On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:29 PM, walt wrote:
> On 12/14/2009 01:08 PM, GerhardosG wrote:
>> /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc: line 61: xterm: command not found
>> /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc: line 62: exec: xterm: not found
>
> ^^
> That last line is the prob
On Monday 08 February 2010 21:34:01 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Valmor de Almeida
wrote:
> > Mark Knecht wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> >>This has been helpful for me. I'm glad Valmor is getting better
> >> results also.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > These 4k-sector drives can be
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:20:47PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
However, I'm now trying to get X up and running. "The X Server
Configuration HOWTO", section 3. "Configuring Xorg" says:
"Hal comes with many premade devi
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 00:20:47 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo!
>
> I've just got a sparkling new installation of Gentoo on my new PC. It
> only took me ~5 hours, mainly because I'd already configured the kernel
> in a trial run. :-)
>
> However, I'm now trying to get X up and running.
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> My solution to simplify Gentoo...
>
> waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
> sys-libs/pam
> sys-apps/dbus
> sys-apps/hal
That's as much crippling as simplifying. You can do without pam and hal
by setting appropriate USE flags
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:16:15AM -0600, Dale wrote:
> Simpler than that, just add -hal to xorg stuff in package.use and then
> run emerge -uvDNa world. It will rebuild a couple things, maybe even
> just xorg, then everything is back to the old way. This allows hal to
> be their for other thi
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:16:15AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Simpler than that, just add -hal to xorg stuff in package.use and then
run emerge -uvDNa world. It will rebuild a couple things, maybe even
just xorg, then everything is
Hi, Iain,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:09:14AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:20 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> [snip to the crux:]
> > Can this new-style fragmented XML configuration do anything that a
> > good old-fashioned, human-readable and compact xorg.conf can't? If
>
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:27:32 +0100, Neil Bothwick
wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
sys-libs/pam
sys-apps/dbus
sys-apps/hal
That's as much crippling as simplifying. You can do w
On 9 Feb 2010, at 00:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am
now
suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (including all parts
of my RAID5) are starting on sector 63 and I don'
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:43:12 +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote:
> > That's as much crippling as simplifying. You can do without pam and
> > hal by setting appropriate USE flags (I run pam-free here by
> > doing just that) but D-Bus provides a standard way for applications to
> > communicate with one anot
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:46:40 +, Stroller wrote:
> > With the RAID, you could fail one disk, repartition, re-add it,
> > rinse and
> > repeat. But that doesn't take care of the time issue.
>
> Aren't you thinking of LVM, or something?
No. The very nature of RAID is redundancy, so you could
On Dienstag 09 Februar 2010, Stroller wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2010, at 00:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> >> Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am
> >> now
> >> suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (including a
On Dienstag 09 Februar 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to unsubscribe from this list, but the
> mlmmj said, that I cannot unsubscribe since I am
> not subscribed. Which isn't quite right as you
> can see here.
> I fear if I would subscribe now a second time and
> unsubscr
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 13:46:40 Stroller wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2010, at 00:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> >> Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am
> >> now
> >> suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (inc
On 2/8/2010 5:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
. Am I the only person that finds this semantic gibberish? Is there
any explanation somewhere of what a "policy" aka "device rule" is? What
is the semantic significance of a "device rule"? What does it mean, to
"rule a device", or what sort of restr
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> Hi, Iain,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:09:14AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:20 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> > [snip to the crux:]
>> > > Can this new-style fragmented XML configuration do anything that a
>> > > good old-fashioned, human
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:43:12 +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote:
>
>> > That's as much crippling as simplifying. You can do without pam and
>> > hal by setting appropriate USE flags (I run pam-free here by
>> > doing just that) but D-Bus provides a st
On 2/9/2010 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
sys-libs/pam
sys-apps/dbus
sys-apps/hal
You'll have to do a manual depclean (very carefully) and
revdep-rebuild, but it's wor
On 9 Feb 2010, at 13:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
With Raid (NOT striping) you can remove one disk, leaving the Raid-
array in a
reduced state. Then repartition the disk you removed, repartition
and then re-
add the disk to the array.
Exactly. Except the partitions extend, in the same posit
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 16:11:14 Stroller wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2010, at 13:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > ...
