[gentoo-user] fix fstab for tripleboot

2006-10-17 Thread Thufir
How can I fix line 10 of /etc/fstab so that, like /mnt/windows, it's just automagically available for read and write? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf -n 1 # grub.conf generated by anaconda 2 # 3 # Note that you do not have to rerun grub aft

Re: [gentoo-user] fix fstab for tripleboot

2006-10-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2006 08:57 schrieb ext Thufir: > How can I fix line 10 of /etc/fstab so that, like /mnt/windows, it's just > automagically available for read and write? > >ext3users,owner,rw,umask=000 Change it to "ext3 defaults". HTH... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xf86-driver-ati-6.6.3 fails

2006-10-17 Thread Ow Mun Heng
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 08:11 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Monday 16 October 2006 22:17, Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I started an update world today which ran through xorg-server and xorg-x11 > > before it went along to update x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.6.3. This > > package tries to

[gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Marco Calviani
Hi list, i was running an emerge -e world while emerge stuck on a package (that was openinventor). The problem was that with the modular X, the "testing" version was necessary. Now i would like to resume the emerge process, but however with emerge --resume, Portage wants to install the older ver

[gentoo-user] Re: problems making shareable directory shareable

2006-10-17 Thread Remy Blank
Richard Broersma Jr wrote: > I know that I can execute a umask every > time the users log in to insure that all new created files will have > the correct premissions, but is this really the correct what to > handle this problem? That's one way of doing it, which I have seen used on RedHat distribu

Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 09:20, Marco Calviani wrote: >i was running an emerge -e world while emerge stuck on a package > (that was openinventor). The problem was that with the modular X, the > "testing" version was necessary. Now i would like to resume the emerge > process, but however with

Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:20:02 +0200, Marco Calviani wrote: >i was running an emerge -e world while emerge stuck on a package > (that was openinventor). The problem was that with the modular X, the > "testing" version was necessary. Now i would like to resume the emerge > process, but however wi

Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Marco Calviani
Hi Bo, # python resume_list.py should give you the resume list. Then you can alter the resulting list and emerge the altered list with --oneshot ... thanks for this. This script gave me the resume list. However i'm not able to give the file to emerge... i've tried with emerge -1 < resume.list

Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 10:07, Marco Calviani wrote: > Hi Bo, > > > # python resume_list.py > > > > should give you the resume list. Then you can alter the resulting list > > and emerge the altered list with --oneshot ... > > thanks for this. This script gave me the resume list. However i'm not

Re: [gentoo-user] Modify emerge --resume

2006-10-17 Thread Marco Calviani
Thanks Bo and Neil, # echo $(python resume_list.py) # emerge -va1 $(python resume_list.py) both of your solutions solved my problem! Thanks again, mc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] prelink -aqR -> Segmentation fault

2006-10-17 Thread Qiangning Hong
I followed HOWTO Hashstyle on gentoo-wiki (http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Hashstyle) days ago. However, I found /etc/cron.daily/prelink produces Segmentation fault. In command line, I tried the following: # prelink -aqR Segmentation fault How to resolve this? `emerge --info` followed: Portage

[gentoo-user] Re: speedtouch router 3 pc LAN problems

2006-10-17 Thread Mick
On Monday 16 October 2006 07:24, Tim Barker wrote: > Here is the setup: > > Workgroup LAN currently with 2 PCs (will be 3). XP home is the OS. Router > is supplied by Bigpond, a Speedtouch 536 (or 538?) router/modem. > > Thought I configured the modem correctly, VNC was in the setup for home > netw

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xf86-driver-ati-6.6.3 fails [SOLVED]

2006-10-17 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 07:11, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Monday 16 October 2006 22:17, Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I started an update world today which ran through xorg-server and > > xorg-x11 before it went along to update x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.6.3. > > This package tries to c

Re: [gentoo-user] IMAP servers

2006-10-17 Thread Steve [Gentoo]
Roman Zilka wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:26:23AM +0100, Joost Roeleveld wrote: > >>> it appears that there is one connection per folder >>> and one process per connection... which seems (to me at least) to be >>> overkill. >>> >> Having never used dovecot, I can't comment on this.

