On 03/17/2015 10:20 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> The cheat sheets are useful for reference, but I'd strongly encourage
> anybody using systemd to get a decent understanding of the
> fundamentals.
Oh, certainly - but going in completely blind and being stuck for 15
minutes trying to do a simple task s
On Mar 31, 2015 7:55 PM, "Daniel Frey" wrote:
>
> On 03/17/2015 10:20 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > The cheat sheets are useful for reference, but I'd strongly encourage
> > anybody using systemd to get a decent understanding of the
> > fundamentals.
>
> Oh, certainly - but going in completely blind
On 03/31/2015 07:05 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> Thanks for doing this, I think it will help all the people switching to
> systemd from OpenRC in Gentoo.
>
> However, I think the zap command is a little misleading, even with the
> note stating that is no "exactly" the same.
Duly noted, I've r
On 03/21/2015 02:46 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> They are; basically everything nowadays is systemd aware. Even OpenRC
> can now use some of its configurations.
>
> Could you run this immediately after booting:
>
> systemd-delta
I've finally gotten around to doing this:
--
On 03/21/2015 02:46 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> Could you run this immediately after booting:
>
> systemd-delta
>
> Just to check that the unit files you are using are not being overridden
> by something.
>
OK, I've confirmed the poweroff target works fine but the reboot and
shutdown ta
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 02:46:39 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:37:06 +0200 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > This really made my day. :-)
> >
> > https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html
>
> The best design ever! So nice and readable font, so yummy
> background,
On 03/31/2015 09:39 PM, Gevisz wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 02:46:39 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:37:06 +0200 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
This really made my day. :-)
https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html
The best design ever! So nice and readable fon
Gevisz wrote:
> It did not load from the first try for me. Than it take some time to
> load from the second attempt. A really awful blue background. The
> quote from the site: “We accept that members in more fortunate
> circumstances may feel that a site with a 16-colour palette and an
> optimal sc
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:46:39 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Yea. We just batting ideas around. For me tho, it just turned into a
> nightmare. If I needed to change something, which file is it in? At
> one time I had a dozen or so files and digging through each one of them
> wastes time. If I have just
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:21:13 + (UTC), James wrote:
> > It's not quite what you are asking for, but packages.g.o lets you
> > filter by arch, and view the contents of ebuilds.
>
> Yea, I have seen that often when I google. Correct but is not
> comprehensive but chronologically organized. I'm
@Holger, that's my symptoms to tee... :-)
Strangely it doesn't effect Arch Linux - running on the same box - with a
newer 3.19.2 kernel. So they must have a patch for the issue (but I can't
figure out what). Perhaps I'll check through the (stock) kernel
configuration as well - to check it matches
Neil,
Simply changing the ebuild version to 3.18.1 doesn't work. The kernel-2
eclass simply won't allow one to build a gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel lower
than / before 3.18.9 now. (Try it if you don't believe me...) That was the
first thing I tried. :-)
On 31 March 2015 at 00:05, Neil Bothwick w
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:47:24 +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
> @Holger, that's my symptoms to tee... :-)
>
> Strangely it doesn't effect Arch Linux - running on the same box - with a
> newer 3.19.2 kernel. So they must have a patch for the issue (but I can't
> figure out what). Perhaps I'll check through t
@Nicolas
This is the first place I went to. But I don't understand what all the
different tar balls of gentoo kernel patch-sets actually mean. It would
nice if the site had a little a bit of Wiki love to make it clearer. For
example I can't figure out what steps are needed to apply the patchsets, t
@Nicolas,
I think I'm getting it now. The patchsets are cumulative and I just need
the base patchset - right? I'm still a little unclear as to what kernel
source I should apply the base patchset to. I want to rebuild the 3.18.8
kernel to double check it's free of the bug...
I can see some nfs sus
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Linux now there's the Magic SysRq Key feature for that. If enabled (I think
> it is by default, may be wrong) you can use ctrl-alt-sysrq plus one these keys
> even if your kernel panics or freezes in most cases (ctrl may only be nee
> > Easy to remember as "Reboot Even If System Utterly Broken"
>
> I remember it as the reverse of "busier".
>
A variant I read somewhere is "Raising (Skinny) Elephants Is So Utterly Boring".
"Skinny" is an extra optional sync, it doesn't hurt and makes the
mnemonic funnier.