> > With Raid (NOT striping) you can remove one disk, leaving the Raid-
> > array in a
> > reduced state. Then repartition the disk you removed, repartition
> > and then re-
> > add the disk
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:11:14 +, Stroller wrote:
> You cannot remove one disk from the array and repartition it, because
> the partition is across the array, not the disk. The single disk,
> removed from a RAID 5 (specified by Paul Hartman) array does not
> contain any partitions, just one
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> There's a few small downsides I've run into with all of this so far:
>
> 1) Since we don't use sector 63 it seems that fdisk will still tell
> you that you can use 63 until you use up all your primary partitions.
> It used to be easier to put
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage
is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
thanks
Laurent
Am Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> > 4) Everything I've done so far leave me with messages about partition
> > 1 not ending on a cylinder boundary. Googling on that one says don't
> > worry about it. I don't know...
Well since only the start of a partition determines its a
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:45:20 +0100, Laurent Kappler
wrote:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage
is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
thanks
Laurent
add this to your package.mask: ">=media-gfx/imagemagick-6.4.7.1" and then
emerge imagemagick again
On 9 Feb 2010, at 15:43, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:11:14 +, Stroller wrote:
You cannot remove one disk from the array and repartition it, because
the partition is across the array, not the disk. The single disk,
removed from a RAID 5 (specified by Paul Hartman) array does
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:45:20 +0100
Laurent Kappler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
> portage is 6.5.7.
>
> How could I do that??
>
> thanks
> Laurent
by using emerge "=ImageMagick-6.4.7.0" - if that version was in portage
though, which is not,
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:45:20 +0100, Laurent Kappler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
> portage is 6.5.7.
Go to http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/ browse to the
package you want and select Show dead files. this gives all the obsoleted
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am now
>> suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (including all parts
>> of my RAID5) are starting on sector
On 9 Feb 2010, at 15:27, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 16:11:14 Stroller wrote:
On 9 Feb 2010, at 13:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
With Raid (NOT striping) you can remove one disk, leaving the Raid-
array in a
reduced state. Then repartition the disk you removed, repartition
a
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Laurent Kappler
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage is
> 6.5.7.
>
> How could I do that??
Here you can download ebuilds for all previous versions and then put
it in your local overlay:
http://sources.gentoo.or
try emerge =media-gfx/imagemagick-6.4.7.0
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Laurent Kappler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage is
> 6.5.7.
>
> How could I do that??
>
> thanks
> Laurent
>
>
On 02/09/2010 06:45 PM, Laurent Kappler wrote:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage
is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
You can't, since the lowest version in portage is 6.5.2.9:
$ eix imagemagick
[I] media-gfx/imagemagick
Available versions: 6.5.2
Hi, Gentoo,
The Subject: just about says it all; following the instructions in "The
Xfce Configuration Guide", I did
# emerge -avt xfce4-meta
followed by
$ echo "exec startxfce4" > ~/.xinitrc
followed by
$ startx.
The X-server complained about not finding startxfce4. A quick fin
Laurent Kappler writes:
> I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
> portage is 6.5.7.
>
> How could I do that??
Look in the attic [*] for old ebuilds. Looks like 6.4.7.0 is not
available, so maybe you will download 6.4.8.3 which is the nearest
version. Put the ebuild
Hey guys,
There seems to be a lot of confusion over this RAID thing.
Hardware RAID does not use partitions. The entire drive is used (or,
actually, the amount defined in setting up the array) and all I/O is
handled by the BIOS on the RAID controller. The array appears as a
single drive to the OS
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Is this some sort of LVM thing creeping in? I don't use it but I see
> signs of it starting to show up on my systems like something is making
> it come in with new profiles or something.