Re: [gentoo-user] What does "future video mode" mean for the i810 xorg driver?

2006-10-17 Thread Matthew R. Lee
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 10:04, Wolfgang Liebich wrote: > Hi, > I'm using xorg-server 1.1.1-r1, with i810 driver for the Intel 915 on > board graphics adapter. I tried to use a SUN GDM5410 monitor (with > matching adapter cable), which now is hanging on a SUN workstation. > According to the OSD i

[gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Stephane Pointu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I have a question about portage behaviour: I have a package built in a certain version in /usr/portage/package but this version is not in portage tree (no ebuild for it). If I do a "emerge -kuav world" it takes this package but if I do a "emer

Re: [gentoo-user] fix fstab for tripleboot

2006-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 08:57, Thufir wrote: > How can I fix line 10 of /etc/fstab so that, like /mnt/windows, it's > just automagically available for read and write? [snip] > 9 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/windows > vfatusers,owner,rw,umask=000 0 0 > 10 #/dev/hdb4

Re: [gentoo-user] partition scheme

2006-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 08:54, Thufir wrote: > For hdb, what's a good partitioning scheme?  I want to go with > reiser, and keep the vfat (for win2k).  I have 512MB RAM, should I > change the swap size?  Is there a big advantage to using LVM versus > just a regular root partition? Hi, This is

Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 11:44, Stephane Pointu wrote: > Hi all, I have a question about portage behaviour: > > I have a package built in a certain version in /usr/portage/package > but this version is not in portage tree (no ebuild for it). If I do a > "emerge -kuav world" it takes this package

Re: [gentoo-user] Problem installing amavisd-new (Gentoo box)

2006-10-17 Thread Ronald Vazquez
Richard Fish wrote: Take a look at this file, it will have the actual error message in it. If it doesn't make sense to you, feel free to post the contents here. -Richard Richard: Thank you for your response. I haven't had much time to really look. Perhaps this evening... Ok, here are the

Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 11:44, Stephane Pointu wrote: > Hi all, I have a question about portage behaviour: > > I have a package built in a certain version in /usr/portage/package but > this version is not in portage tree (no ebuild for it). If I do a > "emerge -kuav world" it takes this package

Re: [gentoo-user] Xorg upgrade

2006-10-17 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 07:21, Anthony E. Caudel wrote: > Just upgraded to xorg-x11-7.1. Definitely faster than 7.0. glxgears > runs at just under 19,000FPS, an increase of about 12%. Hmm, mine comes up with this: $ glxgears libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x4b 2445 fr

[gentoo-user] Re: not accepting connections

2006-10-17 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 07:25, Larry Brigman wrote: > I have real vncserver (4.1.2) running on WinXP (sp2) with > ZoneAlarm. ZoneAlarm is allowing vncserver server access but > the icon in the tray says that it is not accepting connections. > > I don't have any limits on connections in the conn

[gentoo-user] Re: Intel HDA soundcard, microphones and skype

2006-10-17 Thread Moshe Kamensky
* Matthew R. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12/10/06 09:24]: > On Wednesday 11 October 2006 22:19, Richard Fish wrote: > > On 10/11/06, Matthew R. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the help & info. I'm in the UK at the moment and it's > getting late. I'll try it in the morning Thanks > Matt

[gentoo-user] ati-driver update

2006-10-17 Thread oskar kapala
Hi, I have hp zv6000 (amd64) with ati radeon x200. I'm using: x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.24.8 or x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.5.8.0 Both work more less ok, but work. I had >=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.25.18 in my /etc/portage/package.mask because drivers later than 8.24.8 doesn't support my card (

Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Stephane Pointu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK. Actually I didn't know that the ebuild was in the package. However when I tried to uncompress the archive to see what's in it, I had the following error: bzip2: (stdin): trailing garbage after EOF ignored I have the same error on all packages in /u

Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Stephane Pointu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, You didn't get my point. The global idea was that I thought that Portage first checks ebuilds before installing any package, and as there was no ebuild, the package shouldn't get installed. I did not know that there was the ebuild in the package i

Re: [gentoo-user] ati-driver update

2006-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 13:47, oskar kapala wrote: > Hi, > > I have hp zv6000 (amd64) with ati radeon x200. I'm using: > x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.24.8 > or > x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.5.8.0 > Both work more less ok, but work. > > I had >=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.25.18 in my > /etc/portage/p

Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 14:12, Stephane Pointu wrote: > Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: [SNIP] > > qtbz2 from app-portage/portage-utils can be used to extract the metadata > > from a tbz2 file.. > [SNIP] > I guess it's in the "trailing garbage". Is there a way to extract it? Was the above unclear or

Re: [gentoo-user] dispatch-conf spells disaster-RESOLVED

2006-10-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Monday 16 October 2006 15:53, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] dispatch-conf spells disaster-RESOLVED': > But where is CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, since grepping > make.conf only returns the one line, CONFIG_PROTECT? Gentoo provides defaults for both values. Your value

Re: [gentoo-user] dispatch-conf spells disaster-RESOLVED

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 16 October 2006 22:53, maxim wexler wrote: > But where is CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, since grepping > make.conf only returns the one line, CONFIG_PROTECT? Looking at the output of the following commands should answer your question. # env | grep ^CONFIG_PROTECT # find /etc/env.d | xargs grep

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?

2006-10-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:57:57 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > Maybe I didn't make myself clear enough. It works as designed. I did > not overwrite the files, but I'm getting annoyed at having to tell > etc-update "NO" every few weeks when I run etc-update. There are > anywhere from 10 to 40 files

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?

2006-10-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 15 October 2006 14:27, Neil Bothwick wrote: > As I've mentioned several times before, there was a patch to > dispatch-conf to do just this. You added the files you didn't want > touching, ever, to a line in the config file. Unfortunately, the patch > hasn't been updated for a couple of ye

Re: [gentoo-user] problems rendering unicode characters

2006-10-17 Thread fei huang
I'm not sure, but have a look at your locale settings.. good luckdaniel

[gentoo-user] SMTP Authentication

2006-10-17 Thread Tito Valentin
Hello list: I have been trying to get SMTP authentication on Gentoo to work with no success. I am running qmail (netqmail package) with dovecot and saslauth. I am able to connect and read my mail through IMAP fine. The problem is that I cannot send email using my own SMTP server due to an authe

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?

2006-10-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:16:01 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > > As I've mentioned several times before, there was a patch to > > dispatch-conf to do just this. You added the files you didn't want > > touching, ever, to a line in the config file. Unfortunately, the patch > > hasn't been updated f

Re: [gentoo-user] Do you leave it on? USE="berkdb"

2006-10-17 Thread Brian Davis
I have mine off. However, you should see which packages you have installed that would take advantage of it before you turn it off globally. Grant wrote: Do you guys leave the berkdb USE flag on? It seems to be a default flag, but I've been using -berkdb in make.conf ever since I started using

Re: [gentoo-user] problems rendering unicode characters

2006-10-17 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 10/17/06, fei huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure, but have a look at your locale settings.. good luckI currently have LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 and LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 set in /etc/env.d/02locale. And I have the appropriate env variables.  Does anyone know which variable might affect dis

Re: [gentoo-user] IMAP servers

2006-10-17 Thread Régis Décamps
On 10/17/06, Steve [Gentoo] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm no longer so sure about when imap processes are spawned or terminated - but there seem to be a non-deterministic "lots" of them for each Thunderbird session. There is one process create each time Thunderbird opens a new connection, up

Re: [gentoo-user] Problem installing amavisd-new (Gentoo box)

2006-10-17 Thread Richard Fish
On 10/17/06, Ronald Vazquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thank you for your response. I haven't had much time to really look. Perhaps this evening... Ok, here are the contents of the output file: # cat amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch-8250.out * amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.p

Re: [gentoo-user] ati-driver update

2006-10-17 Thread Richard Fish
On 10/17/06, oskar kapala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I've tried to emerge world it failed, because xorg-server and xf86-video-ati require to upgrade this driver. xorg 7.1 or later require newer drivers. You either have to use the xf86-video-ati (the open source drivers included with x.org

[gentoo-user] Wings3d breaks X-window

2006-10-17 Thread JC Denton
Hello!I have a big problem. When I try to construct something with wings3d my x-windows system breaks. I can put a boby or something like this but as soon as I try to rotate the object or manipulate it in some way the system does the same like Ctrl+Shift+Del would do. It just kicks me of my system!

