Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2010, Dale wrote:
I'm planning to build a new rig. My current rig is about 7 or 8 years
old now and it needs to be updated. Current rig is AMD 2500+ with 2Gbs
of ram and a Abit NF7 v2.0 mobo. Couple hard drives too.
New build #1 with link
Hi,
I am trying to use jack/qjackctrl with Zynaddsubfx and Rosegarden to
play some midi stuff...
It works...for a few seconds.
Then Rosegarden dies.
Jack list this:
09:36:36.740 Patchbay deactivated.
09:36:36.751 Statistics reset.
09:36:36.789 JACK is starting...
09:36:36.790 /usr/bin/jackd -R
2010/11/26 Stroller :
> Hi there,
>
> As per subject, what's the best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk
> activity, please?
>
> Or perhaps a better question would be: what approaches are available?
>
> Presently my main Linux system is basically just a storage server with a
> *really s
On Saturday 27 November 2010, Matthew Marlowe wrote:
> Volker,
>
> > Even my rig - hotter, doesn't reach 300W when I artificially torture the
> > system. Normal 'max' load is in 200W range. An normal desktop? Under 100.
>
> OK -- just to find out the truth I've attached a kill-a-watt to my curren
> My immediate reaction was to consider the recent "200-line patch to kernel
> => superkernel" thread:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/221770
>
>
As well as following Florian's instructions there (it helps a lot), you
should run 2.6.36 as there have been improvements in the last
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Saturday 27 November 2010, Matthew Marlowe wrote:
Volker,
Even my rig - hotter, doesn't reach 300W when I artificially torture the
system. Normal 'max' load is in 200W range. An normal desktop? Under 100.
OK -- just to find out the truth I've a
On Saturday 27 November 2010 07:44:29 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I never want to go back to those days either :-)
Oh, I don't know. I wasn't bad at Astral assembler. Mind you, nostalgia
isn't what it used to be.
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
cause panics on two different x86 boxen.
Now that 2.6.35 has gone stable so I tried it again and I'm getting a
kernel panic complaining about VFS unable to mount root fs:
==
VFS: Cannot open roo
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
> I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
> cause panics on two different x86 boxen.
>
> Now that 2.6.35 has gone stable so I tried it again and I'm getting a
> kernel panic complaining about VFS unable to mount root fs:
>
Am 27.11.2010 11:58, schrieb Adam Carter:
>
> My immediate reaction was to consider the recent "200-line patch to
> kernel => superkernel" thread:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/221770
>
>
> As well as following Florian's instructions there (it helps a lot), you
On 11/26/2010 05:57 PM, Stroller wrote:
Hi there,
As per subject, what's the best way to improve interactivity with
heavy disk activity, please?
Or perhaps a better question would be: what approaches are
available?
[...]
But I have also heard of `ionice` in the past:
http://linux.die.net/man/1
Hi!
I'm trying to upgrade dhcpcd to 5.2.8 (from 4.0.15). Currently it's not
working so good... It compiles fine, gets a lease when rebooting... but
ntp-client is not able to sync (to a remote ntp-server)... I'm also
running a local maradns for dns-caching but no lookups are possible
(with 5.2.8).
On 11/27/10 17:51, Adam Carter wrote:
* package sys-apps/portage-2.1.9.24 NOT merged
*
* Detected file collision(s):
*
* /usr/bin/quickpkg
Should I remove the quickpkg to install new portage or comment-out
"collision-protect" in make.conf?
I just ran the same update (and it reported
On Saturday 27 November 2010 07:37:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 08:39 on Saturday 27 November 2010, Hung
> Dang
>
> did opine thusly:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying to get E17 on my computer using this guide
> > http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/E17. I have also added s
On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
> > I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
> > cause panics on two different x86 boxen.
> >
> > Now that 2.6.35 has gone stable so I tried it again and I'm getti
I thought Gentoo was supposed to be bleeding edge when it came to all
things Linux.
