Hi group
I have set up my firefox item in k-menu to be launched via Win+Z. A short
while ago, mozilla-firefox-bin was renamed to only firefox-bin. At first, the
shortcut wasn’t visible anymore until I changed its command manually to
firefox-bin¹. But since then also, the shortcut doesn’t work a
Am Sonntag, 17. Januar 2010 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> Hi group
>
> I have set up my firefox item in k-menu to be launched via Win+Z. A short
> while ago, mozilla-firefox-bin was renamed to only firefox-bin. At first,
> the shortcut wasn’t visible anymore until I changed its command manually to
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 01/17/2010 07:31 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> my system is gentoo amd64, with kde 4.3, smplayer is 0.6.8. i setup my
>> whole as root, and the system works fine. but if i log in as a normal
>> user, the smplayer does not have som
On 01/17/2010 11:42 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 01/17/2010 07:31 AM, Xi Shen wrote:
hi,
my system is gentoo amd64, with kde 4.3, smplayer is 0.6.8. i setup my
whole as root, and the system works fine. but if i log in as a normal
user, the s
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:40:44 +0100, YoYo siska wrote:
> . If you are doing it this way (on a running system with mounted
> dev/proc/sys...), you can just bind-mount your current / to another
> directory. That "copy" will not contain any "sub-mounts" (as if you
> accessed it from a livecd),
Or you
On Saturday 16 January 2010 22:14:00 walt wrote:
> On 01/16/2010 08:32 AM, Mikie wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am converting an Ubuntu 9.10 to NFS boot by coping files to the NFS
> > root.
> >
> > My question is:
> >
> > Would it be better to create a local hard drive swap and file system for
> > cer
On Saturday 16 January 2010 20:28:53 Jarry wrote:
> >> Now I installed one more sata-disk, attached to "sata4"
> >> position on mobo. But this changed the way how other
> >> disks are detected:
> >>
> >> Mobo: drive: system:
> >> sata1 160GB /dev/sdb
> >> sata2 160GB /dev/sdc
> >> sata3 dvdrw (not_
Am Sonntag, 17. Januar 2010 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
> >>> my system is gentoo amd64, with kde 4.3, smplayer is 0.6.8. i setup my
> >>> whole as root, and the system works fine. but if i log in as a normal
> >>> user, the smplayer does not have some. i have already add that user
> >>> account in
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 08:48:21AM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 01/17/2010 12:40 AM, YoYo siska wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 03:21:32PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2010 07:33 PM, Jarry wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I'll just copy the instructions I have someone else here:
>>>
On 17. 1. 2010 11:30, Alan McKinnon wrote:
In between I got a reply from other mailing list saying
"it is not a bug, it is a feature!". And the reason for
this feature is udev - it creates dev-files dynamically
and sata port-numbers do not play any role for order
in which hard-drives are detecte
Am Sonntag 17 Januar 2010 11:30:00 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> On Saturday 16 January 2010 20:28:53 Jarry wrote:
> > >> Now I installed one more sata-disk, attached to "sata4"
> > >> position on mobo. But this changed the way how other
> > >> disks are detected:
> > >>
> > >> Mobo: drive: system:
> >
On Sunday 17 January 2010 15:14:06 Jarry wrote:
> > If all you are doing is making filesystems available for use, and you
> > find you are getting involved with device names, then you are doing
> > something contrary to current kernel/udev/userspace practice.
>
> If your last paragraph ist true, t
As our resident hal-hater-in-charge, Dale will no doubt be *very* pleased to
hear of what Ubuntu is doing for 10.04:
entirely removing hal in favour of DeviceKit.
When I say *entirely*, that's what the blog said - entirely. If this pans out,
maybe there's a chance Dale can get a working (recent
Alan McKinnon wrote:
As our resident hal-hater-in-charge, Dale will no doubt be *very* pleased to
hear of what Ubuntu is doing for 10.04:
entirely removing hal in favour of DeviceKit.
When I say *entirely*, that's what the blog said - entirely. If this pans out,
maybe there's a chance Dale ca
Had you ever thought of asking this on an Ubuntu list rather than a
Gentoo one?
[K. Mike Bradley]
Sorry Ubuntu server Gentoo client
My question is what parts if the FSH should be local on the Gentoo
client.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:39:27AM -0600, Dale wrote:
> From my understanding, isn't the same guy doing devicekit that did
> hal? I'm not saying it won't be better because it should be. From what
> I read a good while back, he learned a lot about the pitfalls of hal.
> He, most likely, will
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 17:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> As our resident hal-hater-in-charge, Dale will no doubt be *very* pleased to
> hear of what Ubuntu is doing for 10.04:
>
> entirely removing hal in favour of DeviceKit.
>
> When I say *entirely*, that's what the blog said - entirely. If t
pk writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> So, where would I make such a setting in the new arrangement?... I
>> suspect I could force a return to xorg.conf... but would sooner
>> understand how to utilize the new proceedure.
>
> xorg.conf still works fine with the latest incarnations of Xorg. If you
On Sunday 17 January 2010 18:18:36 Eray Aslan wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:39:27AM -0600, Dale wrote:
> > From my understanding, isn't the same guy doing devicekit that did
> > hal? I'm not saying it won't be better because it should be. From what
> > I read a good while back, he learned
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> As our resident hal-hater-in-charge, Dale will no doubt be *very* pleased to
> hear of what Ubuntu is doing for 10.04:
>
> entirely removing hal in favour of DeviceKit.
