On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:49:21 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
> When booting the kernel successfully mounts /dev/sdb3 as root fs
> Then the system halts at one of the freeing memory messages, but I
> assume the problem is that init isn't executed from /dev/sdb3
Doesn't the kernel say something along the
After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the usual
office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't enough space in /var
(I have 5.8G and it was asking for more than 7G+).
Half way through the emerge I noticed that I have only 74M left and is going
down fast!
On Sunday, July 24 at 09:49 (+1000), Adam Carter said:
> Summary;
> Copied / from sda3 to sdb3
> Updated the fstab in the new disk (/dev/sdb3 /
> btrfs noatime,compress=lzo0 0)
> Updated the kernel line's root=/dev/sda3 to /dev/sdb3 in grub.conf,
> but left the root (hd0,0) a
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:49:21 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
>
>> When booting the kernel successfully mounts /dev/sdb3 as root fs
>> Then the system halts at one of the freeing memory messages, but I
>> assume the problem is that init isn't execut
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:02:34AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the usual
> office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't enough space in /var
> (I have 5.8G and it was asking for more than 7G+).
>
> Half way through the emerg
On Monday 25 Jul 2011 11:24:33 YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:02:34AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the
> > usual office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't enough
> > space in /var (I have 5.8G and it was ask
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Mick wrote:
> After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the
> usual
> office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't enough space in
> /var
> (I have 5.8G and it was asking for more than 7G+).
>
> Half way through the emerge I no
> No message about init, just no more console messages. I'll try the
> kernel line. Thanks.
Ok. i ran init from the shell, and it reported /dev/initctl no such
device or directory.
I hadnt copied the contents of /dev across - i thought it was created
automagically?
Anyway, its copied now and I h
On Thursday 21 July 2011 10:53:25 Dale wrote:
> Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 July 2011 05:54:32 Dale wrote:
> >> I been working on gathering information for this for a while. I just
> >> tried something else. I use the download helper plugin in Firefox to
> >> download videos. Also,
Hi,
emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
shows that the USE flag -java is in effect.
How to find out where this comes from?
I've checked /etc/portage/package.use /usr/portage/profiles and /
etc/make.conf
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
On Monday, July 25 at 21:04 (+1000), Adam Carter said:
> > No message about init, just no more console messages. I'll try the
> > kernel line. Thanks.
>
> Ok. i ran init from the shell, and it reported /dev/initctl no such
> device or directory.
>
> I hadnt copied the contents of /dev across -
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:40:55AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 25 Jul 2011 11:24:33 YoYo Siska wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:02:34AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the
> > > usual office suite warnings at the beginning that th
euse -a
part of gentoolkit, I believe.
Ref: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Gentoolkit
Rgds,
On 2011-07-25, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
>
> shows that the USE flag -java is in effect.
>
> How to find out where this comes from?
>
> I've checked /etc/por
On Monday 25 Jul 2011 12:18:34 YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:40:55AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > I never understood properly how the mount --bind/rbind works. I
> > understand that the original partition content becomes visible on a
> > second partition, but I'm not at all sure what h
On Monday 25 Jul 2011 12:13:49 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
>
> shows that the USE flag -java is in effect.
>
> How to find out where this comes from?
>
> I've checked /etc/portage/package.use /usr/portage/profiles and /
> etc/make.conf
euse -i java
On 07/25/2011 01:34:39 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> euse -a
>
> part of gentoolkit, I believe.
>
> Ref: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Gentoolkit
>
> Rgds,
>
>
> On 2011-07-25, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
> >
> > shows that the USE flag -java is in
On Monday 25 July 2011 13:50:47 Helmut Jarausch did opine thusly:
> On 07/25/2011 01:34:39 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > euse -a
> >
> > part of gentoolkit, I believe.
> >
> > Ref: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Gentoolkit
> >
> > Rgds,
> >
> > On 2011-07-25, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
On Monday 25 July 2011 11:02:34 Mick did opine thusly:
> After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave
> the usual office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't
> enough space in /var (I have 5.8G and it was asking for more than
> 7G+).
>
> Half way through the emer
On 07/25/2011 03:44 AM, pk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just put together a new computer composed of an Asus motherboard (AMD
> 990FX chipset, "Sabertooth" model, i.e. this one:
> http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_AM3Plus/SABERTOOTH_990FX/).
> Initially, the onboard usb devices worked fine in AMD64 Gent
On 07/25/11 14:24, walt wrote:
> So, you're saying that usb stick has actually changed in some way after
> the install? That's certainly possible. Have you tried making a new
> one from the live cd?
No, I'm saying that the usb ports on the motherboard seems dead in my
now brand new Gentoo insta
On 07/22/11 21:56, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> Is there anyone who can help me recover my raid array?
>
>>
>> Next, I tried commenting out the previously added DEVICE line, and
>> adding
>> ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sda,/dev/sdb,/dev/sdc
>>
>> mdadm --assemble --scan returns something different
>> mda
Helmut Jarausch igpm.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
> emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
> shows that the USE flag -java is in effect.
