Hi list!
I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem
that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I
start a second app (for example playing a video with Kaffeine while
Amarok runs but is idle) the second application reports that the device
"does not
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
>> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
>> >> for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
>> >> It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 20:06 -0800, BRM wrote:
[... way too much background info removed]
BREVITY! We don't want to have to read about what you had on your
sandwich for lunch or the fight you had with your girl to get to the
meat of what you're trying to say ;-).
Since you didn't paste the link t
On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:59:38 Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote:
> >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
> >> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
> >> >> for I have to manually rem
On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:58:42 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem
> that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I
> start a second app (for example playing a video with Kaffeine while
> Amarok ru
On Saturday 28 November 2009 06:06:59 BRM wrote:
> So, I have been running my laptop for quite a while with the current
> software - it's been well over a week since I last synced and installed
> software - when I upgraded to KDE4; and I do believe I've rebooted several
> times since.
>
> Today
On Saturday 28 November 2009 05:50:42 »Q« wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:57:54 +0200
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> [about LastPass]
>
> > What I find incredible is that people will accept the site's say-so
> > that the site admins can't read the data. They have not proven
> > anything, merely asse
On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote:
> > To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct
> > portage tool:
> >
> > a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate
> > * Searching for kate ...
> > kde-base/kdesdk-meta-4.3.1 (>=kde-base/kate-4.3.1:4.3[kdeprefix=])
> > kd
28.11.2009 04:50, »Q«:
> They claim that the decrypted data never leaves your computer and they
> they don't have a key to it. Many, many things aren't clear, such as
> what kind of encryption is used (same as the US gov't uses for "Top
> Secret" stuff, they say, heh),
That reminds me of the fa
- Original Message
From: Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 06:06:59 BRM wrote:
> > During boot, udevd (version 146, btw) complains about "error getting
> > signalfd". I did some basic hunting and this seems to have been a big
> > problem over the last year. I'm running kernel
On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:04:10 BRM wrote:
> > You also mention /dev/hda and the context implies it is a physical disk.
> > Unless you have ancient disk hardware and unusual module setup, your
> > disks will be /dev/sda. Do you have references to /dev/dh** in
> > /etc/fstab? That won;t work
- Original Message
From: Alan McKinnon
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:04:10 BRM wrote:
> > > You also mention /dev/hda and the context implies it is a physical disk.
> > > Unless you have ancient disk hardware and unusual module setup, your
> > > disks will be /dev/sda. Do you have
Subject pretty much says it all. I'm just wondering where it went...
I've tried searching on b.g.o. and google but to no avail (my
"google-fu" may be limited). Does any one know?
Best regards
Peter K
Hello John & Walt,
Thanks for the responses. Here is the information you asked for.
John Lowry writes:
> What is the contents of your /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# PCI device 0x10b7:0x9200 (3c59x)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:01:03:c5:2a:7b",
NAME="eth0"
On Saturday 28 November 2009 18:31:04 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> From: Alan McKinnon
>
> > On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:04:10 BRM wrote:
> > > > You also mention /dev/hda and the context implies it is a physical
> > > > disk. Unless you have ancient disk hardware and unusual
Roger Mason wrote:
Hello John & Walt,
Thanks for the responses. Here is the information you asked for.
John Lowry writes:
What is the contents of your /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# PCI device 0x10b7:0x9200 (3c59x)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:01:03:c5:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:59:38 Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
>> >> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
>> >>
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:58:42 Florian Philipp wrote:
>> Hi list!
>>
>> I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem
>> that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I
>> start a second app (for example playing a video wi
On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:22:14 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote:
> > > To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct
> > > portage tool:
> > >
> > > a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate
> > > * Searching for kate ...
> > > k
On Saturday 28 November 2009 21:32:28 Mick wrote:
> > I suppose one could make several useful -meta packages DEPEND on kate, as
> > many users want kate and do not want the entire kdesdk package. But that
> > causes the same app to appear in more than one -meta package and the
> > devs seem to wa
Florian Philipp napsal(a):
> I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem
> that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I
> start a second app (for example playing a video with Kaffeine while
> Amarok runs but is idle) the second application reports t
Hi,
Subject says it all: I'd like to install a certain package
but without its dependencies. No matter what ebuild says,
I want to install just this package and nothing more.
And I'd like to have this package excluded from all future
dependency-checks (like revdep-rebuild). How could I do it?