It seems that DeviceKit is no help for the various bugs in hald that
prevent writng CDs/DVDs/BluRays un
Eray Aslan wrote:
> It is usually done right in the third version. First one too small,
> second one too big, third one just right :)
>
> I think it is called "Second System Effect"
>
No, it's called "Goldilocks and the Three Bears". ;)
Be lucky,
Neil
http://www.neiljw.com
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> entirely removing hal in favour of DeviceKit.
Xorg is removing HAL support; as of xorg-server-1.8 HAL is no longer
used. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Nzc2Mw
Devicekit will not replace HAL entirely:
http://www.x.org/wiki/XorgHAL
Btw, devicekit has bee
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> how do we
> prevent that DeviceKit will become the same desaster as hald?
>
The only way to be sure of that is to write your own replacement for HAL. ;)
Be lucky,
Neil
http://www.neiljw.com
On Friday 15 January 2010 15:25:09 James wrote:
> Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:38:27 + (UTC), James wrote:
> Ok, I do not know what it is called.
It's called the kdm login manager (it is a Display Manager).
> I'm running kde-meta 4.3.3
> It's the kde scre
Harry Putnam wrote:
> For now, with hal, with dbus, assuming no xorg.conf... where are
> custom settings regarding the X session done?
Under /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/... or you could continue to use the old
xorg.conf since that will override what's in ...xorg.conf.d/
Best regards
Peter K
Hi,
My 5-year old gentoo-AMD64 machine when up in smoke this week so I'm
building a new machine. Most parts are on order but one big change
these days is the motherboards I want to purchase no longer support
EIDE/ATAPI interfaces so I'll have to get a new CD-R/DVD-R drive to
get the OS loaded and
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:09:44 +0200, Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
gate etc # ls -la /etc/make.profile
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 54 Jan 16 12:08 /etc/make.profile ->
../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop
gate etc # emerge eselect
--- Invalid atom in /usr/portag
=== On Sun, 01/17, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
> Or you could simply use the -x option with rsync. But copying an in
> use filesystem is a bad idea, better to boot from a live CD and do
> the job there. If you want to minimise downtime,
===
I recently did something like this. I did use the 10th anni
On 17 Jan 2010, at 18:42, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
As our resident hal-hater-in-charge, Dale will no doubt be *very*
pleased to
hear of what Ubuntu is doing for 10.04:
entirely removing hal in favour of DeviceKit.
It seems that DeviceKit is no help for the various bugs
Stroller wrote:
> > It seems that DeviceKit is no help for the various bugs in hald that
> > prevent writng CDs/DVDs/BluRays under certain circumstances.
> >
> > I did write mail to the DeviceKit maintainer to no avail, ...
>
> You probably didn't bitch him out thoroughly enough, Joerg.
I did se
hi!
I'm running Gentoo inside VirtualBox (on a Windows host, if that matters)
and I can't make X.org work. when I try "X -configure" it says it can't load
the vboxvideo library. according to some Google searches, that library
really doesn't work with the newest X.org. if that's really true, is the
pk wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
entirely removing hal in favour of DeviceKit.
Xorg is removing HAL support; as of xorg-server-1.8 HAL is no longer
used. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Nzc2Mw
Devicekit will not replace HAL entirely:
http://www.x.org/wiki/XorgHAL
Bt
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Neil Walker wrote:
> Mikie wrote:
>> I am converting an Ubuntu 9.10 to NFS boot by coping files to the NFS
>> root.
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>> Would it be better to create a local hard drive swap and file system for
>> certain root dir?
>>
>> Should Tmp be local
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:16:33 +0200, Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
> emerge --info:
>
> Output can be found here:
> http://dpaste.com/146596/
Please don't put important information on temporary sites, it makes
reading the thread in the archives at a later date useless.
> gate ~ # emerge --info
> --- In
I've hit a bug that won't let me start an xfce4 session. I think it
was caused by upgrading glibc, and it is pretty well described in this
nearly 4-year-old bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/125909
The solution is presented as:
qlist -o $(qlist -ICv) | scanelf -Bs__guard -qf - -F%F#s | xargs qfile
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Crístian Viana
wrote:
> hi!
> I'm running Gentoo inside VirtualBox (on a Windows host, if that matters)
> and I can't make X.org work. when I try "X -configure" it says it can't load
> the vboxvideo library. according to some Google searches, that library
> really
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 16:39 -0500, AJ Spagnoletti wrote:
> > with 2.6.31 everything works fine (network manager, wpa supplicant,
> > etc). However with 2.6.32, I can load the module (iwlagn) and see it in
> > dmesg, but iwconfig just says "wlan0 no wireless extensions." and I
> > can't associate
On Monday 18 January 2010 05:59:14 Grant wrote:
> I've hit a bug that won't let me start an xfce4 session. I think it
> was caused by upgrading glibc, and it is pretty well described in this
> nearly 4-year-old bug:
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/125909
>
> The solution is presented as:
>
> qlist -
On Sunday 17 January 2010 22:14:06 Neil Walker wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > how do we
> > prevent that DeviceKit will become the same desaster as hald?
>
> The only way to be sure of that is to write your own replacement for HAL.
> ;)
That might not be a bad idea
I never agreed with
39 matches
Mail list logo