On 31/03/2015 02:46, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:42:07 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
I find the separate files much easier to manage as all the settings
for each package are kept separate, and easily removed or changed -
for example when I stop using the pack
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:20:23AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> Given that the emul-linux-x86 package sets are now deprecated and we can now
> with USE="abi_x86_32" emerge our own 32bit libraries where needed, is it now
> easier to move from a no-multilib to a multilib environment, or will it still
> re
On 31/03/2015 12:48, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:20:23AM +0100, Mick wrote:
>> Given that the emul-linux-x86 package sets are now deprecated and we can now
>> with USE="abi_x86_32" emerge our own 32bit libraries where needed, is it now
>> easier to move from a no-multilib to a
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:51:11 +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
lease don't top-post, it is frowned upon on this list, and for good
reason.
> Simply changing the ebuild version to 3.18.1 doesn't work. The kernel-2
> eclass simply won't allow one to build a gentoo-sources 3.18.x kernel
> lower than / before 3.
Neil,
(a) Should I download the vanilla 3.18.1 kernel sources and apply all the
gentoo-sources tar-ball patches in numerical order??
(b) I tried downloading the vanilla 3.18.8 kernel. But of course the
earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.1 - 3.18.6 patches don't apply cleanly... Will
I get to the same pl
On Tuesday 31 March 2015 16:45:08 Bob Wya wrote:
> Neil,
>
> (a) Should I download the vanilla 3.18.1 kernel sources and apply all the
> gentoo-sources tar-ball patches in numerical order??
>
> (b) I tried downloading the vanilla 3.18.8 kernel. But of course the
> earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.1 -
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
>>>
>>> Easy to remember as "Reboot Even If System Utterly Broken"
>>
>> I remember it as the reverse of "busier".
>
> A variant I read somewhere is "Raising (Skinny) Elephants Is So Utterly
> Boring".
> "Skinny" is an extra optional sync,
On 31 March 2015 at 08:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:21:13 + (UTC), James wrote:
>
> > > It's not quite what you are asking for, but packages.g.o lets you
> > > filter by arch, and view the contents of ebuilds.
> >
> > Yea, I have seen that often when I google. Correct but
hello list,
again i have to ask.
Do i need to run mysql_upgrade after upgrading mysql 5.5 > 5.6 ?
I ask because the post install text recommend this after an major
upgrade.
On the Mysql Website is a major upgrade 5.5 > 6.0, not 5.5 > 5.6
So i ask you guys.
Any can help me?
thank you
marko
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:27:38 +0200, Marko Weber | 8000 wrote:
> Do i need to run mysql_upgrade after upgrading mysql 5.5 > 5.6 ?
> I ask because the post install text recommend this after an major
> upgrade.
Do you *need* to? Possibly not. Should you do it? Yes.
If you run it unnecessarily, it
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
>@Nicolas,
>I think I'm getting it now. The patchsets are cumulative and I just
>need the base patchset - right?
base, extras and experimental are all applied.
>I'm still a little unclear as t
This really made my day. :-)
https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html
--
Regards
wabe
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:37:06 +0200 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> This really made my day. :-)
>
> https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html
The best design ever! So nice and readable font, so yummy
background, very fast page load.
Many thanks for Web project team for hard work!
As
Am 01.04.2015 um 01:37 schrieb waben...@gmail.com:
> This really made my day. :-)
>
> https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html
I hope you followed the links there to the new team websites. :-)
Really cool the new website. Finally a modern website that's
technologically up-to-da
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am 01.04.2015 um 01:37 schrieb waben...@gmail.com:
> > This really made my day. :-)
> >
> > https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html
>
> I hope you followed the links there to the new team websites. :-)
Of course I did.
It's a long time ago that I played
Holger Hoffstätte Wrote in message:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:20:23 +0100, Mick wrote:
>
>> Given that the emul-linux-x86 package sets are now deprecated and we can now
>> with USE="abi_x86_32" emerge our own 32bit libraries where needed, is it now
>> easier to move from a no-multilib to a multi
Hello Hydra,
Thank you for your response:
The commands are bellow. Also, the Bios is almost 10 years old on the
machine.
Not sure if that info helps for the ACPI related messages.
USE="app-emulation/xen-tools-4.3.1-r1 api hvm qenu screen -custom-cflags
-debug -doc -flask -xend"
USE="app-emulati
34 matches
Mail list logo
