Le 10/05/2011 23:55, Dale a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that
> have done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there
> issues? I'm mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I
> have. Just a simple works here
110511 Dale wrote:
> Do you, or anyone else, have the parallel startup enabled?
> I started to but noticed the warning in the config file.
No & for the same reason as yourself.
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb
E
On Wed, 11 May 2011 01:55:05 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Do you, or anyone else, have the parallel startup enabled? I
> started to but noticed the warning in the config file.
I've tried it in the past. I didn't notice any massive speedup, but no
problems either, except that that the init messages are
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 01:55:05 -0500, Dale wrote:
Do you, or anyone else, have the parallel startup enabled? I
started to but noticed the warning in the config file.
I've tried it in the past. I didn't notice any massive speedup, but no
problems either, except t
On Wed, 11 May 2011 04:55:46 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I'll leave it like it is I guess. I like all the little green OK's
> that scroll up anyway.
Reassuring, aren't they?
--
Neil Bothwick
"Meow" "Woof" Jeez, it's really raining today.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 04:55:46 -0500, Dale wrote:
I'll leave it like it is I guess. I like all the little green OK's
that scroll up anyway.
Reassuring, aren't they?
What's bad is when something doesn't start for some reason and you don't
know it didn't st
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Dale wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that have
> done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there issues? I'm
> mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I have. Just a simple
>
Hi, Dale.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:55:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that
> have done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there
> issues? I'm mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I
> have
No issues, followed the guide, everything working.
Felix Leif
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 16:55:01 Dale wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that
> have done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there
> issues? I'm mostly intereste
On 05/11/2011 02:50 AM, Dale wrote:
[...]
What do you know, I upgraded and it worked. Now if I can just get rid of
this Nepomuk thingy that pops up a bit after I login to KDE.
You disable that in System Settings. There's an icon for it there. Or,
you build KDE with "-semantic-desktop" in you
Hi,
Maybe, a little OT.
Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be
completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify?
Thank You!
--
mv
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Dale.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:55:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that
have done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there
issues? I'm mostly interested in x86 and am
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Dale wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that have
> done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there issues? I'm
> mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I have. Just a simple
>
Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
Hi,
Maybe, a little OT.
Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be
completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify?
Thank You!
This is how I did mine.
root@fireball / # cat /etc/make.conf | grep utf
LC_ALL="en_US.utf8"
root@
On 05/11/2011 03:16 PM, Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
Hi,
Maybe, a little OT.
Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be
completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify?
Thank You!
/etc/env.d/02locale. Here, it looks like this:
LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8"
LANG=
Hi,
after I went to openrc all works fine just one thing disturbing now:
If I create a xen-guest with xm create guest -c or change to the console
when the system boots, some of the characters particularly [] are garbled.
Is there a way to fix this?
Regards,
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Ag
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Dale wrote:
> Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Maybe, a little OT.
>> Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be
>> completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify?
>> Thank You!
>>
>>
>
> This is how I did mine.
>
> r
110511 Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
> Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system
> to be completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify?
In ~/.bashrc & /root/.bashrc I have
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
Amend for your local language, if you wish.
--
=
On 05/11/2011 03:33 PM, Dale wrote:
Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
Hi,
Maybe, a little OT.
Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be
completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify?
Thank You!
This is how I did mine.
root@fireball / # cat /etc/make.conf | g
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 03:33 PM, Dale wrote:
Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
Hi,
Maybe, a little OT.
Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be
completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify?
Thank You!
This is how I did mine.
root@fireball
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 02:50 AM, Dale wrote:
[...]
What do you know, I upgraded and it worked. Now if I can just get rid of
this Nepomuk thingy that pops up a bit after I login to KDE.
You disable that in System Settings. There's an icon for it there.
Or, you build KDE with
On Wed, 11 May 2011 15:33:02 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> The second file is /etc/locale.gen. On my system:
>
>en_US ISO-8859-1
>en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8
>
> I don't know why I have the first line there. I guess it's a fallback.
> The second line must be the same as what you used in e
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:27 +, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after I went to openrc all works fine just one thing disturbing now:
> If I create a xen-guest with xm create guest -c or change to the console
> when the system boots, some of the characters particularly [] are garbled.
I h
On 2011-05-11, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-05-10, Mick wrote:
>
>>> Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
>>> If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7,
>>> removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing...
>>
>> I am not sure I understand:
>>
Hi,
I'm building a catalyst target for installing with ROOT=/tmp/rootfs
Looking on the genkernel man page and I can't find a way to install the
kernel
to ROOT.
Is there a way to do that?
Thanks,
Kfir
Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 May 2011 04:55:46 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'll leave it like it is I guess. I like all the little green OK's
>>> that scroll up anyway.
>>>
>> Reassuring, aren't they?
>>
>>
>>
>
> What's bad is when something doesn't start for s
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:45 on Wednesday 11 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 05/11/2011 02:50 AM, Dale wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> What do you know, I upgraded and it worked. Now if I can just get rid of
> >> this Nepomuk thingy that pops up a bit after I lo
On 05/11/2011 04:40 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 03:33 PM, Dale wrote:
Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be
completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify?
