On 01/03/10 16:39, Lie Ryan wrote:
> I've found a few people referencing to a "30-day stabilization policy"
> which basically says a package must be at least 30-days-old to be
> considered for stabilization, but is there any document that serves as
> an official guideline/checklist on how to consid
Paul Hartman writes:
> - utilizing device labels and/or volume labels instead of hoping
> /dev/sda stays /dev/sda always
Good idea. Or use LVM.
> - better partitioning scheme than my current root, boot, home (need
> portage on its own, maybe /var as well?)
I like to have many partitions. When m
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:32 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
> fisrt see if proc and your kernel has it right, do:
> cat /proc/acpi/video/GFX0/DD02/brightness
i found a similar file at /proc/acpi/video/VID1/LCD0/brightness. i
think they are the same :)
>
> should give something like
>
> levels: 13 25 38 50
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:35:42 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > - best filesystem for portage? something compressed or with small
> > cluster size maybe.
>
> I think reiserfs with the notail option is recommended.
The data I've seen indicates that ext2 is fastest, that's what I use.
There's no nee
On 3/2/10, walt wrote:
> This article was a big surprise to me. Am I the last one to hear about this
> stuff?
>
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10461670-16.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
If you're expecting a discussion then perhaps you'd care to narrow it
down a bit: which part o
On 1 March 2010 18:09, Mick wrote:
> On 1 March 2010 15:04, Peter Ruskin wrote:
>> Thanks for the howto, Mick. I followed it on my Windows Vista Home
>> Premium 64; got "The operation completed successfully" all the way
>> through, but on reboot I don't get a boot menu.
>
> Can you please post
On 2 March 2010 10:10, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:35:42 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
>
>> > - best filesystem for portage? something compressed or with small
>> > cluster size maybe.
>>
>> I think reiserfs with the notail option is recommended.
>
> The data I've seen indicates tha
On Monday 01 March 2010 18:30:24 Tanstaafl wrote:
> Well... my local overlays (that I set up a long time ago) are
> there... and portage obviously 'touches' those, so... should I move
> them as well?
I wouldn't. I'm happy with the new default arrangement: mainstream
packages under /usr/portage;
On Monday 01 March 2010 22:47:36 Neil Walker wrote:
> There was a patch for the 190.53 driver released yesterday to make it
> work with 2.6.33.
Can you give a link please? I'm having trouble compiling nvidia-drivers
with 2.6.33 and I can't see much on the nvidia site.
--
Rgds
Peter.
On 03/01/10 18:09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:07 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf and change the
locations there.
That didn't work for me; the current layman script still
references the old location; which is why I added the soft link.
On 03/02/2010 04:23 AM, Arttu V. wrote:
On 3/2/10, walt wrote:
This article was a big surprise to me. Am I the last one to hear about this
stuff?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10461670-16.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
If you're expecting a discussion then perhaps you'd care
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:09:06 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > There was a patch for the 190.53 driver released yesterday to make it
> > work with 2.6.33.
>
> Can you give a link please? I'm having trouble compiling nvidia-drivers
> with 2.6.33 and I can't see much on the nvidia site.
emerge --
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:07 PM, walt wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 04:23 AM, Arttu V. wrote:
>>
>> On 3/2/10, walt wrote:
>>>
>>> This article was a big surprise to me. Am I the last one to hear about
>>> this
>>> stuff?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10461670-16.html?part=rss&subj=news
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:30:18AM +0100, Justin wrote:
> On 01/03/10 16:39, Lie Ryan wrote:
> > I've found a few people referencing to a "30-day stabilization policy"
> > which basically says a package must be at least 30-days-old to be
> > considered for stabilization, but is there any document t
Lie Ryan said:
> I've been running several ~arch-ed packages that appears to be compile
> and runs fine on my machine and would like to vote them for
> stabilization. Is it enough to just open a bug issue and pray that the
> arch manager would notice?
The general policy is here:
http://devmanual
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:41 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:30:18AM +0100, Justin wrote:
>> On 01/03/10 16:39, Lie Ryan wrote:
>> > I've found a few people referencing to a "30-day stabilization policy"
>> > which basically says a package must be at least 30-days-old to be
>>
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:56:58AM -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> On 03/01/10 18:09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:07 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> >
> >>> Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf and change the
> >>> locations there.
> >>
> >> That didn't work for me; the curren
Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> There was a patch for the 190.53 driver released yesterday to make it
>> work with 2.6.33.
>>
>
> Can you give a link please? I'm having trouble compiling nvidia-drivers
> with 2.6.33 and I can't see much on the nvidia site.
>
emerge =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-19
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 01 March 2010 22:47:36 Neil Walker wrote:
>
>> There was a patch for the 190.53 driver released yesterday to make it
>> work with 2.6.33.
