On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 02:10 -0500, toefraz wrote:
> unsubscribe
NO!
--
Iain Buchanan
Interestingly enough, since subroutine declarations can come anywhere,
you wouldn't have to put BEGIN {} at the beginning, nor END {} at the
end. Interesting, no? I wonder if Henry would like it. :-) --lwall
Hi,
I created a live CD by following the steps in this tutorial:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_custom_distro_(in_less_than_three_hours)
Everything works perfectly, except for one thing: I don't know how to
add drivers. If I just make && install them with DESTDIR=/real, the
drivers d
voodoo adam # python-updater
* Starting Python Updater from 2.4 to 2.5 :
* Adding to list: =x11-libs/vte-0.16.13
* Adding to list: =app-office/dia-0.96.1-r1
* Adding to list: =dev-libs/boost-1.34.1-r2
And if i run python-updater again after letting it rebuild these packages it
picks them
Sorry, should have googled first;
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=232467
On 9 Aug 2008, at 14:52, Yoav Luft wrote:
In an ideal world users should use their domain username &
password to log on when they sit down at the Linux box. And they
should be mounting the directories they need off the file server
by (double-clicking on a drive icon on their KDE desktop if
Hello,
I recently set up samba to allow authentification against Active
Directory for file sharing on a CentOS 4.5. Even if their installer is
supposed to do it correctly, it didn't work the way I wanted, so I had
to understand how to set it up manually.
The main problem I found with documen
Alan E. Davis wrote:
Norberto and Josh:
Thank you for the suggestion. It's on the back burner. I have the
space to experiment with it now. I have balked for the time being on
basis of, partly, my need to be able to swap drives in and out, and
have it clear in mind which partitions belong
Thanks, it works!
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yoav Luft wrote:
>
>> mount /boot
>> copied the kernel, reconfigurated grub, and rebooted.
>>
>
> You can also emerge debianutils (I think it's installed by default, but
> check first) which will enab
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:03:34 +0100 Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect that something changed recently on the way that USB devices are
> mounted. I noticed that mounting a USB flash drive has stopped working as
> follows:
[snip]
> $ pmount /dev/sda
> Error: device /dev/sda is not remova
Hi,
I ask it here because I really don't know where to ask it.
Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
I wonder in particular if:
- there are Linux systems using the BSD userlands
- there are Linux systems using completely non-standard userlands...
let's say, non-Unix tool
I recently started using tovid again and it seems to be having a lot of
problems with the programs it uses. The last time I used it was in
November and all worked well.
First there was a problem with libGL.so.1, it didn't seem to be on my
system. ldd `which mplayer` said it wasn't found. Af
b.n. schrieb:
Hi,
I ask it here because I really don't know where to ask it.
Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
I wonder in particular if:
- there are Linux systems using the BSD userlands
- there are Linux systems using completely non-standard userlands...
let's say
On 2008-08-10, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ask it here because I really don't know where to ask it.
>
> Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
What do you mean by "non-Gnu"?
SW for which the FSF doesn't own the copyrights?
SW which is distributed under
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2008-08-10, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I ask it here because I really don't know where to ask it.
Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
What do you mean by "non-Gnu"?
SW for which the FSF doesn't own the copyrights?
SW which is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
b.n. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ask it here because I really don't know where to ask it.
>
> Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
>
> I wonder in particular if:
> - there are Linux systems using the BSD userlands
> - there are Linux
On 2008-08-10, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
>>
>> What do you mean by "non-Gnu"?
>>
>> SW for which the FSF doesn't own the copyrights?
>>
>> SW which is distributed under something other than one of the
>>
Chuck Robey ha scritto:
You might possibly be missing one of the most basic (in organization)
differences between any BSD and any Linux is that BSD's are all built and
packaged with a set of userland programs. This doesn't include many user
applications, just the kind of things that you think of
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2008-08-10, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
What do you mean by "non-Gnu"?
SW for which the FSF doesn't own the copyrights?
