Hi everybody,
I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd boot
message as :
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such
file or directory
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules': No such
file or directory
..
On 21/05/2012 2:48 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 20/05/12 12:41, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
Just for sake of correctness, what the op wants is called normalization,
in the world of sound edition.
Actually, no. That's not what he wants. Normalization simply adjusts to
0db. How loud some
> I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd boot
> message as :
> udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such
> file or directory
> udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules': No such
> file or directory
> ..
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 21/05/2012 2:48 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>
>> On 20/05/12 12:41, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
>>>
>>> Just for sake of correctness, what the op wants is called normalization,
>>> in the world of sound edition.
>>
>>
>> Actually, no
I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working
fine. Today 2.2.0.35-r99 is ~amd64, which is perfectly fine, but
they've completely removed -r1 and now I'm required to unmask
emulation packages that only came out today
On May 21, 2012 9:18 PM, "Andrew Lowe" wrote:
>
[ze schnipp]
>Aarrrggghhh, I'm getting confused. More background on my original
question. I work in a liquor store and the manager insists on playing the
usual crappy FM radio station, "MORE HITS WHEN YOU WANT THEM AND WE HAVE
THE BEST VARI
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
> skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working
> fine. Today 2.2.0.35-r99 is ~amd64, which is perfectly fine, but
> they've completely removed -r1 and now I'm r
On 21/05/2012 10:51 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On May 21, 2012 9:18 PM, "Andrew Lowe" mailto:a...@wht.com.au>> wrote:
>
[ze schnipp]
>Aarrrggghhh, I'm getting confused. More background on my
original question. I work in a liquor store and the manager insists on
playing the usual crappy
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> Dipping only slightly further offtopic, are they still pressing vinyl?
Sales of vinyl LPs have actually gone up for the past 6 years, selling
3.5 million new LPs last year, according to Nielsen SoundScan which is
the organization that tracks m
Le 21/05/2012 16:27, Michael Hampicke a écrit :
>> I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd boot
>> message as :
>> udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such
>> file or directory
>> udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules':
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> Dipping only slightly further offtopic, are they still pressing vinyl?
>
> Sales of vinyl LPs have actually gone up for the past 6 years, selling
> 3.5 million new LPs last year, accordi
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
>> skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working
>> fine. Today 2.2.0.35-r99 is ~amd64, which is perf
On 21 May 2012, at 02:06, Michael Mol wrote:
> ...
>>
>>> And the final stitch is here:
>>> http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2030/brum3068brum30702.jpg
>>
>> All Firefox gives me is a black window : can you check ?
>
> Works on my system. It comes up all-black in geeqie, though; I had to
> lo
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
>>> skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and wo
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 08:55:25 schrieb Mark Knecht:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras
wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
> >> skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed
on 2012-05-21 at 22:14 Andrew Lowe wrote:
> I have no intention of applying whatever process to the media machine,
> the tracks on that remain as ripped. I only want to "fiddle" the tracks
> on the memory stick.
your files are mp3, right? what you want to do is fairly simple, just use
media-soun
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Stroller
wrote:
>
> On 21 May 2012, at 02:06, Michael Mol wrote:
>> ...
>>>
And the final stitch is here:
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2030/brum3068brum30702.jpg
>>>
>>> All Firefox gives me is a black window : can you check ?
>>
>> Works on my sys
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> Dipping only slightly further offtopic, are they still pressing vinyl?
>>
>> Sales of vinyl LPs have actually gone up for the
On 2012-05-19 8:09 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
But stay away from OpenDNS like the plague. They are known to perform
false resolve, especially if the domain being resolved does not exist.
Simple to disable, been using OpenDNS for many years, no problems
whatsoever...
On 21 May 2012, at 02:07, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> ...
>>> All digital Led Zep releases (i.e. including all CDs) are notoriously
>>> poorly remastered, with excessive gain applied.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war
>>>
>>> So far they have deteriorated with each remastering / re-r
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
> I'm seriously wondering if there might not be something broken with
> the .jpeg files I'm spitting out. That laptop (saffron) is in the
> middle of an overdue emerge --update --deep --newuse @world, though.
> (And I saw it was complai
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> I'm seriously wondering if there might not be something broken with
> the .jpeg files I'm spitting out. That laptop (saffron) is in the
> middle of an overdue emerge --update --deep --newuse @world, though.
> (And I saw it was complaining ab
el 2012-05-20 a las 21:48 Nikos Chantziaras escribió:
> On 20/05/12 12:41, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
> > Just for sake of correctness, what the op wants is called
> > normalization, in the world of sound edition.
>
> Actually, no. That's not what he wants. Normalization simply adjusts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/21/2012 05:10 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 08:55:25 schrieb Mark Knecht:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras
>>
> wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht
>>> wrote:
I love my
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>> I'm seriously wondering if there might not be something broken with
>> the .jpeg files I'm spitting out. That laptop (saffron) is in the
>> middle of an overdue emerge --update --dee
After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
the ebuild log suggests to run:
# revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5'
and once finished running revdep-rebuild, it should be safe to
delete the old libraries, like so:
# rm '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5'
However
On May 21, 2012 11:22 PM, "luis jure" wrote:
>
> on 2012-05-21 at 22:14 Andrew Lowe wrote:
>
> > I have no intention of applying whatever process to the media machine,
> > the tracks on that remain as ripped. I only want to "fiddle" the tracks
> > on the memory stick.
