? :) Actually, I've just been looking at the spoof site again. Someo

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 10:58:58 I wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 10:51:25 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:40:29 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > Magnetic or punched? > > > > > > Ooh, the temptation! > > > > What's the best way of cleaning tea from a monitor? > : > :)

Re: [gentoo-user] xen on new install reboots by itself

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:52 AM, symack wrote: > Hello Hydra, > > > Thank you for your response: > > The commands are bellow. Also, the Bios is almost 10 years old on the > machine. > Not sure if that info helps for the ACPI related messages. > > USE="app-emulation/xen-tools-4.3.1-r1 api hvm qenu

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 20:10:44 Adam Carter wrote: >> I love the serial console style cursor sweep across the screen. Ahh that >> takes me back. > Me too. > > I was just trying to remember the type number of the serial consoles we > used. No joy so far, but then it was

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On 01/04/15 18:15, Dale wrote: > Peter Humphrey wrote: >> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 20:10:44 Adam Carter wrote: >>> I love the serial console style cursor sweep across the screen. Ahh that >>> takes me back. >> Me too. >> >> I was just trying to remember the type number of the serial consoles we

Re: [gentoo-user] xen on new install reboots by itself

Hello Hydra, I'm totally new to Xen and was following this tutorial very compressed tutorial https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Xen I purchased the machine as the test machine to see how stable/secure I can get Xen doms to run on it. Should I change the profile and reinstall xen/xen-tools N ​

[gentoo-user] Re: Easy (cough) way to build earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel?

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:17:45AM +0100, Bob Wya wrote: >The experimental patchset is only applied if the experimental USE flag >is enabled surely?? >See I'm learning stuff now! :-) https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/metadata.xml?revisi

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 05:15:53 Dale wrote: > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 20:10:44 Adam Carter wrote: > >> I love the serial console style cursor sweep across the screen. Ahh > >> that > >> takes me back. > > > > Me too. > > > > I was just trying to remember the type

[gentoo-user] Hungry firefox

Hello list, Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, even while it's not supposed to be doing anything? This is version 31.5.3, with just AdBlock Plus and YesScript added. I have remerged it and saw no difference. [ebuild R] www-client/firefox-31.5.3::gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > # If you have cgroups turned on in your kernel, this switch controls > # whether or not a group for each controller is mounted under > # /sys/fs/cgroup. > [...] > # Set this to YES if yu want all of the processes in a service's cgroup >

Re: [gentoo-user] Hungry firefox

On 04/01/2015 07:03 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, even > while it's not supposed to be doing anything? This is version 31.5.3, with > just AdBlock Plus and YesScript added. I have remerged it and saw no > differ

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On 04/01/2015 12:18 AM, Matti Nykyri wrote: > Nice. The load time is really fast :) Send the floppies to me. Can't wait to > get installing ;) Ditto! I can finally dust off my 5.25" drive and use it for something! ;-) Dan

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On 04/01/2015 02:21 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:53:39 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote: > >> Anyway, I've finally gotten around to putting together a short >> cheatsheet @ https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/OpenRC_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet . > > Nice! Apart from the zap thing that Canek has a

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On 04/01/2015 02:21 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Nice! Apart from the zap thing that Canek has already covered, I think it > could be useful. Could you add a link to it to the main systemd page. I've added it to the "See Also" section at the end of the Systemd page. I didn't know where else to put i

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

> On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:58, Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 10:51:25 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:40:29 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: Magnetic or punched? >>> >>> Ooh, the temptation! >> >> What's the best way of cleaning tea from a monitor? > > :) >

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

Am 01.04.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Matti Nykyri: > How can I play the great new game on the site? Firefox just tries to search > the page when I press A or Q? Am I using an unsupported browser? Should I try > WorldWideWeb-browser? Is it in portage? In Firefox go to "Settings -> Advanced" and turn o

[gentoo-user] Re: Hungry firefox

On 2015-04-01, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, even > while it's not supposed to be doing anything? This is version 31.5.3, with > just AdBlock Plus and YesScript added. I have remerged it and saw no > difference. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Hungry firefox

150401 Peter Humphrey wrote: > Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, > even while it's not supposed to be doing anything? Occasionally, I've had javascripts running away with the CPU, which stops when I kill FF & restart it. That's just bad JS programming. -- ===