SW which is distributed under something other than one of the
On Sonntag, 10. August 2008, b.n. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ask it here because I really don't know where to ask it.
>
> Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
linux + uclibc + busybox?
yes. And maybe you even get X or KDE run on it - google and tell us your
results ;)
http://www
On 2008-08-10, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry. Here is the definitive list of all software provided
> by the GNU project:
>
> http://directory.fsf.org/GNU
>
> Given how much software GNU provides, I imagine it's pretty much
> impossible to find a Linux or BSD these days tha
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2008-08-10, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The last time I did a basic FreeBSD install, it included Gnu
user-land stuff (e.g. gcc).
Anything else besides GCC?
I can't think of anything else off the top of my head, but it's
been a couple years since I'v
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 00:54 +0200, b.n. wrote:
> That's why I asked if there is some Linux that is not "a little bit" but
> *wildly* different, as to be almost unrecognizable as the Linux we're
> all familiar with (that usually is done by a bash/zsh/ksh shell + other
> gnu coreutils etc.)
>
>
Volker Armin Hemmann ha scritto:
On Sonntag, 10. August 2008, b.n. wrote:
Hi,
I ask it here because I really don't know where to ask it.
Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
linux + uclibc + busybox?
yes. And maybe you even get X or KDE run on it - google and tell us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
b.n. wrote:
> Chuck Robey ha scritto:
>> You might possibly be missing one of the most basic (in organization)
>> differences between any BSD and any Linux is that BSD's are all built and
>> packaged with a set of userland programs. This doesn't inclu
cifs.c -o mount.cifs || die "make
* mount.cifs failed";
* The die message:
* make mount.cifs failed
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
stack if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
'/var/log/portage/net-fs:mount-cifs-3.0.28:2008
On Montag, 11. August 2008, b.n. wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann ha scritto:
> > On Sonntag, 10. August 2008, b.n. wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I ask it here because I really don't know where to ask it.
> >>
> >> Is there a Linux system somewhere with a *non-GNU* userland?
> >
> > linux + uclibc + busyb
John covici wrote:
Hi. I tried to compile net-fs/mount-cifs because when I used smbfs I
got a very prominent message from the kernel saying that smbfs would
be removed in 2.6.27 and I should use cifs instead. However when I
tried to compile it, I got the following error:
less /usr/portage/net
on Monday 08/11/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> John covici wrote:
> > Hi. I tried to compile net-fs/mount-cifs because when I used smbfs I
> > got a very prominent message from the kernel saying that smbfs would
> > be removed in 2.6.27 and I should use cifs instead. Howeve
Hi all,
I was working in a shell with tar and I changed something where now when
I type "*" it interprets it as --exlucde
i.e
$ *
bash: --exlucde: command not found
or
$ ls *
ls: unrecognized option `--exlucde'
Try `ls --help' for more information.
how can I fix this?
thanks,
Ivan
looks like an "alias", maybe you have accidentaly edited .bashrc or
.bash_profile
hope this helps
Francisco
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Ivan Alden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was working in a shell with tar and I changed something where now when
> I type "*" it interprets it
2008/8/11 Francisco Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> looks like an "alias", maybe you have accidentaly edited .bashrc or
> .bash_profile
>
Just input alias in shell to check if the alias about * exists.
> hope this helps
> Francisco
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Ivan Alden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Montag, 11. August 2008, Ivan Alden wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was working in a shell with tar and I changed something where now when
> I type "*" it interprets it as --exlucde
>
> i.e
>
> $ *
> bash: --exlucde: command not found
>
> or
>
> $ ls *
> ls: unrecognized option `--exlucde'
> Try `ls --he
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:57:26PM +, Ivan Alden wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was working in a shell with tar and I changed something where now when
> I type "*" it interprets it as --exlucde
>
> i.e
>
> $ *
> bash: --exlucde: command not found
>
> or
>
> $ ls *
> ls: unrecognized option `--exl
33 matches
Mail list logo
