On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Gevisz wrote
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:59:57 +0100 bitlord wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:09:44 +0200
> > Gevisz wrote:
> >
> > > What is the elegant way to switch off all but one linguas variables
> > > for a given package.
> > >
> > > I have trie
On Thursday 12 February 2015 09:02:33 Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> I think (emphasis on the think) that qtwebkit needs libxml2 with -icu,
> and chromium needs libxml2 with +icu. As far as I can tell from
> reading a couple bug reports, it looks like you can rebuild qtwebkit
> with -gstreamer (since t
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Joseph wrote:
> No, the problem in Fedora was thier "selinux". I suppose to be some extra
> security, but it seems to me it creates only more problems.
A common observation with SELinux. Even so, it definitely DOES
provide additional security. It is a standard
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:02:33AM -0500, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2015 08:15 AM, Gevisz wrote:
> > # emerge --ask chromium
> > ...
> >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
> >> (see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
> >> # required by www-clien
Jeff Smelser gmail.com> writes:
> People do it all the time. You have to set up the amd64's to cross compile.
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc/Cross-Compiling
Here are a few additional links for your perusal:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Distcc
Hello,
So it's been some time for me, but there use to be easy ways
to install .deb or rpm packages on gentoo; maybe in /usr/local/portage. [1]
I only find this guide on wiki.gentoo.org : [2].
So what I really want is a modern (safe) methodical way to quickly install
.deb or rpm packages (ma
Hi, Gentoo.
I'm clearing out dross from my home directory, as me (not as root) and
I've just deleted this file:
-rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 0 Apr 11 2011 grep
, simply by typing $ rm grep. I was prompted with:
rm: remove write-protected regular empty file ■grep■?
, to which
13.02.2015 17:31, Alan Mackenzie пишет:
Hi, Gentoo.
I'm clearing out dross from my home directory, as me (not as root) and
I've just deleted this file:
-rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 0 Apr 11 2011 grep
, simply by typing $ rm grep. I was prompted with:
rm: remove write-prote
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
>
> The owner of a directory is able to delete any files in it. It would really
> be weird otherwise.
>
I think, to be more precise, anybody with write and execute access to
a directory (whether the owner or not) can remove files from a
dir
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:17:42 -0500 "Walter Dnes" wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Gevisz wrote
> > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:59:57 +0100 bitlord wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:09:44 +0200
> > > Gevisz wrote:
> > >
> > > > What is the elegant way to switch off all but o
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:50:35 +0100 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:02:33AM -0500, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> >
> > On 02/12/2015 08:15 AM, Gevisz wrote:
> > > # emerge --ask chromium
> > > ...
> > >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
> > >> (see "pack
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:24:55 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:15:50 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
>
> > And I would not report it if ._cfg0002_package.use would not suggested
> > to insert # required by www-client/chromium-40.0.2214.111
> ># required by chromium (argument)
> >>
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:02:33 -0500 Alec Ten Harmsel
wrote:
> On 02/12/2015 08:15 AM, Gevisz wrote:
> > # emerge --ask chromium
> > ...
> >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
> >> (see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
> >> # required by www-client/chrom
Hi guys,
If you have mesa and eselect-opengl-1.3.X installed, could you please
tell me if the symlink /usr/include/GL/glext.h is broken for you?
Thanks,
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
On 13/02/2015 16:31, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> I'm clearing out dross from my home directory, as me (not as root) and
> I've just deleted this file:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 0 Apr 11 2011 grep
>
> , simply by typing $ rm grep. I was prompted with:
>
> rm:
On 13/02/2015 20:19, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> If you have mesa and eselect-opengl-1.3.X installed, could you please
> tell me if the symlink /usr/include/GL/glext.h is broken for you?
>
> Thanks,
>
All OK here, but it's not a symlink, it's a regular file:
alan@khamul ~ $ l
On 13/02/2015 16:12, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So it's been some time for me, but there use to be easy ways
> to install .deb or rpm packages on gentoo; maybe in /usr/local/portage. [1]
>
> I only find this guide on wiki.gentoo.org : [2].
>
>
> So what I really want is a modern (safe) method
I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system. I now have a
file /etc/portage/repos.conf/local.conf:
[Local]
location = /usr/local/portage
auto-sync = no
And removed the path from make.conf.
However, now layman overlays override my local repo. If I copy an ebuild
to /usr/loc
On 02/13/2015 01:02 PM, Gevisz wrote:
>
> These your suggestions actually forced me to delay the answer, as I needed
> time to check which of my application packages depend on qtwebkit and if
> I really need gstreamer.
My bad. That's why I prefaced my response with "(emphasis on think)" - I
don't
Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes:
> I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system.