[gentoo-user] Re: Hungry firefox

Peter Humphrey prh.myzen.co.uk> writes: > > Hello list, > > Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, even > while it's not supposed to be doing anything? This is version 31.5.3, with > just AdBlock Plus and YesScript added. I have remerged it and saw no > differe

Re: [gentoo-user] Hungry firefox

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 11:34:19 Philip Webb wrote: > 150401 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, > > even while it's not supposed to be doing anything? > > Occasionally, I've had javascripts running away with the CPU, > which stops whe

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

> On Apr 1, 2015, at 18:29, Heiko Baums wrote: > >> Am 01.04.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Matti Nykyri: >> >> How can I play the great new game on the site? Firefox just tries to search >> the page when I press A or Q? Am I using an unsupported browser? Should I >> try WorldWideWeb-browser? Is it in

Re: [gentoo-user] xen on new install reboots by itself

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:52 PM, symack wrote: > Hello Hydra, > > I'm totally new to Xen and was following this tutorial very compressed > tutorial https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Xen > I purchased the machine as the test machine to see how stable/secure I can > get Xen doms to run on it. > > Should

Re: [gentoo-user] Hungry firefox

150401 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 11:34:19 Philip Webb wrote: >> 150401 Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, >>> even while it's not supposed to be doing anything? >> Occasionally, I've had javascripts running away w

Re: [gentoo-user] xen on new install reboots by itself

Hello Hydra, Thank you so much. I was literally about to use the default profile and reinstall the same versions. If I need to go back in time, which version is considered Stable and not too old for xen and xen-tools. Finally, as I am new to gentoo, can you please tell me how to emerge an older xe

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:19:18 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote: > > Nice! Apart from the zap thing that Canek has already covered, I > > think it could be useful. Could you add a link to it to the main > > systemd page. > > I've added it to the "See Also" section at the end of the Systemd page. > I didn

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:19:57 +0300, Matti Nykyri wrote: > How can I play the great new game on the site? Firefox just tries to > search the page when I press A or Q? Am I using an unsupported browser? > Should I try WorldWideWeb-browser? Is it in portage? I think it only runs on Mosaic and IE1. M

Re: [gentoo-user] Hungry firefox

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:34:19 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: > > Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, > > even while it's not supposed to be doing anything? > > Occasionally, I've had javascripts running away with the CPU, > which stops when I kill FF & restart it. Th

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:28:03 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:19:57 +0300, Matti Nykyri wrote: > > > How can I play the great new game on the site? Firefox just tries to > > search the page when I press A or Q? Am I using an unsupported > > browser? Should I try WorldWideWeb-bro

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

Am Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:29:15 +0100 schrieb Peter Humphrey : > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 10:53:15 Marc Joliet wrote: > > Am Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:43:21 +0100 > > [...] > > Apparently it's (partially) due to CONFIG_GENTOO_LINUX_PORTAGE (not > > CONFIG_GENTOO_LINUX_INIT_SCRIPT as I originally thought

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On 04/01/2015 09:26 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:19:18 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote: >> I've added it to the "See Also" section at the end of the Systemd page. >> I didn't know where else to put it. > > That's where I was thinking of. It's not there right now, are edits > moderate

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc->systemd command comparison

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > > # If you have cgroups turned on in your kernel, this switch controls > > # whether or not a group for each controller is mounted under > > # /sys/fs/cgroup. > > [...] > > # Set

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:14:55 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 30/03/2015 12:42, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:14:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > >>> OK, then so why do I have to edit files to tell the system to USE > >>> this and that after the system tells me it needs

Re: [gentoo-user] Hungry firefox

Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, > even while it's not supposed to be doing anything? This is version > 31.5.3, with just AdBlock Plus and YesScript added. I have remerged > it and saw no difference. > > [ebuild R

Re: [gentoo-user] This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:31:15 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:02:23 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > > >> Hmm ... I don't think setting abi_x86_32 globally is necessary, > > >> unless you want to have 32bit libs for ALL packages that these > > >> exist for, whether you u

Re: [gentoo-user] This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:31:15 +0100 > Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:02:23 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> >> > >> Hmm ... I don't think setting abi_x86_32 globally is necessary, >> > >> unless you want to have 32bit