Why would something like E17, (or any package,) still need to be applied
through an overlay after all this time instead of just being in portage?
I thought building from scratch was to be the way to put a package
t
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
>> > I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
>> > cause panics on two different x86 boxen.
>> >
>> > Now that 2.6.
On 11/27/10 09:56, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 07:37:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 08:39 on Saturday 27 November 2010, Hung
>> Dang
>>
>> did opine thusly:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am trying to get E17 on my computer using this guide
>>> http://en.gentoo-wik
Hello,
I am trying to install wine on my system which I recently changed from
no-multilib to multilib; so this may be causing this problem. The emerge
issue is here
checking for GL/gl.h... yes
checking for GL/glx.h... yes
checking for GL/glu.h... yes
checking for up-to-date OpenGL version... yes
On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:53:21 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
> >> > I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
> >>
On 11/27/10, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to install wine on my system which I recently changed from
> no-multilib to multilib; so this may be causing this problem. The emerge
> issue is here
>
> checking for GL/gl.h... yes
> checking for GL/glx.h... yes
> checking for GL/gl
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:53:21 Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mick wrote:
>> > On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
>> >> > I haven't had much luc
On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:57:45 Hung Dang wrote:
> On 11/27/10 09:56, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 November 2010 07:37:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Apparently, though unproven, at 08:39 on Saturday 27 November 2010, Hung
> >> Dang
> >>
> >> did opine thusly:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I am
On 11/27/2010 01:43 PM, Arttu V. wrote:
> On 11/27/10, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to install wine on my system which I recently changed from
>> no-multilib to multilib; so this may be causing this problem. The emerge
>> issue is here
>>
>> checking for GL/gl.h... yes
>
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:34 on Saturday 27 November 2010, sean did
opine thusly:
> I thought Gentoo was supposed to be bleeding edge when it came to all
> things Linux.
>
> Why would something like E17, (or any package,) still need to be applied
> through an overlay after all this time
On 11/27/2010 11:00 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to install wine on my system which I recently changed from
no-multilib to multilib; so this may be causing this problem. The emerge
issue is here
checking for GL/gl.h... yes
checking for GL/glx.h... yes
checking for GL/glu.h..
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:56 on Saturday 27 November 2010, Mick did
opine thusly:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 07:37:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 08:39 on Saturday 27 November 2010, Hung
> > Dang
> >
> > did opine thusly:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am
On 11/27/2010 03:03 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> On 11/27/2010 01:43 PM, Arttu V. wrote:
>> On 11/27/10, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to install wine on my system which I recently changed from
>>> no-multilib to multilib; so this may be causing this problem. The em
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:46 on Saturday 27 November 2010, Joseph did
opine thusly:
> On 11/27/10 17:51, Adam Carter wrote:
> >> * package sys-apps/portage-2.1.9.24 NOT merged
> >>
> >> *
> >> * Detected file collision(s):
> >> *
> >> * /usr/bin/quickpkg
> >>
> >> Should I
On 11/27/2010 02:35 PM, walt wrote:
> On 11/27/2010 11:00 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to install wine on my system which I recently changed from
>> no-multilib to multilib; so this may be causing this problem. The emerge
>> issue is here
>>
>> checking for GL/gl.h...
Hello,
I just added a new drive to an existing system
using an ext4 (journaled) file system.
I was not sure about using the -j option
so I did it anyway. Correct assumption?
Irrelevant? no examples to ponder.
comments or observations on the -j option
with ext4?
James
On 27/11/2010, at 4:29pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> ...