Some lvm tools/packages have replaced others that don't h
Laurent Kappler schrieb:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage
is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
thanks
Laurent
Hi,
you will have to search for the source and an ebuild. I remember that
there is a place where all (old) ebuils are saved, but I cannot
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> So sdb7 now ends at sector 976703935. Interestingly, I couldn’t use the
> immediate next sector for sdb8:
> start for sdb8 response by fdisk
> 976703936 sector already allocated
> 976703944 Value out of range. First secto
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Stroller wrote:
> IMO this is a fdisk "bug". A feature should be added so that it tries to
> align optimally in most circumstances. RAID controllers should not be trying
> to do anything clever to accommodate potential misalignment unless it is
> really cheap to do
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo,
>
> The Subject: just about says it all; following the instructions in "The
> Xfce Configuration Guide", I did
>
> # emerge -avt xfce4-meta
>
> followed by
>
> $ echo "exec startxfce4" > ~/.xinitrc
>
> followed by
>
> $
Alex Schuster a écrit :
Laurent Kappler writes:
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
portage is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
Look in the attic [*] for old ebuilds. Looks like 6.4.7.0 is not
available, so maybe you will download 6.4.8.3 which is the neare
On 02/08/2010 10:27 PM, Konstantinos Bekiaris wrote:
What do you have in /etc/env.d/gcc/? I have this:
#ls -l /etc/env.d/gcc/
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32 2010-02-08 11:53 config-i686-pc-linux-gnu
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235 2009-01-29 12:33 i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.2
firefly ~ # emerge -ep xfce4-meta | grep xfce | grep utils
[ebuild R ] xfce-base/xfce-utils-4.6.1
firefly ~ #
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> firefly ~ # which startxfce4
> /usr/bin/startxfce4
> firefly ~ # equery belongs /usr/bin/startxfce4
> [ Searching for file(s) /
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 19:25:00 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Stroller
> wrote:
>
> > IMO this is a fdisk "bug". A feature should be added so that it tries to
> > align optimally in most circumstances. RAID controllers should not be
> > trying to do anything clever t
Wow, seven mostly similar answers. Is the list becoming slow? When I
posted about an hour after the question was posted, there were no answers
yet. Let's see how long this post takes to arrive. Usually it's just a
matter of a few minutes.
Wonko
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 19:03:39 Neil Walker wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> There seems to be a lot of confusion over this RAID thing.
>
> Hardware RAID does not use partitions. The entire drive is used (or,
> actually, the amount defined in setting up the array) and all I/O is
> handled by the BIOS
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> Hi, Gentoo,
>>
>> The Subject: just about says it all; following the instructions in "The
>> Xfce Configuration Guide", I did
>>
>># emerge -avt xfce4-meta
>>
>> followed by
>>
>>$ echo "exec startxfce4" > ~/.xi
Alex Schuster a écrit :
Laurent Kappler writes:
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
portage is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
Look in the attic [*] for old ebuilds. Looks like 6.4.7.0 is not
available, so maybe you will download 6.4.8.3 which is the neare
On 02/09/2010 09:32 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
Wow, seven mostly similar answers. Is the list becoming slow? When I
posted about an hour after the question was posted, there were no answers
yet. Let's see how long this post takes to arrive. Usually it's just a
matter of a few minutes.
I noticed t
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:17:48 +, Stroller wrote:
> only applies in the specific case that Paul Hartman is using Linux
> software RAID, not the general case of RAID in general.
That's true, although in the Linux world I expect that the number of
software RAID users far outnumbers the hardware
Mark Knecht writes:
> Possibly you installed something other than xfce4-meta?
>
> firefly ~ # emerge -ep xfce4-meta | grep xfce | grep utils
> [ebuild R ] xfce-base/xfce-utils-4.6.1
> firefly ~ #
I'm just seconding fireflys' report. I suspect xfce4 expects you to
be starting X from a system
Am Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> I have reset sdb7 to use boundaries divisible by 64.
> Old rangebegin%64 size%64 New rangebegin%64
> size%64 813113973-976703804 0.82810.125813113984-976703935 0
>0
>
> And guess what - the spe
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 22:13:39 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> When I use parted on the drives, it says (both the old external and my 2
> months old internal):
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> So no speedup for me then. :-/
>
That doesn't mean a thing, I'm afraid.
I have the 4KB d
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
>
>> I have reset sdb7 to use boundaries divisible by 64.
>> Old range begin%64 size%64 New range begin%64
>> size%64 813113973-976703804 0.8281 0.125
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 2/9/2010 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
sys-libs/pam
sys-apps/dbus
sys-apps/hal
You'll have to do
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:39:45PM +0100, Laurent Kappler wrote:
> I'm using Haxe/Neko and we have a wrapper for ImageMagick, but as no one
> did really use it often the last version is made for IM 6.4.7.
> So I might download the ebuild 6.4.5 in a hurry, then we will update the
> Haxe library.
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Mark Knecht writes:
>
>> Possibly you installed something other than xfce4-meta?
>>
>> firefly ~ # emerge -ep xfce4-meta | grep xfce | grep utils
>> [ebuild R ] xfce-base/xfce-utils-4.6.1
>> firefly ~ #
>
> I'm just seconding fireflys' report. I suspect xfce4 expects y
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 08:47 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I now only need to figure out the best way to configure LVM over this to get
> the best performance from it. Does anyone know of a decent way of figuring
> this out?
