On Thu, March 24, 2011 7:37 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 00:03, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> More update on my odyssey.
>
> I went back to HVM and reboot using the Install CD. I did a 'chroot'
> followed by 'rc-update add ss
On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 14:04:23 Mr. Jarry wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>>
>> wrote:
>> > And if you don't care about barriers, jfs might be a good choice.
>>
>> Knowing nothing about "barriers" I
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:47, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 7:37 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 00:03, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> More update on my odyssey.
>>
>> I went back to HVM and reboot using
On Thu, March 24, 2011 9:20 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:47, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 7:37 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 00:03, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> More up
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 9:20 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:47, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 7:37 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 201
Hello all,
Only just started playing with hardened gentoo.
I have a few normal gentoo amd64 machines already running.
Can I add those to the distcc config for the hardened box?
Or are there indeed special things with the compiler on hardened gentoo?
Regards,
Coert
On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> Hmmm... currently I set xencons=hvc0 (also in /etc/inittab,
>>> s/tty0/hvc0/)
>>>
>>> I'll see what happens if I return them to tty0.
>>
>> Good luck there :)
>
> No joy. Changing xencons
On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 March 2011 14:04:23 Mr. Jarry wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > And if you don't care about barriers, j
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
-- snip --
>>> Hmm... I don't use kernel-modules in my Xen domu's (All are PV). I
>>> wonder
>>> if compiling them into the kernel migh
El 24/03/11 11:13, Coert Waagmeester escribió:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Only just started playing with hardened gentoo.
>
> I have a few normal gentoo amd64 machines already running.
> Can I add those to the distcc config for the hardened box?
No
> Or are there indeed special things with the compiler on
Hello,
Few month ago I played with that. My experience was that I need to use
hardened gentoo for distcc to work correctrly.
So I tried the virtualbox setup.
HTH
Best Regards.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Coert Waagmeester <
lgro...@waagmeester.co.za> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Only just
On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:19 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> -- snip --
>
Hmm... I don't use kernel-modules in my Xen domu's (All are
On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:57 pm, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:19 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>> -- snip --
>>
Can't hurt to try, now that I've gotten a bootable kernel. Can always
fallback to the previous one.
>>>
>>> Let me know how that goes.
>>>
>>
>> Compiling all the
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 19:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:19 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> -- snip --
>>
Hi,
I want to rsync all the directories and files that contain the date
"2011.03.03".
Everything else should not be copied.
I did a lot of experiments and read web pages, but can't solve this
conundrum.
kfir@goofy /tmp/rsync.test $ find
.
./b
./a
./a/aaa
./a/aaa/2011.03.03
./a/2011.03.04
./a/2011.
On Thu, March 24, 2011 2:10 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 19:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:19 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 20
On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> > md raid devices can do barriers. Don't know about lvm. But lvm is such
>> a
>> > can
>> > of worms I am surprised
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
md raid devices can do barriers. Don't know about lvm. But lvm is such
On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote:
I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
backups are good and they can restore.
Dale
Meh, boot a liveCD and fix it which took all of 15 minutes. I don't see
that
kashani wrote:
On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote:
I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
backups are good and they can restore.
Dale
Meh, boot a liveCD and fix it which took all of 15 minutes
On 03/24/2011 11:17 AM, Dale wrote:
> kashani wrote:
>> On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
>>> happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
>>> backups are good and they can restore.
>>>
>>> Dale
>>
>
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
> I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
> happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
> backups are good and they can restore.
What is this "mess up after an upgrade" of which you speak?
I've us
On Thursday 24 March 2011 15:38:02 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> > md raid devices can do barriers. Don't know about
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:19:39 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
> happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
> backups are good and they can restore.
I must be one of the luckiest people around. LVM messes up for ma
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:08:02 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
> > I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
> > happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
> > backups are good and they can restore.
>
> W
Hi,
is there any way to find completely all "orphaned" files on my
system (recursivelly from /)? I mean all files (and directories)
which do not belong to any ebuild installed...
I know, there is "qfile" with "-o" option, but its syntax is
not clear to me. I tried "qfile -o *" but that is appare
Bill Longman wrote:
On 03/24/2011 11:17 AM, Dale wrote:
kashani wrote:
On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote:
I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
backups are good and they can rest
Hi,
just to warn everyone of you readers, who use ~ARCH:
firefox 4.0 arrived with a dep to gconf.
A big show stopper for the all who do not want to have any gnome
dependencies, but want to have the new Firefox.
You have been warned
Sebastian
--
" Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " | _
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:09:27 +0100, Jarry wrote:
> I know, there is "qfile" with "-o" option, but its syntax is
> not clear to me. I tried "qfile -o *" but that is apparently
> not the correct syntax, as all I got were a few top-level
> subdirectories and nothing more...
qfile operates on the fil
One of my machines just saw a python-2.7 update and the ebuild was
good enough to remind me to run python-updater, but it didn't suggest
that I run eselect python and set the active version to 2.7.
Should this new version python be selected first as the active python
2 version and then run python-
Mark Knecht wrote:
One of my machines just saw a python-2.7 update and the ebuild was
good enough to remind me to run python-updater, but it didn't suggest
that I run eselect python and set the active version to 2.7.
Should this new version python be selected first as the active python
2 version
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:28:35PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > One of my machines just saw a python-2.7 update and the ebuild was
> > good enough to remind me to run python-updater, but it didn't suggest
> > that I run eselect python and set the active version to 2.7.
> >
> > Should
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Dale wrote:
> And if we should set python to 2.7, should we remove python-2.6? I don't
> think we want to break something, portage in particular. ;-)
I have no trace of python-2.6 on my system at this point and I'm
getting along just fine with 2.7 as my active
On 2011-03-24 22:37, Sebastian Günther wrote:
> just to warn everyone of you readers, who use ~ARCH:
> firefox 4.0 arrived with a dep to gconf.
>
> A big show stopper for the all who do not want to have any gnome
> dependencies, but want to have the new Firefox.
>
> You have been warned
Mostly
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:09:27 +0100, Jarry wrote:
I know, there is "qfile" with "-o" option, but its syntax is
not clear to me. I tried "qfile -o *" but that is apparently
not the correct syntax, as all I got were a few top-level
subdirectories and nothing more...
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >>> On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> md raid devices can do barriers.
On Thursday 24 March 2011 22:07:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:08:02 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
> > > I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
> > > happened to many others, see if you say the sam
37 matches
Mail list logo