>
> your files are mp3, right
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thanasis wrote:
> After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
> the ebuild log suggests to run:
>
> # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5'
>
> and once finished running revdep-rebuild, it should be safe to
> delete the old l
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> if you use testing, you have to deal with such kind of situations.
>> Using a known broken version is just stupid. There isn't a choice
>> between those two. There is only a choice between: use unstable or
>> stable. And if you use unsta
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 10:54:08 schrieb Mark Knecht:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>
> >> if you use testing, you have to deal with such kind of situations.
> >> Using a known broken version is just stupid. There isn't a choice
> >> between those two. There is on
on 05/21/2012 08:49 PM Michael Mol wrote the following:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thanasis wrote:
>> After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
>> the ebuild log suggests to run:
>>
>> # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5'
>>
>> and once finished
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Thanasis wrote:
> on 05/21/2012 08:49 PM Michael Mol wrote the following:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thanasis wrote:
>>> After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
>>> the ebuild log suggests to run:
>>>
>>> # revdep-rebuild -
It looks like the @INC list (the directory list perl uses for finding
its modules) is not right or is not processed right. Only one
directory is looked into? (You can see @INC with "perl -V", it should
be up to about ten directories on a Gentoo install.)
Unless you really, really want to know exac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/21/2012 07:16 PM, Thanasis wrote:
> on 05/21/2012 08:49 PM Michael Mol wrote the following:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thanasis
>> wrote:
>>> After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to
>>> 3.0.11 the ebuild log su
Hi,
since some update (which I was not able to trace back
but I think it was either baselayout or udev) I see
this message whenever I start any of my vserver
gentoo-guests:
OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
* /proc is already mounted, skipping
* Mounting /run ...
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since some update (which I was not able to trace back
> but I think it was either baselayout or udev) I see
> this message whenever I start any of my vserver
> gentoo-guests:
>
> OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
On 21-May-12 21:43, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
* /proc is already mounted, skipping
* Mounting /run ... mount: permission denied [ !! ]
...
What does it mean and how can I fix it?
Does the directory /run exists?
Yes,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Jarry wrote:
> On 21-May-12 21:43, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>>> OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
>>> * /proc is already mounted, skipping
>>> * Mounting /run ... mount: permission denied [ !! ]
>>> ...
>>> What does it me
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Jarry wrote:
>> On 21-May-12 21:43, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
* /proc is already mounted, skipping
* Mounting /run ... mount: permission denied
on 05/21/2012 09:52 PM Markos Chandras wrote the following:
>
> I believe the old library appears to be owned by the new version
> because it is "preserved". Once you run the revdep-rebuild command,
> everything should link to the new linker name and you should be safe
> to remove the old library
On 05/21/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>> I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd
>> boot message as : udevd[1389]: can not find
>> '/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such file or directory
>> udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules':
On 05/21/2012 09:50 PM, Thanasis wrote:
> on 05/21/2012 09:52 PM Markos Chandras wrote the following:
>
>>
>> I believe the old library appears to be owned by the new version
>> because it is "preserved". Once you run the revdep-rebuild
>> command, everything should link to the new linker name a
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, David Haller wrote:
> >I bought my current internal laptop disk for Christmas 2008. It's a Samsung
> >HM500JI (with 500 GB). Early on I noticed that, according to smartctl, its
> >Load_Cycle_Count is increasing every 2 or 3 seconds. I even asked Samsung
Hello,
have someone installed XFCE in Version 4.10 and can me tell, has same
with the windows which are now in the back of the menupanel?
Screenshot:
Old: http://silviosiefke.de/img/ext/old.png
New: http://silviosiefke.de/img/ext/new.png
They are others Relation in Screenshots, one is my Netboo
You guys might find this study from google interesting:
http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/research.google.com/en/us/archive/disk_failures.pdf
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, David Haller wro
well, because that expanding option for "window buttons" is
disappeared in this (4.10) version.
so You'd better to check below link and find "Window Buttons" section.
http://www.xfce.org/about/tour?lang=en
It will helps you. cheers :D
Seong-ho, Cho.
2012/5/22 Silvio Siefke :
> Hello,
>
> have s
You need to add a spacer to your panel.
Right click on the panel.
Select the panel pop out menu.
Select "Add New Items...".
Select "Separator".
It will add it to the panel at the end, from what is see you might want
it to the right of your Windows List. When you do get it to where you
want it jus
Hello,
Today during an emerge -Dauvt world, portage asked me to update a
bunch of Ruby USE flags and install a bunch of new RUBY projects.
Here is a snippet:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=PK8ubZeB
Normally I just give portage the green light to install whatever it
wants, but the USE change reque
Lately, I've been having some issues with segfaults when running
startx and it's been pretty persistent.
Xorg.0.log and emerge --info are available at https://gist.github.com/2766926 .
Kernel config is available at https://gist.github.com/276943 .
I've tried downgrading, but <=x11-drivers/xf86-vi
49 matches
Mail list logo
