Hi Mike,
Thank you very much for your help, it is really detailed :)
More than I expect :)
I already read some (short) documents about GEM and now I have a tiny
picture about it.
Following your way I try to rebuild my X. I missed the x11 overlay
eredeti üzenet-
Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
performed "emerge system" ?
What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
--
~adj~
I've upgraded to vmware server v2 and it seems to be working, ie i cant start
my suspended guest OSes, but from the web GUI i cant get the console to popup
after loading the firefox plugin. When i click the area that says "click
anywhere to open the console" nothing happens.
I've not used v2 be
I've upgraded to vmware server v2 and it seems to be working, ie i cant start
my suspended guest OSes, but from the web GUI i cant get the console to popup
after loading the firefox plugin. When i click the area that says "click
anywhere to open the console" nothing happens.
I've not used v2 b
eredeti üzenet-
Feladó: "Thomas Kahle" tom...@gmx.de
Címzett: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, linux-think...@linux-thinkpad.org
Dátum: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:32:32 +0200
-
> Hi everyone,
>
> I use the thinkpad X61s
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
> I've upgraded to vmware server v2 and it seems to be working, ie i cant
> start my suspended guest OSes, but from the web GUI i cant get the console
> to popup after loading the firefox plugin. When i click the area that says
> "click anywhere
Hi everyone,
I use the thinkpad X61s with Intel Graphics Mobile GM965/GL960 running
Gentoo.
Since an update on Monday I cannot get my X to work the smooth way it
was working before.
1) The 2D performance feels very slack, Redrawing Windows just takes
longer than it took before and reaction times
2009/4/3 Adam Carter
>
>
> I've upgraded to vmware server v2 and it seems to be working, ie i cant
>> start my suspended guest OSes, but from the web GUI i cant get the console
>> to popup after loading the firefox plugin. When i click the area that says
>> "click anywhere to open the console"
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
> performed "emerge system" ?
> What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
>
> --
> ~adj~
>
Yes, I did it at the beginning of the year, it was more or less
painfree.
Pongrácz István wrote:
eredeti üzenet-
Feladó: "Thomas Kahle" tom...@gmx.de
Címzett: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, linux-think...@linux-thinkpad.org
Dátum: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:32:32 +0200
-
Hi everyone,
I us
>
> Well 2.5.3 is not in the tree anymore and 2.5.1 results in X crashing on
Sorry, I made a mistake: I wanted to write 2.5.1-r1..
> start with garbled screen. But I will avoid the upgrade after checking
> that bug :) Thanks for warning
You are welcome. I got a hint and I successfully remov
alain.didierj...@free.fr writes:
> Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
> performed "emerge system" ?
I did upgrade to 4.3 gcc series from 4.1. There was no compile error's
(I'm using ~x86 branch). Both emerge -e system and emerge -e world done
using new gcc.
> W
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I use the thinkpad X61s with Intel Graphics Mobile GM965/GL960 running
> Gentoo.
>
> Since an update on Monday I cannot get my X to work the smooth way it
> was working before.
>
> 1) The 2D performance feels very slack, Redrawing Windows just takes
> longe
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I use the thinkpad X61s with Intel Graphics Mobile GM965/GL960 running
> Gentoo.
>
> Since an update on Monday I cannot get my X to work the smooth way it
> was working before.
>
> 1) The 2D performance feels very slack, Redrawing Windows just takes
> longe
Selon alain.didierj...@free.fr:
> Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
> performed "emerge system" ?
> What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
Thanks for the fast answers. It seems there's no problems...
--
~adj~
> I used eeXbuntu to install mine.
>
>
Hi Neil,
OK, I'll try it. First some questions?
Is eeeXbuntu an install/live distro?
Was there any wifi issues? Must have wifi throughout the process.
Do you use an SD card? If so, are there issues with regard to r/w times as
compared to an SSHD?
Ho
090402 Joseph wrote:
> Can anybody provide configuration for Lynx to accept cookies.
> I only want to accept the cookies on case-by-case bases
> and store the default setting, same as Firefox behaviour.
You should ask this on the lynx-dev mailing-list,
where you are likely to get a very prompt rep
Greets,
So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that I
had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things like the
danger of depclean or the way portage will only show one mask at a time. So
I was curious...what have people that are *not* myself and my
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > How can we forget ...