> How to find out where this comes from?
equery hasuse java
hth,
James
Hello list,
Just a note to anyone who hasn't already found out the hard way:
After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common wouldn't
compile because it couldn't find the right icu library.
Revdep-rebuild was required to fix this - so it does still have a use, after
all.
-
On 2011-07-25, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Just a note to anyone who hasn't already found out the hard way:
>
> After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common
> wouldn't compile because it couldn't find the right icu library.
>
> Revdep-rebuild was required to fix this - so it do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
"[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
>After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common
>wouldn't compile because it couldn't find the right icu library.
>
>Revdep-re
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
David W Noon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
"[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common
wouldn't compile because it couldn't find the right
Am 25.07.2011 20:56, schrieb Dale:
> David W Noon wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
> "[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
>
>
After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common
wouldn't compile because it couldn't find the ri
Todd Goodman wrote:
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
That does look interesting. I had a few times where mine would just
hang
* Dale [110725 14:43]:
> Todd Goodman wrote:
> > Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
> >
> > I don't know if you've seen it but:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
> >
> > looks like a thread that might be applicable?
> >
> > Todd
> >
> >
> >
>
> That
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dale [110725 14:43]:
Todd Goodman wrote:
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
That does look
Hello list,
I want to clean out some dross before my routine backup, but eclean falls
over with this error:
# eclean-pkg
* Building file list for packages cleaning...
* Cleaning binary packages...
!!! Could not get stat info for:/usr/portage/packages/dev-lang/python-3.1.2-
r4.tbz2
!!! Error:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>
> !!! Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/portage/packages/dev-
> lang/python-3.1.2-r4.tbz2'
>
>
> eix doesn't show such a version of python, so where is it coming from?
Cruft left over somewhere? Possibly try:
locate python
Greetings,
after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
execute revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*'. Doing this two packages
were found and emerged.
Now, shouldn't these have been found already by
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
> which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
> execute revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*'. Doing this two packages
> were fo
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
>> which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
>> execute revdep-rebui
Hartmut Figge:
> Now, shouldn't these have been found already by the previous revdep-rebuild?
And after the next revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*' the same two
packages are found and rebuild. And so on.
i5 hafi # revdep-rebuild -p --library='libosp.so.*'
[...]
* Checking dynamic linking
[
Paul Hartman:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman
>> I believe --library rebuilds everything that uses that library, not
>> broken packages.
>
> To test my theory you can run the command again and see if it finds
> the same 2 packages again. :)
You are right and to quick to to hold b
Hartmut Figge:
> You are right and to quick to to hold back my own previous reply. ;)
Hard to understand a sentence with such many errors. A challenge. :)
Hartmut
--
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User :-)
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Hartmut Figge:
>
>> You are right and to quick to to hold back my own previous reply. ;)
>
> Hard to understand a sentence with such many errors. A challenge. :)
I like puzzles but I understood perfectly what you said. :)
On 07/25/2011 06:44 AM, pk wrote:
> On 07/25/11 14:24, walt wrote:
>
>> So, you're saying that usb stick has actually changed in some way after
>> the install? That's certainly possible. Have you tried making a new
>> one from the live cd?
>
> ...I did redo the usb stick but it refuses to boot
On 07/25/2011 10:27 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Just a note to anyone who hasn't already found out the hard way:
>
> After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common wouldn't
> compile because it couldn't find the right icu library.
Just one package? You got
On 07/25/2011 01:00 PM, Dale wrote:
> I'm not subscribed and [lkml] is a very high traffic list.
Only a masochist or a kernel dev would subscribe to that list.
A far better way is to track the family of kernel-related lists
on gmane.org, e.g. the gmane.linux.kernel newsgroup.
You can even post
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:45 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/22/11 21:56, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> > Is there anyone who can help me recover my raid array?
> >
> >>
> >> Next, I tried commenting out the previously added DEVICE line, and
> >> adding
> >> ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sda,/dev/sdb,
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:45 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/22/11 21:56, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> > Is there anyone who can help me recover my raid array?
> >
> >>
> >> Next, I tried commenting out the previously added DEVICE line, and
> >> adding
> >> ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sda,/dev/sdb,
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:30 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
> >> which found nothing to to.
On 07/25/2011 08:00 PM, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:45 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 07/22/11 21:56, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
>>> Is there anyone who can help me recover my raid array?
>>>
Next, I tried commenting out the previously added DEVICE line, and
adding
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:06, Florian Philipp wrote:
>
> Am 25.07.2011 20:56, schrieb Dale:
> > David W Noon wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
> > "[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
> >
> >
> After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-p
>> Sounds like a case for a swap partition that can be activated when you
>> need it for big emerges. I hit the same thing with firefox-5 oddly
>> enough.
>
> I have one smallish swap partition at PRI=10 and a bigger one at PRI=1.
>
>> As for OOo, long ago I figured the pain wasn't worth the gain s
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:06, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 20:56, schrieb Dale:
David W Noon wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
"[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
After upgrading icu today I found that s
50 matches
Mail list logo
