On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:55:40 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
> somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
> I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
Define better!
Easier to set up, probably.
More flexibl
On Monday 07 June 2010 00:33:44 James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have this ati card. I'm having trouble finding a stable
> ati-driver + xorg-server combination that will compile.
>
>
> Any recommendations as to open source drivers or getting ati-drivers
> happy with 9.x or 10.x is most welcome. I rea
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 12:47:37 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> At Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:52:14 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:10:06 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> >> I am now ready to install linux (and grub).
> >> Can I have all of linux on extended partitions? Something like
> >>
My modules file contains;
modules="vmmon vmnet vmblock vmci vsock"
modules_2_6="${modules_2_6} acpi-cpufreq"
module_acpi_cpufreq_args_2_6=""
modules_2_6="${modules_2_6} fuse"
module_fuse_args_2_6=""
modules_2_6="${modules_2_6} usbhid"
module_usbhid_args_2_6="quirks=0x05ac:0x1294:0x04"
But the
> while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
> somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
> I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
>
> Any better program for that task?
I prefer 'maildrop' for syntax reasons, but I don't claim it's better or worse.
-
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 04:00:01 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote about
[gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?:
>while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
>somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
>I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
>
>Any be
On Samstag 12 Juni 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
> somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
> I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
>
> Any better program for that task?
not using all that
* meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there
> somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format).
> I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3.
Is there anything you dont like in procmail ?
cu
--
---
I have two Gentoo Hosts that are (should be) 100% equal except on the
following points:
a) Hostname
b) IP
c) One Host has FEATURES="fixpackages buildpkg" while the other has
FEATURES="fixpackages"
As far as I know I have no other differences between the systems (same USE
flags, s
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dan Johansson wrote:
[snip]
> Host-A:
> # eix -I portage-uti
> [I] app-portage/portage-utils
> Available versions: 0.2.1{tbz2} 0.3.1{tbz2} ~0.4 {static}
> Installed versions: 0.3.1{tbz2}(20:46:47 06/10/10)(-static)
> Homepage: http://www.ge
Dan Johansson schrieb am 12.06.2010 17:28:
> I have two Gentoo Hosts that are (should be) 100% equal except on the
> following points:
> a)Hostname
> b)IP
> c)One Host has FEATURES="fixpackages buildpkg" while the other has
> FEATURES="fixpackages"
>
> As far as I know I have no othe
Hi David,
Your setup looks fairly similar to my own, but I am intrigued by the
differences.
On 12 Jun 2010, at 12:35, David W Noon wrote:
... Dovecot, but quickly replaced by dbmail.
Can I ask you why?
I have found the author of Dovecot to be wonderfully responsive,
pushing out a fix f
On Saturday 12 June 2010 18.22:06 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Dan Johansson schrieb am 12.06.2010 17:28:
> > I have two Gentoo Hosts that are (should be) 100% equal except on the
> > following points:
> > a) Hostname
> > b) IP
> > c) One Host has FEATURES="fixpackages buildpkg" while the other has
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:40:01 +0200, Stroller wrote about [gentoo-user]
Anything better than procmail?:
>Hi David,
>
>Your setup looks fairly similar to my own, but I am intrigued by the
>differences.
Okay. I have been using all kinds of software for handling email,
dating back to my OS/2 days
On 06/11/2010 01:55 AM, SpaceCake wrote:
Hi,
After a few week of testing 2.30 release of Gnome using Gnome Overlay, I've
decided
> to revert back to the stable tree. Now almost everything is compiled
successfully,
> but a few ebuilds cannot be compiled. The only similarity I can found is this
On 06/12/2010 02:27 AM, Adam wrote:
My modules file contains;
Which 'modules' file do you mean?
modules="vmmon vmnet vmblock vmci vsock"
modules_2_6="${modules_2_6} acpi-cpufreq"
module_acpi_cpufreq_args_2_6=""
modules_2_6="${modules_2_6} fuse"
module_fuse_args_2_6=""
modules_2_6="${module
Brandon Vargo writes:
> do. When I go to find code that I have written, I do not remember
> variable names, lines of code, etc that I can match with a regular
> expression. Thus, that kind of search is pointless for me. I remember
> what the code does, the project for which I wrote the code, and
Brandon Vargo writes:
> [1]: http://www.google.com/codesearch
> [2]: http://beagle-project.org/
Acckk, I forgot to thank you for the URLS you posted.. thanks
>> My modules file contains;
>
> Which 'modules' file do you mean?
/etc/conf.d/modules
>> modules="vmmon vmnet vmblock vmci vsock"
>>
>> modules_2_6="${modules_2_6} acpi-cpufreq"
>> module_acpi_cpufreq_args_2_6=""
>>
>> modules_2_6="${modules_2_6} fuse"
>> module_fuse_args_2_6=""
>>
>> modules_2
In today's economy, more and more clients are looking for low cost
alternatives to Windows servers. I recently pitched the idea of offering
linux-based servers to our clients as replacements for Windows Servers.
I've checked out Redhat Directory Server and installed that, though having
some troub
20 matches
Mail list logo