> >
> > :D
>
> But I may take out something important. :/ I try to do that but I am
> getting older. I forget.
>
> I guess I made a lasting impression, albeit bad I guess.
Nah! Far from it, not to me anyway. :)
Wyatt Epp wrote:
Greets,
So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that
I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things
like the danger of depclean or the way portage will only show one mask
at a time. So I was curious...what have people that ar
On Friday 03 April 2009, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> or the way portage will only show one mask at a time.
that
Does anyone know how to transfer files over bluetooth with KDE4? It
used to "just work" in KDE3 by plugging in my bluetooth dongle, but I
don't know if it's the recent masking of bluez stuff or KDE4 but now
it just doesn't do anything. I feel like I'm missing something really
simple :)
Thanks,
Pa
On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Wyatt Epp wrote:
> > Greets,
> >
> > So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that
> > I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things
> > like the danger of depclean or the way portage will only sho
* Wyatt Epp (wyatt@gmail.com) [03.04.09 20:00]:
> Greets,
>
> So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that I
> had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things like the
> danger of depclean or the way portage will only show one mask at a time. So
2009/4/3 Sebastian Günther :
> Well honestly: nothing lately. depclean had never removed something what
> a -avtDuN and a revdep-rebuild couldn't repair.
See, though, that's exactly the problem I'm talking about. :) Right
now it seems a good chunk of the population uses it as a list command
with
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Wyatt Epp wrote:
Greets,
So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that
I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things
like the danger of depclean or the way portage wi
On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> Wyatt Epp wrote:
> >>> Greets,
> >>>
> >>> So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things
> >>> that I had come to accept as normal that I
2009/4/3 Sebastian Günther :
> Well honestly: nothing lately. depclean had never removed something what
> a -avtDuN and a revdep-rebuild couldn't repair.
I use depclean after every update of world for the past 5 years and
never had any disaster... I always thought the warnings (which have
been ton
Wyatt Epp wrote:
BTW: There is no need for an installer...
I'm inclined to agree with this. Installers lack flexibility.
I'd like to have a possibility of unattended installation.
Some kind of script which loads a prepared text-file with
parameters and does the rest.
There is a lot of typin
On Friday 03 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
> Wyatt Epp wrote:
> >> BTW: There is no need for an installer...
> >
> > I'm inclined to agree with this. Installers lack flexibility.
>
> I'd like to have a possibility of unattended installation.
> Some kind of script which loads a prepared text-file with
>
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> Greets,
>
> So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that I
> had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things like the
> danger of depclean or the way portage will only show one mask at a time. So
>
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:47:25 +0530, Masood Ahmed wrote:
> I like the -march=native and -mtune=native options.
As long as you don't use distcc with differing hardware.
--
Neil Bothwick
"Ubuntu" is an ancient African word, meaning "I can't configure
Slackware".
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:
> > I used eeXbuntu to install mine.
> OK, I'll try it. First some questions?
>
> Is eeeXbuntu an install/live distro?
Yes,with a script to copy it from CD to USB stick.
> Was there any wifi issues? Must have wifi throughout the proc
On Friday 03 April 2009, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> > Greets,
> >
> > So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that
> > I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things like
> > the danger of depclean or t
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 22:15:40 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > He asked what annoys me, and I answered truthfully :P
>
> yeah, but if you think about it for a moment you will see that an
> installer is the WRONG THING and then you won't be annoyed anymore but
> glad.
Didn't we have this di
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:27:57 +0200, Jarry wrote:
> I'd like to have a possibility of unattended installation.
> Some kind of script which loads a prepared text-file with
> parameters and does the rest.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/quickstart.php
--
Neil Bothwick
We are upping our standards
On Friday 03 April 2009 05:15:21 pm Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:47:25 +0530, Masood Ahmed wrote:
> > I like the -march=native and -mtune=native options.
>
> As long as you don't use distcc with differing hardware.
I did that by accident once and trust me, it's a unforgettable les
On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
I will agree that an installer doesn't belong near the top of anyones
"show stopper" list of Gentoo defects. Gentoo doesn't *need* an
installer and all previous attempts at one have bee
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
>
> portage does not remove the packages from the distfiles directory and all
> ebuilds are available from cvs even years after they have been removed.
