Hi again,
For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253, and
it worked one time. I had to reboot to move some things around and when
I rebooted, the GUI doesn't come up. The BIOS screen shows up and I c
Hi,
I have to power down one of my machines each day.
Booting it the other day fails from time to time.
On this (and all my machines) /usr is on an ext4 file system by its
own. It looks as if mounting /usr fails sometimes (silently).
The first unusual message is that it cannot find the file
/usr
On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
> card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253,
> and
> it worked one time. I had to reboot to move some things around and
> when
> I rebooted, the GUI d
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:40:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
> [ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
> [ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not exist,
> 0) [ 2082.101] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to obtain a shared memory
> identifier: Function not
> [ 20
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
Hi again,
For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253,
and
it worked one time. I had to reboot to move some things around and
when
I rebooted
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 09:55:37 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
> > card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253,
> > and
> > it worked one time. I ha
2010/12/15 Neil Bothwick :
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:40:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> [ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
>> [ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not exist,
>> 0) [ 2082.101] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to obtain a shared memory
>>
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:40:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
[ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
[ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not exist,
0) [ 2082.101] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to obtain a shared memory
identifier: F
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:03:58 Dale wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
> >> card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253,
> >> and
> >> it
Hi,
is it possible to emerge packages to a $ROOT directory mounted via NFS ?
The setup is
- machine A is equipped with a Quad core CPU
- machine B is equipped with an N330 Atom-CPU
- machine A is doing the system update on a local chroot-environment
for machine B and generates binary packages.
Dale [10-12-15 09:48]:
> Hi again,
>
> For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
> card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253, and
> it worked one time. I had to reboot to move some things around and
> when I rebooted, the GUI doesn't come up
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 09:55:37 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
Hi again,
For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253,
and
it worked one tim
Teemu Vartiainen wrote:
2010/12/15 Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:40:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
[ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
[ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not exist,
0) [ 2082.101] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:03:58 Dale wrote:
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
Hi again,
For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253,
> r...@smoker / # cat /media/disk/files/Xorg.0.log | grep EE
> [ 2081.047] Current Operating System: Linux fireball 2.6.36-gentoo-r4 #15
> SMP PREEMPT Mon Dec 13 01:15:13 CST 2010 x86_64
>(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
> [ 2081.048] (II) Loading extension MI
On 12/15/10 10:03:58, Dale wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
> >
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia
> GT220
> >> card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG
> W2253,
> >> and
> >> it worke
Helmut Jarausch [10-12-15 10:00]:
> Hi,
>
> I have to power down one of my machines each day.
> Booting it the other day fails from time to time.
> On this (and all my machines) /usr is on an ext4 file system by its
> own. It looks as if mounting /usr fails sometimes (silently).
> The first unu
On 12/15/10 10:26:16, Dale wrote:
>
> Got to go take care of some medical issues. Back in a bit.
>
I'd try to boot by SystemRescueCD and let it start X11
to rule out some hardware problems. (Version 1.6.4 is using
xorg-server-1.9.2)
Helmut.
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:26:16 Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:03:58 Dale wrote:
> >> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >>> On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
>
On 12/15/10 10:32:34, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch [10-12-15 10:00]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have to power down one of my machines each day.
> > Booting it the other day fails from time to time.
> > On this (and all my machines) /usr is on an ext4 file system by
> its
>
> > own. It l
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:17:01 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> First of all: In grub add a "2" at the end of the kernel command line.
> This will boot you into runlevel 2 (console) without trying to switch
> to X. This way you will have a "clean" machine with no confused nvidia
> driver hanging
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:17:01 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> 1.) Add "hal" to the USE flags of /etc/make.conf.
This is going to be fun ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
Few women admit their age. Few men act theirs.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Everyone here running kde+xinerama is able to drag Chromium through
screens without kwin bar on top, when Chromium is maximized/full
screen? Hard to believe i'm the one suffering this pain :'(
PD: Issue just happens with window maximized/full screen.
2010/11/16 Pau Peris :
> Hi, after updating Ch
> I confirmed with lsmod and even rmmod and modprobed it back in a few times.
> Still no joy. I really think it is either the card or the xorg.conf file.
> Thing is, when Mandriva failed to work, that makes me wonder about the
> card. It was using the generic "nv" driver and it still wouldn't w
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:12AM +0100, Thomas Drueke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to emerge packages to a $ROOT directory mounted via NFS ?