Thank You!
This is how I did mine.
roo
On 5/11/2011 9:40 AM, Dale wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 03:33 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> root@fireball / # cat /etc/make.conf | grep utf
>>> LC_ALL="en_US.utf8"
>>> root@fireball / #
Putting your LC_* values in make.conf means they're only going to apply
when you are building thing
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dale wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that have
> done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there issues? I'm
> mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I have. Just a simple
> w
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> It uses hardly any cpu at all, regardless of what the naysayers say.
>
Well, add me to the "naysayers" list then, because my experience directly
contradicts that statement. Much happier with fluxbox, completely finished
fooling
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 04:40 PM, Dale wrote:
Funny that it seems to work. I don't have that file:
root@fireball / # cat /etc/env.d/02locale
cat: /etc/env.d/02locale: No such file or directory
root@fireball / #
Maybe the "02" prefix is random. Try:
grep LC_ALL /etc/env.d/*
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:06 on Wednesday 11 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > It uses hardly any cpu at all, regardless of what the naysayers say.
>
> Well, add me to the "naysayers" list then, because my experience di
On 05/11/2011 06:42 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 04:40 PM, Dale wrote:
Funny that it seems to work. I don't have that file:
root@fireball / # cat /etc/env.d/02locale
cat: /etc/env.d/02locale: No such file or directory
root@fireball / #
Maybe the "02" prefix is rand
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that have
done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there issues? I'm
mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I have.
On 05/11/2011 06:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 06:42 PM, Dale wrote:
That was quick:
root@fireball / # grep LC_ALL /etc/env.d/*
root@fireball / #
Guess that is not in env.d anywhere. :/
Then I guess you can create it on your own. See:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/guide-local
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that
>>> have
>>> done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there is
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 17:06 on Wednesday 11 May 2011, Indi did
> opine
> thusly:
>
> > I still don't understand why the kde folks went from something that
> > worked extremely well to their current state. Baffling.
>
> W
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:33:02PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 03:16 PM, Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
> /etc/env.d/02locale. Here, it looks like this:
>
>LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8"
>LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
It is not recommended that you set LC_ALL in startup files at all, just
lang
- Original Message
> From: Alan McKinnon
> > I still don't understand why the kde folks went from something that
> > worked extremely well to their current state. Baffling.
>
> KDE3 and KDE4 are not the same thing.
> KDE4 is not the next version of KDE3.
>
> You must consider KDE4
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 06:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 06:42 PM, Dale wrote:
That was quick:
root@fireball / # grep LC_ALL /etc/env.d/*
root@fireball / #
Guess that is not in env.d anywhere. :/
Then I guess you can create it on your own. See:
http://www.gen
James Wall wrote:
I remember expat and e2fsprogs breaking spectacularly with no warning
whatsoever back when
That was fun. This update is a complete opposite from those nightmares.
James Wall
That was one of the ones I was thinking about. I have to say, things in
the dev world hav
On 5/11/2011 12:54 PM, Dale wrote:
> root@fireball / # locale -a
> C
> POSIX
> en_US
> en_US.iso88591
> en_US.utf8
So you have three locales installed (C and POSIX are internal and always
present) that are the same language and region with different character
sets. You probably don't need to do t
On 5/11/2011 12:02 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 06:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 06:42 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> That was quick:
>>>
>>> root@fireball / # grep LC_ALL /etc/env.d/*
>>> root@fireball / #
>>>
>>> Guess that is not in env.d anywhere. :/
>>
>> Then I guess y
Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called up
for removal:
sys-apps/dmidecode
selected: 2.10
protected: none
omitted: none
I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forgot about it?
Anyway, this confused me more:
kde-base/ok
Have noticed that some packages require virtual packages to installed
as well. For example when installing dev-db/mysql, virtual/mysql is
installed as well.
What are the purposes of these "virtual" packages??
Thanks
--
John D Maunder
j...@articwolf.myzen.co.uk
On 05/11/2011 03:10 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011 04:55:46 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> I'll leave it like it is I guess. I like all the little green OK's
>> that scroll up anyway.
>
> Reassuring, aren't they?
I'd like a similar system for checking my marriage.
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 03:53:06 Walter Dnes wrote:
> Like the subject says, rdate has stopped working for me. I tried
> different timeservers, with and without iptables firewall, and it always
> times out. /var/log/portage shows that I emerged the current version of
> rdate back in early Augu
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 22:28:22 you wrote:
> Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called
> up for removal:
>
> sys-apps/dmidecode
> selected: 2.10
>protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forg
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:43 PM, John wrote:
>
> Have noticed that some packages require virtual packages to installed
> as well. For example when installing dev-db/mysql, virtual/mysql is
> installed as well.
>
> What are the purposes of these "virtual" packages??