> I got 6 disks in Raid-5.
why LVM? Planning on changing partition size
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 13:34 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:46:40 +, Stroller wrote:
>
> > > With the RAID, you could fail one disk, repartition, re-add it,
> > > rinse and
> > > repeat. But that doesn't take care of the time issue.
> >
> > Aren't you thinking of LVM,
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 20:37 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Don't get me started on those ;)
> The reason I use Linux Software Raid is because:
> 1) I can't afford hardware raid adapters
> 2) It's generally faster then hardware fakeraid
I'm starting to stray OT here, but I'm considering a second-han
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 18:03:39 Neil Walker wrote:
> Be lucky,
>
> Neil
How would I go about doing that?
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:54 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > When I use parted on the drives, it says (both the old external and my 2
> > months old internal):
> > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> > So no speedup for me then. :-
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 22:58:10 Dale wrote:
> So, hal may be progress to you but it is a step backward for me.
> It's the opposite of progress.
Careful now, Dale. Watch that blood pressure...
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:58:10 +0100, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 2/9/2010 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
sys-lib
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 22:58:10 Dale wrote:
So, hal may be progress to you but it is a step backward for me.
It's the opposite of progress.
Careful now, Dale. Watch that blood pressure...
Oh I'm fine. I a
On 9 Feb 2010, at 23:52, Iain Buchanan wrote:
...
I'm starting to stray OT here, but I'm considering a second-hand
Adaptec
2420SA - this is real hardware raid right?
Looks like it. Looks pretty nice, too.
The affordable PCI / PCI-X 3wares don't do RAID6 - you have to go PCIe
for that, I
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:02:50 Dale wrote:
> Oh I'm fine.
Thank Goodness!
> Now to go watch NCIS.
I won't ask what that is; I think I'd rather not know.
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:54 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>
>
>> > When I use parted on the drives, it says (both the old external and my 2
>> > months old internal):
>> > Sector size (
On 9 Feb 2010, at 19:37, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
Don't get me started on those ;)
The reason I use Linux Software Raid is because:
1) I can't afford hardware raid adapters
2) It's generally faster then hardware fakeraid
I'd rather have slow hardware RAID than fast software RAID. I'm not
bein
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:58:10 +0100, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 2/9/2010 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplif
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:18:54 +0100, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:02:50 Dale wrote:
Oh I'm fine.
Thank Goodness!
Now to go watch NCIS.
I won't ask what that is; I think I'd rather not know.
NCIS = Naval Criminal Investigative Service. It's good ;)
I am w
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:18:54 +0100, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:02:50 Dale wrote:
Oh I'm fine.
Thank Goodness!
Now to go watch NCIS.
I won't ask what that is; I think I'd rather not know.
On 02/09/2010 06:30 PM, Dale wrote:
With all the things I have to deal with, hal is not even on the top 25 or so.
> Heck, my puter doesn't even make that.
You offer us a glimmer of hope, Dale. How did you push your computer problems
below number 25? If it involves drugs, please publish a lis
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 13:34 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:46:40 +, Stroller wrote:
> > > > With the RAID, you could fail one disk, repartition, re-add it,
> > > > rinse and
> > > > repeat. But that doesn't take care of
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2010 18:03:39 Neil Walker wrote:
>
>
>> Be lucky,
>>
>> Neil
>>
>
> How would I go about doing that?
>
Well, you need a rabbit's foot, a four leaf clover, a horseshoe
(remember to keep the open end uppermost), a black cat,
;)
Be
Iain Buchanan wrote:
> I'm starting to stray OT here, but I'm considering a second-hand Adaptec
> 2420SA - this is real hardware raid right?
>
It's a PCI-X card (not PCI-E). Are you sure that's right for your system?
> If I'm buying drives in the 1Tb size - does this 4k issue affect
> hardware
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 17:27 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:54 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> Frank,
> >>As best I can tell so far none of the Linux tools will tell you
> >> that the sectors are 4K. I had to go to t
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:22:31 Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 08:47 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I now only need to figure out the best way to configure LVM over this to
> > get the best performance from it. Does anyone know of a decent way of
> > figuring this out?
> > I go
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 07:31 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > so long as you didn't have any non-detectable disk errors before
> > removing the disk, or any drive failure while one of the drives were
> > removed. And the deterioration in pe
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 03:29:50 Dale wrote:
> Well, actually, if hal would have worked I wouldn't have cared if it
> uses xorg.conf at all. That was the point of using hal. Thing is, I
> followed the howto and it didn't work. The fact that the config files
> are in xml only became a pr
82 matches
Mail list logo