>
> The setup is
> - machine A is equipped with a Quad core CPU
> - machine B is equipped with an N330 Atom-CPU
> - machine A is doing the system updat
> I'll search for such a configuration problem, otherwise I'll create a
> bug report.
> >
>
Are you using rc_parallel="NO" ? (in /etc/rc.conf)
On 12/15/10 10:56:21, Adam Carter wrote:
> > I confirmed with lsmod and even rmmod and modprobed it back in a
> few
> times.
> > Still no joy. I really think it is either the card or the
> xorg.conf file.
> > Thing is, when Mandriva failed to work, that makes me wonder about
> the
> > card. It
On 12/15/10 11:03:43, Adam Carter wrote:
> > I'll search for such a configuration problem, otherwise I'll create
> a
> > bug report.
> > >
> >
>
> Are you using rc_parallel="NO" ? (in /etc/rc.conf)
No, why disable fast booting. If it turns out to be necessary it
would be a pity!
But I'll try it
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:54:14 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:17:01 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > 1.) Add "hal" to the USE flags of /etc/make.conf.
>
> This is going to be fun ;-)
Yes, I remember that episode on his last machine :)
--
Joost
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 12/15/10 10:26:16, Dale wrote:
Got to go take care of some medical issues. Back in a bit.
I'd try to boot by SystemRescueCD and let it start X11
to rule out some hardware problems. (Version 1.6.4 is using
xorg-server-1.9.2)
Helmut.
I tried booting i
> > IMO its a waste of time to worry about any of this other stuff - the
> > EE's in
> > the log file are ERRORs, directly pointing at serious issues with
> > missing
> > modules. So either the modules dont exist, or xorg cant find them.
> >
> > There's no evidence of a problem with the nvidia modu
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:10:03 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 12/15/10 10:56:21, Adam Carter wrote:
> > > I confirmed with lsmod and even rmmod and modprobed it back in a
> >
> > few
> > times.
> >
> > > Still no joy. I really think it is either the card or the
> >
> > xorg.conf file.
> >
J. Roeleveld wrote:
Dale,
Rather then rebooting, did you shut down the whole machine, eg. power off and
unplug power and then start it again?
I have, in the past, had issues where a card wasn't being "reset" properly
during a reboot and only a cold start would lead to correct behaviour.
--
Joo
Adam Carter wrote:
I confirmed with lsmod and even rmmod and modprobed it back in a
few times. Still no joy. I really think it is either the card or
the xorg.conf file. Thing is, when Mandriva failed to work, that
makes me wonder about the card. It was using the generic "nv"
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Helmut Jarausch <
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> On 12/15/10 11:03:43, Adam Carter wrote:
> > > I'll search for such a configuration problem, otherwise I'll create
> > a
> > > bug report.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Are you using rc_parallel="NO" ? (in /etc/rc.co
Interesting approach. I'll give that a try.
Thanks,
Thomas
Am 15.12.2010 10:56, schrieb YoYo Siska:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:12AM +0100, Thomas Drueke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it possible to emerge packages to a $ROOT directory mounted via NFS ?
>>
>> The setup is
>> - machine A is equipped
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:03:58 Dale wrote:
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
Hi again,
For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220
card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253,
> > I don't think that's true.
> > In my Xorg.0.log I do have
> >
> > (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
> >
> > (EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not exist, 0)
> >
> > and still, X11 is running just fine. I think these modules are
> > superfluous with a r
On 12/15/2010 11:18 AM, Dale wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> On 12/15/10 10:26:16, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Got to go take care of some medical issues. Back in a bit.
>>>
>>>
>> I'd try to boot by SystemRescueCD and let it start X11
>> to rule out some hardware problems. (Version 1.6.4 is us
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 12/15/10 10:56:21, Adam Carter wrote:
I confirmed with lsmod and even rmmod and modprobed it back in a
few
times.
Still no joy. I really think it is either the card or the
xorg.conf file.
Thing is, when Mandriva failed to work, t
I hope you are right. If it is missing modules, what do I need to do to fix
it? I did a emerge -e nvidia-drivers and everything built fine.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
Did u see my other email with this?
Can you locate libdri.so, libdri2.so and libglx.so on your file system? On
my ATI system they'
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 12/15/10 10:03:58, Dale wrote:
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 12/15/10 09:40:48, Dale wrote:
Hi again,
For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia
GT220
card in it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
> I hope you are right. If it is missing modules, what do I need to do to
> fix it? I did a emerge -e nvidia-drivers and everything built fine.