J
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 November 2009 19:20:43 Chuck Robey wrote:
>> I need to get an up-to-date version of eclipse working on my gentoo
>> box. First question is, is there a Galileo (3.5+) version of eclipse
>> available as a portage package? I can't find it, so I'd really appre
I keep having a problem where the OS becomes inaccessable after
running in X for a while. I haven't noticed a time pattern yet but it
doesn't take long sometimes.
Today I started from an OFF machine, booted up, started X did a few
things A few minutes later I attempted to login via ssh from a re
On Saturday 28 November 2009 22:16:17 Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Subject says it all: I'd like to install a certain package
> but without its dependencies. No matter what ebuild says,
> I want to install just this package and nothing more.
Did you even try to read the emerge man page?
Obviously not,
On Saturday 28 November 2009 22:18:06 Chuck Robey wrote:
> Alan McKinnon's response, below, seems to be telling me that I really
> should go ahead and try to use the binary from the eclipse site, and not
> to worry about getting into dependency problems with portage. Normally,
> most package to
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:06:59 -0800 (PST)
BRM wrote:
...[snip]...
> Either way, I need to figure out how to get read-access to the root
> partition again. Any advice on either of the above (or other
> options), and more importantly (since any options depend on it) how
> to get read-write access to
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 05:50:42 »Q« wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:57:54 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
[about LastPass]
What I find incredible is that people will accept the site's say-so
that the site admins can'
Hello John,
John Lowry writes:
> If you have only the two cards installed you can delete
> everything except for the first entry and the one referencing the card
> currently in the machine and change name to "eth1." So:
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:01:03:c5:2a:7b",
> N
Miroslav Flídr schrieb:
> Florian Philipp napsal(a):
>> I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem
>> that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I
>> start a second app (for example playing a video with Kaffeine while
>> Amarok runs but is idle) th
On Saturday 28 November 2009 19:42:33 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 21:32:28 Mick wrote:
> > > I suppose one could make several useful -meta packages DEPEND on kate,
> > > as many users want kate and do not want the entire kdesdk package. But
> > > that causes the same app to
On 11/28/2009 5:03 PM, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 05:50:42 »Q« wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:57:54 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
[about LastPass]
What I find incredible is that people will accept the site'
- Original Message
From: Alan McKinnon
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 18:31:04 BRM wrote:
> > I do have sources for linux kernel 2.6.30-gentoo-r8 available, but then I
> > need to be able to write to the read-only fs. Guess I could probably do
> > that using the kernel command-line, n
Hi group,
When my netbook boots under battery power w/o the ac adapter connected
I get this warning msg in the boot window: 'Skipping fsck due to not
being an ac adapter'. Chaos ensues. The warning appears in
/etc/init.d/fsck.
How do I fix this? Some option in /etc/conf.d/fsck?
If you look for
On 28 Nov 2009, at 22:03, Dale wrote:
...
And to think I came here to ask others opinion BEFORE doing this. I
was curious as to how this could work myself and if they can be
trusted, or SHOULD be trusted. Seems everyone thinks no one should.
Everyone's yakking it up because it makes the
On 11/28/2009 3:18 PM, Chuck Robey wrote:
Several comments about answers here. First, to Marcus Wanner, yes, the
first
two eclipse packages work for 3.5, but they AREN'T eclipse, they are plugins for
eclipse (plugins for what I really want). The 3rd is eclipse-sdk, the only one
you don't cover
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 28 Nov 2009, at 22:03, Dale wrote:
...
And to think I came here to ask others opinion BEFORE doing this. I
was curious as to how this could work myself and if they can be
trusted, or SHOULD be trusted. Seems everyone thin
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:49:29 +
Stroller wrote:
> Everyone's yakking it up because it makes them look clever.
Either that, or they're 'yakking it up' in hopes of discouraging a
regular user here from taking an amazing risk with his banking access
passwords.
> The "Why LastPass is safe" page
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 20:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
...
> Another situation I was thinking about. Let's say it is as secure as
> they CLAIM it to be. If someone stole my puter, I could go to lostpass
> and change the master password or just close the account. Then even my
> computer would be usele
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:44:48 -0600
Dale wrote:
> So, another question. Is there a tool that is local and would do
> something like this? I am using Seamonkey 2.0 nowadays. It seems to
> have some tools available to it that the old Seamonkey doesn't.
I don't know of a tool with browser integ
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:49:29 +
Stroller wrote:
Everyone's yakking it up because it makes them look clever.
Either that, or they're 'yakking it up' in hopes of discouraging a
regular user here from taking an amazi
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 20:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
...
Another situation I was thinking about. Let's say it is as secure as
they CLAIM it to be. If someone stole my puter, I could go to lostpass
and change the master password o
42 matches
Mail list logo