I think it is usually when ther
On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote:
Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called up
for removal:
sys-apps/dmidecode
selected: 2.10
protected: none
omitted: none
I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forgot about it?
Do you
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mick wrote:
> kde-base/knetworkconf
> selected: 4.4.5
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> Is asking to be removed, but there isn't a 4.6 version. Has it been replaced
> by something else?
It was replaced by knetworkmanager
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Mick wrote:
> Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called up
> for removal:
>
> okteta is not my world file. So something brought it in. It was not updated
> to v6, instead when I try to update it manually is asking for a second sl
Mike Edenfield wrote:
This means that your UTF-8 setup is clearly *not* working :) Your locale
is not being set anywhere, it's using the glibc default of POSIX. POSIX
is approximately equal to en_US as far as date/time, sorting, etc. but
lacks most of the numeric formatting (no currency symbol,
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 22:14:55 Mike Edenfield wrote:
> The only problem with LC_ALL is that it overrides all of the other LC_*
> variables.
- which is precisely what most ordinary desktop users want. In such a case it's
a useful shorthand. Personally, I have no intention of ever allowing US
>
> >>> Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
> >>> If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7,
> >>> removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing...
>
Sounds to me like that should be made into a feature request. What does the
list think? If the
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Mick wrote
> I recall that not all ntp servers respond to rdate - perhaps the
> server(s) you tried have changed their configuration?
Finally found one... nist1-ny.ustiming.org
I'm in Toronto Canada, and New York City is about as close as it gets
to
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:45:07PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> KDE devs decided to take the risk and make the jump ahead of the curve.
Coca Cola went from Coke Classic to New Coke; at least they had the
guts to admit that it was a bad idea, and reverse it.
IBM walked away from their market
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:56:05PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> Possibly one more problem, rdate seems to have stopped working for me.
> I've opened a separate thread on that.
Not really. It seems that rdate is being dprecated in favour of NTP.
I found an rdate server, but will eventually switch
On 05/11/2011 08:09 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Mick wrote
>
>> I recall that not all ntp servers respond to rdate - perhaps the
>> server(s) you tried have changed their configuration?
>
> Finally found one... nist1-ny.ustiming.org
>
> I'm in Toronto C
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
> >>> Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
>> >>> If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7,
>> >>> removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing...
>>
>
> Sounds to me like that should be mad
On 5/11/2011 6:51 PM, Dale wrote:
Does this look more better?
root@fireball / # locale
LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF8"
LC_NAME="en_US.UTF8"
LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF8"
LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF8"
LC_PAPER, is that like paper in my printer? What the
On 5/11/2011 7:31 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 22:14:55 Mike Edenfield wrote:
The only problem with LC_ALL is that it overrides all of the other LC_*
variables.
- which is precisely what most ordinary desktop users want. In such a case it's
a useful shorthand. Personally
Hi,
after upgradeing to openrc there still some issues...
1) After reboot eth1 (there was/is no eth0!) is up and
running (according to ifconfig) but
ping
returns "unknown host". After calling /etc/init.d/net.eth1
(which is a symlink to /etc/net.lo) as root by hand aga
Hi,
this morning there was an update to nvidia-drivers-270.41.06.
After running dmesg I found this:
ioremap error for 0x9a000-0x9b000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
ioremap error for 0xcfe9-0xcfe91000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
I dont know, whether this is related to that update...
In the
On 5/11/2011 5:43 PM, John wrote:
Have noticed that some packages require virtual packages to installed
as well. For example when installing dev-db/mysql, virtual/mysql is
installed as well.
What are the purposes of these "virtual" packages??
They allow other packages to depend on the presenc
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after upgradeing to openrc there still some issues...
>
> 1) After reboot eth1 (there was/is no eth0!) is up and
>running (according to ifconfig) but
>
> ping
>
>returns "unknown host". After calling /etc/init.d/net.eth1
>(whic
Hello everyone. I am going to build a new gentoo box. Will the next
auto-build stage tar ball (2011-5-12) for amd64 include the OpenRC update?
If so I will not suffer the baselayout updating.
On May 11, 2011 4:38 PM, "walt" wrote:
>
> On 05/11/2011 03:10 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 May 2011 04:55:46 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >
> >> I'll leave it like it is I guess. I like all the little green OK's
> >> that scroll up anyway.
> >
> > Reassuring, aren't they?
>
> I'd like a simil
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being
> > called up
> >
> > for removal:
> > sys-apps/dmidecode
> >
> > selected: 2.10
> >
> > protected: none
> >
on 05/12/2011 06:13 AM meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote the following:
> Hi,
>
> after upgradeing to openrc there still some issues...
>
> 1) After reboot eth1 (there was/is no eth0!) is up and
>running (according to ifconfig) but
>
> ping
>
>returns "unknown host". After cal
meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> this morning there was an update to nvidia-drivers-270.41.06.
I am back to 270.41.03 because dosemu caused a high load and games with
it acted poorly. Haven't investigated further.
Hartmut
--
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User :-)
72 matches
Mail list logo