> The way I solved the I/O problems is to use the sys-kernel/ck-sources kernel
> (2.6.36-r3). It shouldn't be necessary to use ionice and schedtool for most
> tasks, but I use it for portage with this in make.conf:
>
> PORTAGE_NICENESS=1
Just for info, on my 64-bit system I just updated Portage w/o any problem:
root:525 etc> equery belongs /usr/bin/quickpkg
[ Searching for file(s) /usr/bin/quickpkg in *... ]
sys-apps/portage-2.1.9.24 (/usr/bin/quickpkg ->
../lib64/portage/bin/quickpkg)
root:526 etc> ls -l /usr/bin/qui
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Stroller
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> As per subject, what's the best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk
> activity, please?
>
> Or perhaps a better question would be: what approaches are available?
>
> Presently my main Linux system is basically just a storag
2010/11/27 James :
> Hello,
>
> I just added a new drive to an existing system
> using an ext4 (journaled) file system.
>
> I was not sure about using the -j option
> so I did it anyway. Correct assumption?
> Irrelevant? no examples to ponder.
>
> comments or observations on the -j option
> with e
On 11/27/2010 11:34 PM, Stroller wrote:
On 27/11/2010, at 4:29pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
...
The way I solved the I/O problems is to use the sys-kernel/ck-sources kernel
(2.6.36-r3). It shouldn't be necessary to use ionice and schedtool for most
tasks, but I use it for portage with this in
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Stroller
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> As per subject, what's the best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk
> activity, please?
>
> Or perhaps a better question would be: what approaches are available?
>
> Presently my main Linux system is basically just a storag
On 27/11/2010, at 10:22pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 11/27/2010 11:34 PM, Stroller wrote:
>> On 27/11/2010, at 4:29pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> ...
>>> The way I solved the I/O problems is to use the sys-kernel/ck-sources
>>> kernel (2.6.36-r3). It shouldn't be necessary to use ionice an
On 11/27/10 21:45, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[snip]
>> I just ran the same update (and it reported it was going ahead with the
>
>update despite the collision). Looks like quickpkg is now in portage;
>
># qfile /usr/bin/quickpkg
>sys-apps/portage (/usr/bin/quickpkg)
I just "--sync" and it stopping a
Hello,
Here's some thing that I'm at a loss to understand.
cpu family : 15
model : 75
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 1000.000
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat
Maciej Grela gmail.com> writes:
> Irrelevant for running mkfs.ext4. The journal is always created in
> this case. This option has been used for mke2fs.
I thought so, but googling nor man pages bear this out.
So using the -j option did not effect anything, as the
new disk is just fine with e
lør, 27 11 2010 kl. 23:52 +, skrev James:
> Hello,
>
> Here's some thing that I'm at a loss to understand.
>
> cpu family : 15
> model : 75
> model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+
> stepping: 2
> cpu MHz : 1000.000
> flags :
On 11/28/2010 01:03 AM, Stroller wrote:
On 27/11/2010, at 10:22pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
The ck patch set does not support group scheduling anyway;
Now I'm a little more confused. Does `ionice` need the CFQ scheduler?
Nope. I/O scheduling priorities are part of the I/O scheduler, not t
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:07 PM, James wrote:
>
> I just added a new drive to an existing system
> using an ext4 (journaled) file system.
>
> I was not sure about using the -j option
> so I did it anyway. Correct assumption?
> Irrelevant? no examples to ponder.
>
> comments or observations on the
On 11/27/2010 03:55 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> On 11/27/2010 02:35 PM, walt wrote:
>> On 11/27/2010 11:00 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to install wine on my system which I recently changed from
>>> no-multilib to multilib; so this may be causing this problem.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 01:03 AM, Stroller wrote:
>>
>> On 27/11/2010, at 10:22pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>>
>>> The ck patch set does not support group scheduling anyway;
>>
>> Now I'm a little more confused. Does `ionice` need the CFQ schedule
On 11/27/10 11:57, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:57:45 Hung Dang wrote:
>> On 11/27/10 09:56, Mick wrote:
>>> On Saturday 27 November 2010 07:37:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:39 on Saturday 27 November 2010, Hung
Dang
did opine thusly
47 matches
Mail list logo