>
> fwiw xorg supplies the libdri modules, its not part of nvidia-drivers. For
some reason the path
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:20:20 Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Dale,
> >
> > Rather then rebooting, did you shut down the whole machine, eg. power off
> > and unplug power and then start it again?
> >
> > I have, in the past, had issues where a card wasn't being "reset"
> > properly
Yes, I have a N330 (zotec ION) with 3G ram, no local storage and swap
over nbd with portage and build area in /tmp which itself is on tmpfs.
Some packages (gcc and glibc in particular) require a lot of ram and
tmpfs to emerge so sometimes I have to disable tmpfs and use nfs
storage.
Because porta
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:30:46 Adam Carter wrote:
> > > I don't think that's true.
> > > In my Xorg.0.log I do have
> > >
> > > (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
> > >
> > > (EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not exist, 0)
> > >
> > > and still,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:20:33AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:10:03 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > On 12/15/10 10:56:21, Adam Carter wrote:
> > > > I confirmed with lsmod and even rmmod and modprobed it back in a
> > >
> > > few
> > > times.
> > >
> > > > Still no
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:45:34 Adam Carter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
> > I hope you are right. If it is missing modules, what do I need to do to
> > fix it? I did a emerge -e nvidia-drivers and everything built fine.
> >
> > fwiw xorg supplies the libd
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:22:33 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I hope you are right. If it is missing modules, what do I need to do
> to fix it? I did a emerge -e nvidia-drivers and everything built fine.
It's not. Those "errors" about dri are a standard feature of the nvidia
binary drivers. They do not ind
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:08:30 Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:40:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> [ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
> >> [ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not exist,
> >> 0) [ 2082.101
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:31:54 +0100, Pintér Tibor wrote:
> how about just checking the bloody Xorg logs to see what could have gone
> wrong? (/var/log/Xorg.0.log)
How about just reading the bloody first post in the thread where parts of
the log are quoted?
--
Neil Bothwick
TERROR: A female Kli
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:20:20 Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
Dale,
Rather then rebooting, did you shut down the whole machine, eg. power off
and unplug power and then start it again?
I have, in the past, had issues where a card wasn't being "reset"
prop
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:30:46 Adam Carter wrote:
I don't think that's true.
In my Xorg.0.log I do have
(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not exist, 0)
and still, X11 is running just f
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 09:03:58 Dale wrote:
> I knew if I updated the kernel I had to re-emerge the nvidia-drivers
> but I didn't know it was the other way around too.
No, it isn't. Not here at any rate.
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
Pintér Tibor wrote:
how about just checking the bloody Xorg logs to see what could have gone
wrong? (/var/log/Xorg.0.log)
That's where the errors came from that I posted in my first post. Here
is the results of the latest test. I shut down the rig and unplugged
the rig and monitor.
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 09:03:58 Dale wrote:
I knew if I updated the kernel I had to re-emerge the nvidia-drivers
but I didn't know it was the other way around too.
No, it isn't. Not here at any rate.
I tried it anyway. No change.
Dale
:-) :-)
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:08:30 Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:40:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
[ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
[ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri2" (module does not
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 12:39:27 Dale wrote:
> Pintér Tibor wrote:
> > how about just checking the bloody Xorg logs to see what could have gone
> > wrong? (/var/log/Xorg.0.log)
>
> That's where the errors came from that I posted in my first post. Here
> is the results of the latest test. I
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 12:39:27 Dale wrote:
> Pintér Tibor wrote:
> > how about just checking the bloody Xorg logs to see what could have gone
> > wrong? (/var/log/Xorg.0.log)
>
> That's where the errors came from that I posted in my first post. Here
> is the results of the latest test. I
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:12:23 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 12/15/10 11:03:43, Adam Carter wrote:
> > Are you using rc_parallel="NO" ? (in /etc/rc.conf)
>
> No, why disable fast booting. If it turns out to be necessary it
> would be a pity!
> But I'll try it for a while to see if it helps,
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 12:44:59 Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:08:30 Dale wrote:
> >> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:40:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
> [ 2081.057] (EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist,
> 0) [ 2
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
you seem to have misunderstood Mark. The power is delivered by the harddisks
case. AKA external power supply. esata has 0 power distribution capabilities.
Always remember: first unplug the sata cable, wait, then power. This allows the
device to flush the cache.
>
>>>
>> Result:
>> eve ~ # find /usr -name "libdri*"
>> /usr/lib64/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libdri.so
>> /usr/lib64/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libdri2.so
>>
>> eve ~ # cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep EE
>> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
>> (II) Loading exte
Stroller wrote:
On 14/12/2010, at 4:57pm, Mark Knecht wrote:
The SATA spec allows for hot plugging, so technically yes ...
