Hi,
I'm trying to install lm_sensors using gentoo-wiki, but I came
accros some dependency problem:
# emerge --pretend lm_sensors
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N] sys-fs/sysfsutils-2.1.0
[ebuild
Hi,
with guvcview I capture video streams of some birds, which
sometime arrive on the roof.
When they do I press the record button of the guvcview application.
The webcam I use is able to deliver 30fps at 640x320 pixel with audio
via usb.
Unfortunately while recording nothing else should use th
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 09:42 +0200, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install lm_sensors using gentoo-wiki, but I came
> accros some dependency problem:
>
>
> # emerge --pretend lm_sensors
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> Calculating depend
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 09:42 +0200, Jarry wrote:
# emerge --pretend lm_sensors
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N] sys-fs/sysfsutils-2.1.0
[ebuild N] x11-misc/read-edid-1.
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 14:45 +0200, Jarry wrote:
[...]
> man sensord:
>
> DESCRIPTION
> Sensord is a daemon that can be used to periodically log
> sensor readings from hardware health-monitoring chips to
> syslog(3) ***OR*** a round-robin database (RRD) and to alert
> when a sensor alarm is signall
On 23 Aug 2009, at 14:02, Albert Hopkins wrote:
...
So if you believe there is a bug with the ebuild, you can submit a bug
report to bugs.gentoo.org. As always, patches are welcomed.
I assume that the RDEPEND was added because decode-edid.pl was
supplied by upstream (at least this is how I
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:20:08 +0200
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Is there any chance to start guvcview with user rights AND to give the
> application higer priorities so that whatever guvcview wants from the
> system will be served as soon as possible to avoid stuttering videos?
You can create a s
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:11:10 +0200
Florian Philipp wrote:
> I'm wondering what you think about CFLAGS="-fstack-protector"? Do you
> use it on security critical systems? Do you compile your kernel with it
> (2.6.30+)? Is the performance decrease noticeable?
I might be missing a point, but if you
Mike Kazantsev [09-08-23 16:08]:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:20:08 +0200
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > Is there any chance to start guvcview with user rights AND to give the
> > application higer priorities so that whatever guvcview wants from the
> > system will be served as soon as possible t
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 15:05 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> On 23 Aug 2009, at 14:02, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> > ...
> > So if you believe there is a bug with the ebuild, you can submit a bug
> > report to bugs.gentoo.org. As always, patches are welcomed.
>
> I assume that the RDEPEND was added because d
On 23 Aug 2009, at 15:19, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
...
#!/bin/sh
exec nice -n -10 ionice -c 1 capture-command
...
This will give the whole 'capture-comand# the rights of root, which
I want to prevent (see my posting). Instead I want to give it only
higher priorities for I/O-usage and CPU-us
On 8/23/2009 8:45 AM, Jarry wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 09:42 +0200, Jarry wrote:
# emerge --pretend lm_sensors
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] sys-fs/sysfsutils-2.1.0
[ebui
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:19:14 +0200
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> This will give the whole 'capture-comand# the rights of root, which
> I want to prevent (see my posting). Instead I want to give it only
> higher priorities for I/O-usage and CPU-usage. It should still act
> with user rights for all o
Mike Kazantsev [09-08-23 17:08]:
> #!/bin/sh
> exec nice -n -10 ionice -c 1 sudo -u user capture-command
>
> (with the same initial sudo-invocation)
>
> --
> Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
...starts the capture command with user-rights, nice and ionice
fail cause starte with user rights,
Mike Kazantsev schrieb:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:11:10 +0200
> Florian Philipp wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering what you think about CFLAGS="-fstack-protector"? Do you
>> use it on security critical systems? Do you compile your kernel with it
>> (2.6.30+)? Is the performance decrease noticeable?
>
> I
At Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:12:53 -0400 7v5w7go9ub0o <7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> I have received a "flip video, ultra series (records 60 minutes)"
>> digital camcorder for a present.
>>
>> This works fine on windows, but I would naturally much prefer to use
>> gentoo.
Hello,
I have noticed this strange behavior on my gentoo box. After logging
out of gnome, gdm and the subsequent gnome session use vt8 instead of
vt7(which was used till that time). All following sessions continue
using vt8.
Has anybody else noticed such behavior?
Regards
Yiannis
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 05:32 +0300, Yiannis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have noticed this strange behavior on my gentoo box. After logging
> out of gnome, gdm and the subsequent gnome session use vt8 instead of
> vt7(which was used till that time). All following sessions continue
> using vt8.
> Has anybo
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:35:49 -0500
Lance Lassetter wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 05:32 +0300, Yiannis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have noticed this strange behavior on my gentoo box. After logging
> > out of gnome, gdm and the subsequent gnome session use vt8 instead
> > of vt7(which was used t
Hi.
Can hal mount .iso 9660 by loop device? I can mount .iso manually but I
want to do it automatically by hal.
--
vasya
Yiannis wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:35:49 -0500
> Lance Lassetter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 05:32 +0300, Yiannis wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have noticed this strange behavior on my gentoo box. After logging
> > > out of gnome, gdm and the subsequent gnome session use vt8 in
On Mon, August 24, 2009 08:03, Top Point wrote:
> Hi.
> Can hal mount .iso 9660 by loop device? I can mount .iso manually but I
> want to do it automatically by hal.
I don't quite get it. What would be the "trigger" to mount it?
Hal doesn't really mount anything, anyway. It's just a supposedly
si
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Mon, August 24, 2009 08:03, Top Point wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>> Can hal mount .iso 9660 by loop device? I can mount .iso manually but I
>> want to do it automatically by hal.
>>
>
> I don't quite get it. What would be the "trigger" to mount it?
> Hal doesn't really mount
On Mon, August 24, 2009 08:40, Dale wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> On Mon, August 24, 2009 08:03, Top Point wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi.
>>> Can hal mount .iso 9660 by loop device? I can mount .iso manually but
>>> I
>>> want to do it automatically by hal.
>>>
>>
>> I don't quite get it. What would b
24 matches
Mail list logo