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On 03/30/2015 02:52 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > > I was also wondering if there might a way for emerge to show you which > packages have USE flags enabled that aren't required by any dependent > package: it would be sort of like "emerge --depclean" but for USE > flags instead of packages themselves

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: External HDD: sector size incorrectly detected on first connect

Am Sun, 22 Mar 2015 14:28:09 +0100 schrieb Marc Joliet : > Am Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:04:05 +0100 > schrieb Marc Joliet : > > [...] > > OK, I'll follow up there, then. > > I finally did that, now that I tested with vanilla-sources-3.19.2. See for > example http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.ge

[gentoo-user] Re: Hungry firefox

On 2015-04-01, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:34:19 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: > >> > Has anyone else here noticed firefox consuming 15% or so of CPU time, >> > even while it's not supposed to be doing anything? >> >> Occasionally, I've had javascripts running away with the CPU, >>

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Strange behaviour of google certificates.

2015-04-01 19:19 GMT+02:00 Gevisz : > This question does specifically relates to Gentoo distribution > but, as far as I have not subscribed to any other mailing list, > I dare to ask it here. > > So, I am using Claws Mail that downloads e-mails from several > google mail accounts (all are mine :) a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Please explain X fonts?

Urs Schütz writes: > On 03/29/15 06:23, lee wrote: >> walt writes: >> >>> On 03/26/2015 07:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: >>> >>> >>> >> >> As to fonts, I highly recommend "Source Code Pro" and "Source Sans Pro". >> They finally resolved my long search for good fonts. Unfortunately, >> they don't c

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

Bill Kenworthy wrote: > On 01/04/15 18:15, Dale wrote: >> Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 20:10:44 Adam Carter wrote: I love the serial console style cursor sweep across the screen. Ahh that takes me back. >>> Me too. >>> >>> I was just trying to remember the type num

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo announces total website makeover :-)

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 01:31:12 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> It worked the first time but it is quite a bit slower for me. I got DSL >> now and other pages, even those with pics, load faster. Sort of odd. > > Slow drawing speed (not loading) is part of the CGA spec. > > Maybe it wa

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Strange behaviour of google certificates.

Gevisz wrote: > This question does specifically relates to Gentoo distribution > but, as far as I have not subscribed to any other mailing list, > I dare to ask it here. > > So, I am using Claws Mail that downloads e-mails from several > google mail accounts (all are mine :) and about once or tw

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On 01.04.2015 19:28, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: Big advantage of automatic deps over --autounmask is that auto deps would not mess with user configuration files in /etc. Changed USE flags would be stored internally by portage. Ok, but then you need a database (another file in /etc/portage/) for

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Strange behaviour of google certificates.

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:41:55 +0200 Mickaël Bucas wrote: > 2015-04-01 19:19 GMT+02:00 Gevisz : Correction: This question does *not* specifically relates to Gentoo distribution > > but, as far as I have not subscribed to any other mailing list, > > I dare to ask it here. > > > > So, I am us

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Strange behaviour of google certificates.

On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 04:17:40 +0200 wrote: > Gevisz wrote: > > > This question does specifically relates to Gentoo distribution > > but, as far as I have not subscribed to any other mailing list, > > I dare to ask it here. > > > > So, I am using Claws Mail that downloads e-mails from several > >

Re: [gentoo-user] xen on new install reboots by itself

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:24 PM, symack wrote: > Hello Hydra, > > Thank you so much. I was literally about to use the default profile and > reinstall the same > versions. If I need to go back in time, which version is considered Stable > and not too old > for xen and xen-tools. Finally, as I am ne

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 06:42:49 +0200 Sebastian Beßler wrote: > On 01.04.2015 19:28, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > > > Big advantage of automatic deps over --autounmask is that auto deps > > would not mess with user configuration files in /etc. Changed USE > > flags would be stored internally by porta

Re: [gentoo-user] This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:05:28 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Róbert Čerňanský > wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:31:15 +0100 > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:02:23 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hmm ... I don't think setting

Re: [gentoo-user] xen on new install reboots by itself

On Monday, March 30, 2015 07:07:39 PM symack wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > New install, on a old server with raid 10 scsi... The normal installation > works fine, > the only thing is when we try to boot with xen, it gets to the prompt and > then reboots > by itself. The following message is what di