My recollection of my understanding (multiple disclaimers) was that SATA
*allowed* for SATA hot-plugging but didn't *mandate* it.
If I could have found a SATA m
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 05:39:27AM -0600, Dale wrote:
...
>
> I'm attaching both the new just tried xorg.conf and the xorg.log
> file. No grep or anything this time.
>
> Let me know if you see anything fishy or that needs changing.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dale
...
>
> [ 2082.083] (II) Loading exte
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 12:39:27 Dale wrote:
Pintér Tibor wrote:
how about just checking the bloody Xorg logs to see what could have gone
wrong? (/var/log/Xorg.0.log)
That's where the errors came from that I posted in my first post. Here
is the resu
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 13:37:33 Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 12:39:27 Dale wrote:
> >> Pintér Tibor wrote:
> >>> how about just checking the bloody Xorg logs to see what could have
> >>> gone wrong? (/var/log/Xorg.0.log)
> >>
> >> That's where the erro
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 13:37:33 Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
Ok,
check your kernel config.
The following error into google gave me a hint,
[ 2082.101] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to obtain a shared memory identifier:
Function not
[ 2082.101] (EE) NVIDIA(0)
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 08:26:11 Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 13:37:33 Dale wrote:
> >> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >
> > Am glad you got it working. Enjoy the new machine :)
> >
> > --
> > Joost
>
> I went back and looked at the nvidia driver guide on g
Hi,
my /tmp has the permissions set to 1777 . And it is the mountpoint for
an extra partitions holding the stuff of '/tmp/'
When booting into single-user mode and unmounting /tmp and doing
a
ls -ld /tmp
it shows
drwxrwxrwt 45 root root 61440 2010-12-15 15:07 /tmp
BUT
as soon as I m
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 08:26:11 Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 13:37:33 Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
Am glad you got it working. Enjoy the new machine :)
--
Joost
I went back and looked a
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:13 on Wednesday 15 December 2010,
meino.cra...@gmx.de did opine thusly:
> Hi,
>
> my /tmp has the permissions set to 1777 . And it is the mountpoint for
> an extra partitions holding the stuff of '/tmp/'
>
>
> When booting into single-user mode and unmounting
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:13:31 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> And this happens to any mountpoint I mount that device on regardless
> of its perm settings before the mount
With nothing mounted on it, the mount point's permission are those of the
directory. As soon as you mount something on it,
Neil Bothwick [10-12-15 15:40]:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:13:31 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > And this happens to any mountpoint I mount that device on regardless
> > of its perm settings before the mount
>
> With nothing mounted on it, the mount point's permission are those of the
> di
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 15:41:25 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Neil Bothwick [10-12-15 15:40]:
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:13:31 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > And this happens to any mountpoint I mount that device on regardless
> > > of its perm settings before the mount
> >
> > Wit
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 13:33:03 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Not sure how much memory you have, but a 6Gig ramdisk mounted at
> /var/tmp/portage is sufficient to compile openoffice. That speeds
> things up even more ;)
The same size of tmpfs on /tmp also works even if you have only 4GB RAM,
as I
J. Roeleveld [10-12-15 16:00]:
> On Wednesday 15 December 2010 15:41:25 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Neil Bothwick [10-12-15 15:40]:
> > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:13:31 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > > And this happens to any mountpoint I mount that device on regardless
> > > > of its p
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 16:20:32 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> J. Roeleveld [10-12-15 16:00]:
> > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 15:41:25 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > Neil Bothwick [10-12-15 15:40]:
> > > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:13:31 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > > > And this
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Dale wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220 card in
> it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253, and it worked
> one time. I had to reboot to move some things around and when I rebooted,
> the G
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Wednesday 15 December 2010,
meino.cra...@gmx.de did opine thusly:
> J. Roeleveld [10-12-15 16:00]:
> > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 15:41:25 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > Neil Bothwick [10-12-15 15:40]:
> > > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:13:31 +0100, mei
E-SATA != SATA
Nah. They are *exactly* the same.
Evidently someone realized that the original SATA connector is way too
fragile to be regularly used to plug/unplug a cable by hand, so they
engineered in some features which make it a bit more resilient. But
apart from the shape of the co
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:20 PM, James wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm going to get myself an HD video camera, that
> works well with open source software on Gentoo.