>
First comment is incorrect, or correct if you're doing your regular
Volker routine
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 17:11, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
>
> I will agree that an installer doesn't belong near the top of anyones "show
> stopper" list of Gentoo defects. Gentoo doesn't *n
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>
>>
>> portage does not remove the packages from the distfiles directory and all
>> ebuilds are available from cvs even years after they have been removed.
>>
>
> First comment is
On Friday 03 April 2009, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 17:11, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> > On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
> >
> > I will agree that an installer doesn't belong near the top of anyones
> >
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> portage does not remove the packages from the distfiles directory and all
>>> ebuilds are available from cvs even
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
>
> Maybe a "sunset" overlay with old obsolete ebuilds to complement the
> "sunrise" overlay of things-yet-to-hit portage?
I like the idea but does it solve the root-cause issue - whatever that
might really be - for portage maintainers removing
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe a "sunset" overlay with old obsolete ebuilds to complement the
>> "sunrise" overlay of things-yet-to-hit portage?
>
> I like the idea but does it solve the root-cause issue -
090403 Wyatt Epp wrote:
> what have people that are *not* myself and my mate noticed
> that is mildly irritating and disruptive to the Gentoo experience?
Nothing at all serious: I remain very grateful to those who do the work.
But, I submitted Bug 255463 back on 2009-01-19 & there's been no reply
On Friday 03 April 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 22:15:40 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > He asked what annoys me, and I answered truthfully :P
> >
> > yeah, but if you think about it for a moment you will see that an
> > installer is the WRONG THING and then you won't be
Wyatt Epp wrote:
So I was curious...what have people that are /not/ myself and my mate
noticed that is mildly irritating and disruptive to the Gentoo experience?
Mildly irritating, disruptive, etc:
- Managing USE flags is sometimes quite irritating, having to fidget
around /etc/make.conf, /et
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:45:46 +0800
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 March 2009 10:07:03 Dale wrote:
> >> I do understand that getting something stable and working then
> >> wanting to keep it that way. I'm just wondering what h
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> I would still think its a problema.
> People would install Gentoo, get a functional system, not read the
> handbook, and flood the forums and this mailing list with already
> answered and handbook questions.
> Daniel da Veiga
>
I think the
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> Greets,
>
> So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that I
> had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things like the
> danger of depclean or the way portage will only show one mask at a time. So
I
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Its installer. I would prefer something like Sabayon's installer (which
is a Gentoo-based distro.)
there is no installer anymore. And th
On Saturday 04 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >>> On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Its installer. I would prefer something like Sabayon's installer
>
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
[...]
maybe, but at the high time of the installer the forum was full with clueless
(and it still is). Following the handbook is not hard.
If you don't have a second PC, it's not easy either. And besides, what
have the clueless done to you? :D Just let them be.
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Its installer. I would prefer something like Sabayon's installer
> (which
> is a Gentoo-b
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> maybe, but at the high time of the installer the forum was full with
>> clueless (and it still is). Following the handbook is not hard.
>
> If you don't have a second PC, it's not easy either. An
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Higgins wrote:
> Looks like I can fix the use flag and clean out ldap if I want to do so, but
> I'm stuck with
> pycrypto (or the build use flag):
Actually, sys-apps/portage has a PDEPEND on "|| ( >=dev-lang/python-2.5
>=dev-python/pycrypto-2
On Saturday 04 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > [...]
> > maybe, but at the high time of the installer the forum was full with
> > clueless (and it still is). Following the handbook is not hard.
>
> If you don't have a second PC, it's not easy either.
I wrote
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> maybe, but at the high time of the installer the forum was full with
>> clueless (and it still is). Following the handbook is not hard.
>
> If you don't have a second PC, it's not easy either. An
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> And besides, what
>> have the clueless done to you? :D Just let them be.
>
> well, I try to be a good member of the community - and that means helping in
> the forum. And it sucks
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:47:25 +0530
Masood Ahmed wrote:
> alain.didierj...@free.fr writes:
>
> I like the -march=native and -mtune=native options. It's the new thing
> in gcc 4.3 series.
-mtune=native can be dropped if -march=native is there already.
--
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
signatur
Hi all
I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml to create the LVM2 volume named vg
then create the logical volume /dev/vg/data. Everything went fine and I
can mount the volume /dev/vg/data to /mnt/data without any problem.
However, when I restart
62 matches
Mail list logo
