On Wednesday 01 December 2010 19:55:03 Fatih Tümen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 23:16, Alan McKinnon
> wrote: [..]
>
> > *and* to be able to configure
> > windows so they don;t bounce all over the place when getting focus
>
> I knew I read somewhere that was possible.. :-) but failed to disa
On 2010-11-25, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-11-25, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:02:10 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>>> I thought about using a customized systemrescuecd, but that takes ages
>>> to boot (almost 5 minutes). This CD is intended as something a
>>> custome
Can anyone tell me how determine what these kind of useless names
really mean?
>From df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
/dev/root 1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
How are you supposed to tell what actual device these thing
> How are you supposed to tell what actual device these things are on.
# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
# ls -al /dev/root
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Oct 21 22:56 /dev/root -> md2
so rootfs is on my /dev/md2 device
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 15:53 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how determine what these kind of useless names
> really mean?
>
> From df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> rootfs1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
> /dev/root 1.9G 283M 1.6G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2010, at 08:23, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how determine what these kind of useless names
> really mean?
>
> From df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> rootfs1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
>
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:53:11 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> From df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> rootfs1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
> /dev/root 1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
>
> How are you supposed to tell what actual device these things are on.
%
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:46:20 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> However version 1.7.1 (with the fix) hasn't been released yet.
> I am surprised since the released version doesn't work with
> python 2.7.
1.7.1_beta2 is in portage and working with 2.7.
--
Neil Bothwick
Everywhere is walking distanc
On 12/03/10 08:24, Indexer wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2010, at 08:23, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> > Can anyone tell me how determine what these kind of useless names
> > really mean?
>
> > From df -h
> > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > rootfs1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
>
Harry Putnam wrote:
Can anyone tell me how determine what these kind of useless names
really mean?
> From df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
/dev/root 1.9G 283M 1.6G 15% /
How are you supposed to tell what ac
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:21:50 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
> Out of curiousity, why don't I have a "rootfs" entry? I just have the
> actual device name. You guys seem to be assuming that having "rootfs"
> in the list is a normal thing, but it's not in my list?
Are you using baselayout 1 or 2? ISTR thi
Jake Moe writes:
>> > I know I can look in fstab... but that is something of a crap shoot
>> > since it is user configured.
>>
>> So? It should not be touchable by human hands unless they have root.
>> The only way this would change is if someone changed it, and you can
>> easily track who with
On 3/12/2010, at 12:51am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:21:50 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
>
>> Out of curiousity, why don't I have a "rootfs" entry? I just have the
>> actual device name. You guys seem to be assuming that having "rootfs"
>> in the list is a normal thing, but it's not
Harry Putnam writes:
> Jake Moe writes:
Jake, I am soo sorry for seeming to aim my joking post at you when it
was Mr. Indexer who seemed to be needing a little ribbing.
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:46:20 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> However version 1.7.1 (with the fix) hasn't been released yet.
>> I am surprised since the released version doesn't work with
>> python 2.7.
>
> 1.7.1_beta2 is in portage and working with 2.7.
Yes indeed it is
On 12/03/10 12:38, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Harry Putnam writes:
>
>> Jake Moe writes:
> Jake, I am soo sorry for seeming to aim my joking post at you when it
> was Mr. Indexer who seemed to be needing a little ribbing.
>
>
Not a problem, I got what you were aiming for...
Jake Moe
16 matches
Mail list logo