"repos.conf system" is very cool; thanks for posting about it;
but it's brand new to me, so I cannot really give you advise. I
did find this, in case you had not seen it yet:
http://wiki.gentoo.or
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:29:07 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system. I now have a
> file /etc/portage/repos.conf/local.conf:
>
>[Local]
>location = /usr/local/portage
>auto-sync = no
> And removed the path from make.conf.
>
> Howe
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> I doubt dpkg and rpm aren't going to be much use to you, unless you
> really want to run two package managers. Besides, both are not
> especially useful with the front ends apt* and yum.
I'd just use those to unpackage and maybe preprocess some of the codes.
Hello, Alan.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:20:13PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 13/02/2015 16:31, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > I'm clearing out dross from my home directory, as me (not as root) and
> > I've just deleted this file:
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 0 Apr
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:08:55 + (UTC), James wrote:
> > I doubt dpkg and rpm aren't going to be much use to you, unless you
> > really want to run two package managers. Besides, both are not
> > especially useful with the front ends apt* and yum.
>
> I'd just use those to unpackage and maybe
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:36:45 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > Has that line actually been inserted into package.use?
> > Portage doesn't add it to the live file, you need to run
> > cfg-update or similar to handle it.
>
> As I have said, it was inserted in the ._cfg0002_package.use file
> as the recomm
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:02:08PM +0200, Gevisz wrote
>
> 2. I am not sure but my guess is that the gstreamer allows me to watch
>the video from youtube (partially), edX, cousera, etc. in a web-browser
>(I mainly use Firefox), as I never install any flash player to avoid
>too many "fl
On 14/02/15 05:08, James wrote:
> Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
>
>
...
>> Any special reason why you don't instead download the sources and build
>> them yourself with PREFIX=/usr/local ?
>
> Lots of errant codes flying everywhere so you have to pull a code audit
> to see what's in the raw
On 02/13/2015 10:19 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> If you have mesa and eselect-opengl-1.3.X installed, could you please
> tell me if the symlink /usr/include/GL/glext.h is broken for you?
Like Alan, I have a regular file and not a symlink. The file was installed
by mesa-10.4.4
On 02/13/15 16:19, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
Hi guys,
If you have mesa and eselect-opengl-1.3.X installed, could you please
tell me if the symlink /usr/include/GL/glext.h is broken for you?
Thanks,
Valid symlink here:
$ ls -la /usr/include/GL/glext.h
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 Feb 4 15:52
I have a hard time finding any documentation on how to print over VPN.
I have a network printer and I would like to setup my laptop to print to it
over VPN.
The remote VPN IP address is: 192.168.151.1
The printer IP is: socket://10.0.0.105
and lpd://10.0.0.106/BINARY_P1
I think I need some entr
On 02/13/2015 09:50 PM, Joseph wrote:
> I have a hard time finding any documentation on how to print over VPN.
>
> I have a network printer and I would like to setup my laptop to print to it
> over VPN.
> The remote VPN IP address is: 192.168.151.1
> The printer IP is: socket://10.0.0.105
> and l
On 02/13/15 22:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 02/13/2015 09:50 PM, Joseph wrote:
I have a hard time finding any documentation on how to print over VPN.
I have a network printer and I would like to setup my laptop to print to it
over VPN.
The remote VPN IP address is: 192.168.151.1
The printer
On 02/13/15 20:44, Joseph wrote:
On 02/13/15 22:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 02/13/2015 09:50 PM, Joseph wrote:
I have a hard time finding any documentation on how to print over VPN.
I have a network printer and I would like to setup my laptop to print to it
over VPN.
The remote VPN IP addr
It looks like /etc/systemd/system/network@.service requires a gateway=
line, however, for a second interface I wont set another default. Is there
a standard way to so this, or do i have to copy network@.service to a new
name and remove the 'ip route add' line?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
>
> It looks like /etc/systemd/system/network@.service requires a gateway=
line, however, for a second interface I wont set another default. Is there
a standard way to so this, or do i have to copy network@.service to a new
name and remove the '
On 13/02/2015 23:08, James wrote:
> Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> I doubt dpkg and rpm aren't going to be much use to you, unless you
>> really want to run two package managers. Besides, both are not
>> especially useful with the front ends apt* and yum.
>
> I'd just use those to unpa
On 14/02/2015 00:05, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> Trust me, there is no arguing with this - Unix has always worked this
>> > way and likely always will.
> :-) I ask myself, how come I've got this far without learning this
> pretty basic fact?
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
:-)
Don't feel too ba
On 02/13/15 22:39, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Adam Carter
<[1]adamcart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like /etc/systemd/system/network@.service requires a
gateway= line, however, for a second interface I wont set another
default. Is there a standar
38 matches
Mail list logo