>
> Can you give a link please? I'm having trouble compiling nvidia-drivers
> with 2.6.33 and
On 03/03/2010 04:52 AM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Lie Ryan said:
>> I've been running several ~arch-ed packages that appears to be compile
>> and runs fine on my machine and would like to vote them for
>> stabilization. Is it enough to just open a bug issue and pray that the
>> arch manager would notic
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 19:07:21 walt wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 04:23 AM, Arttu V. wrote:
> > On 3/2/10, walt wrote:
> >> This article was a big surprise to me. Am I the last one to hear about
> >> this stuff?
> >>
> >> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10461670-16.html?part=rss&subj=new
> >> s&ta
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 09:07 -0800, walt wrote:
> I've also not heard of the "NoSQL" movement before
The "NoSQL" movement is long-lasting and continuous. It just changes
names every few years :-)
Hi,
There's a vBulletin forum I frequent:
http://forum.thinkbike.co.za
and my usual browser is Konqueror (just because kparts makes it so
convenient). Every so often, with no pattern I can find, this site hangs
Konqueror - cpu goes to 100% and the browser stays unresponsive.
I've tried variou
On Dienstag 02 März 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a vBulletin forum I frequent:
>
> http://forum.thinkbike.co.za
>
> and my usual browser is Konqueror (just because kparts makes it so
> convenient). Every so often, with no pattern I can find, this site hangs
> Konqueror - cpu goes
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Dienstag 02 März 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi,
There's a vBulletin forum I frequent:
http://forum.thinkbike.co.za
and my usual browser is Konqueror (just because kparts makes it so
convenient). Every so often, with no
Alan McKinnon writes:
> On Monday 01 March 2010 06:16:09 Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon writes:
>> > FWIW, Solaris syslogd is like other basic tools on Solaris:
>> > standards compliant in that it caters for the lowest common
>> > denominator that comprises Unix. Which is to say, almost a
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 20:37:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a vBulletin forum I frequent:
>
> http://forum.thinkbike.co.za
>
> and my usual browser is Konqueror (just because kparts makes it so
> convenient). Every so often, with no pattern I can find, this site hangs
> Konqueror -
For quite a long time I've been using things like:
vga=0x31A
On the kernel line in grub.conf
Its a hexidecimal system drawn info in this (partial) chart I found
somewhere in the kernel documentation long ago.
## 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024
## 256 0x301 0x303 0x3050x
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 00:48:36 Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 March 2010 20:37:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's a vBulletin forum I frequent:
> >
> > http://forum.thinkbike.co.za
> >
> > and my usual browser is Konqueror (just because kparts makes it so
> > convenient). Every so
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 00:26:35 Harry Putnam wrote:
> Alan McKinnon writes:
> > On Monday 01 March 2010 06:16:09 Harry Putnam wrote:
> >> Alan McKinnon writes:
> >> > FWIW, Solaris syslogd is like other basic tools on Solaris:
> >> > standards compliant in that it caters for the lowest common
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> For quite a long time I've been using things like:
> vga=0x31A
>
> On the kernel line in grub.conf
>
> Its a hexidecimal system drawn info in this (partial) chart I found
> somewhere in the kernel documentation long ago.
>
> ## 640x480
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 23:29:19 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Dienstag 02 März 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's a vBulletin forum I frequent:
> >
> > http://forum.thinkbike.co.za
> >
> > and my usual browser is Konqueror (just because kparts makes it so
> > convenient). Ev
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 23:53:29 Dale wrote:
> > without looking at that site - is there any flash stuff? What about
> > javascript? nspluginviewer is still a bitch - and buggy js can cause a
> > tremendous amount of cpu load.
> >
> >
>
> Not knowing the site either, my weather radar site loc
On 22 February 2010 01:33, daid kahl wrote:
>>> I just installed zsh recently and was working on making the switch
>>> over from bash for my daily user, provided I can get a few things
>>> worked out.
>
>> Zsh is a wonderfull shell, but it does have a steep learning curve, due to
>> its
>> many f
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 23:53:29 Dale wrote:
without looking at that site - is there any flash stuff? What about
javascript? nspluginviewer is still a bitch - and buggy js can cause a
tremendous amount of cpu load.
hi,
both lvm2 and zfs are copy-on-write snapshot system. do we have a
write-redirect snapshot system on linux?
--
Best Regards,
David Shen
http://twitter.com/davidshen84/
Hi there
I am trying to build a minimal system for my 128MB USB stick, based on uclibc.
I’m in the process of rebuilding system after upgrading gcc from 4.1 to 4.3.
During the upgrade, linux-headers was updated from 2.6.23-r3 to 2.6.30-r1.
After such an update, the c library needs to be rebuilt a
37 matches
Mail list logo