> Problem is (head scratching), I recall when I went
> through this some years ago I had lots of problems
> making a decision that worked wit
The SATA spec allows for hot plugging, so technically yes ...
My recollection of my understanding (multiple disclaimers) was that SATA
*allowed* for SATA hot-plugging but didn't *mandate* it.
a good summary of the hardware/driver situation wrt hotplugging can be
found here:
https://ata.wiki
Hi,
a friend of mine asked me to prepare a small server for him.
Unfortunatelly he can not afford to buy brand-name server so
he asked me to build one for him, from "consumer" components
(yes, I already warned him about "zero-support" consequences).
It should be some kind of "multi-purpose" serve
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 05:54:40 Dale wrote:
>
> According to the mobo manual, if I enable AHCI, it is hot swappable.
and enabling AHCI is the only sane option. So do it.
> I
> just ain't to comfy doing it. I'd like to see it done with no smoke
> getting out first.
no smoke. Worst case:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 December 2010 05:54:40 Dale wrote:
>
>>
>> According to the mobo manual, if I enable AHCI, it is hot swappable.
>
> and enabling AHCI is the only sane option. So do it.
>
>> I
>> just ain't to comfy doing it. I'd like
The following lines creates an auditWorldFile.log log file which will
show packages requires by other packages, so theones you can safely
remove.
#!/bin/bash
n=`wc -l /var/lib/portage/world|awk '{ print $1 }'`;
for i in `seq 1 $n`;do
pkg=`cat /var/lib/portage/world|head -n$i|tail -n1`;
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 05:54:40 Dale wrote:
According to the mobo manual, if I enable AHCI, it is hot swappable.
and enabling AHCI is the only sane option. So do it.
I
just ain't
Jarry [10-12-15 19:08]:
> Hi,
>
> a friend of mine asked me to prepare a small server for him.
> Unfortunatelly he can not afford to buy brand-name server so
> he asked me to build one for him, from "consumer" components
> (yes, I already warned him about "zero-support" consequences).
> It should
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Dale wrote:
Hi again,
For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220 card in
it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253, and it worked
one time. I had to reboot to move some things around and when I
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 15 December 2010 05:54:40 Dale wrote:
>>>
>>>
According to the mobo manual, if I enable AHCI, it is hot swappable.
>>>
>
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 13:33:03 J. Roeleveld wrote:
Not sure how much memory you have, but a 6Gig ramdisk mounted at
/var/tmp/portage is sufficient to compile openoffice. That speeds
things up even more ;)
The same size of tmpfs on /tmp also works even if
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 12:24:58 Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 15 December 2010 05:54:40 Dale wrote:
> >>> According to the mobo manual, if I enable AHCI, it is hot swappable.
> >>
> >> and enabl
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Jarry [10-12-15 19:08]:
Hi,
a friend of mine asked me to prepare a small server for him.
Unfortunatelly he can not afford to buy brand-name server so
he asked me to build one for him, from "consumer" components
(yes, I already warned him about "zero-support" cons
On 12/15/2010 09:35 AM, Jarry wrote:
> So what should I pick for him? i7-950, or phenom-1100t?
> Or yet some cheap 4/6-core opteron 4xxx/6xxx?
Uh oh..don your flameproof underwear and open the floodgates
I've not used the new six-core AMDs but I love my XII 940. And with
Intel's new plum
Dale [10-12-15 19:52]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >Jarry [10-12-15 19:08]:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>a friend of mine asked me to prepare a small server for him.
> >>Unfortunatelly he can not afford to buy brand-name server so
> >>he asked me to build one for him, from "consumer" components
> >
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 December 2010 13:33:03 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> Not sure how much memory you have, but a 6Gig ramdisk mounted at
>> /var/tmp/portage is sufficient to compile openoffice. That speeds
>> things up even more ;)
>
> The same size
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> For those mot up to date. I built a new rig that has a Nvidia GT220 card
>>> in
>>> it. I bought a brand new monitor this morning, a LG W2253, and
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 13:33:03 J. Roeleveld wrote:
Not sure how much memory you have, but a 6Gig ramdisk mounted at
/var/tmp/portage is sufficient to compile openoffice. That speeds
things up even mo
On 2010-12-15, Andrea Conti wrote:
>> E-SATA != SATA
>
> Nah. They are *exactly* the same.
Not according to Wikipedia -- it says the electrical specs for eSATA
are different than the specs for "normal" SATA. I've seen that stated
in other places as well. I don't have copies of the two spec
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