Re: [gentoo-user] partition scheme

2006-10-17 Thread David Grant
I'd like to share mine with the world: Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1490439391348+ 7 H

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: etc-update vs dispatch-conf

2006-10-17 Thread David Grant
On 10/13/06, Remy Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: maxim wexler wrote: > What does the group think? I don't know about the group, but I use etc-update and keep all of /etc in a Subversion working copy. This allows quickly seeing any changes made on updates and emerges, reverting changes if anyth

Re: [gentoo-user] Wings3d breaks X-window

2006-10-17 Thread b.n.
JC Denton ha scritto: I have a big problem. When I try to construct something with wings3d my x-windows system breaks. I can put a boby or something like this but as soon as I try to rotate the object or manipulate it in some way the system does the same like Ctrl+Shift+Del would do. It just ki

[gentoo-user] emerge swt failed: cannot find -lGL

2006-10-17 Thread Iain Buchanan
Hi all, I was just performing a routing update recently, and swt failed with this error: * Building OpenGL component cc -O -Wall -DSWT_VERSION=3232 -DLINUX -DGTK -I/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/include -I/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/include/linux -fPIC -c glx.c cc -O -Wall -DSWT_VERSION=3232 -D

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge swt failed: cannot find -lGL

2006-10-17 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 10:55 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > Hi all, > > I was just performing a routing update recently, and swt failed with > this error: > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: > cannot find -lGL I worked around it by doing this: $ cd /usr/li

[gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread maxim wexler
Hello group, I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of date. I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get the latest versions of software when needed. Here's the sync line in make.conf. SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.

Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread maxim wexler
>digg2ogg should be dir2ogg __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Are newer versions masked for some reason? When a sync is done it gets all the mirror has. On Tuesday October 17 2006 23:37, maxim wexler wrote: > Hello group, > > I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge > digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of > date. > > I thought sy

Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Drew
I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get the latest versions of software when needed. All sync does is download the latest ebuilds into your local portage tree. If the ebuild maintainers haven't gotten around to creating an ebuild for package 'foo-1.2.0' (the lastest) and are still

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?

2006-10-17 Thread Walter Dnes
Thank you, thank you, thank you verrry verrry much That's *EXACTLY what I'm looking for. -- Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In linux /sbin/init is Job #1 My musings on technology and security at http://techsec.blog.ca -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] gnome exit clean

2006-10-17 Thread Vladimir G. Ivanovic
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 10:51 -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote: > Shaochun Wang wrote: > > It's /etc/X11/gdm/PostSession > > And I was mistaken, after all! :) So good for the find command :P If you know the file or directory name (or even part of it), rlocate is much, much, much faster than

[gentoo-user] Re: dispatch-conf spells disaster-RESOLVED?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 16 October 2006 22:26, maxim wexler wrote: >> localhost heathen # grep CONFIG /etc/make.conf >> CONFIG_PROTECT="-*" > > WHY did you set that?? He already said, why he did that. He was annoyed by the list of files that he's got to check after

[gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>digg2ogg > > should be dir2ogg 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? Alexander Skwar -- Don't SANFORIZE me!! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello group, > > I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge > digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of > date. There is no digg2ogg in the tree. > I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get > the latest versions of software

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Darren Kirby
Quoth the Alexander Skwar > · maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>digg2ogg > > > > should be dir2ogg > > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be diffe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 22:53 -0700, Darren Kirby wrote: > Quoth the Alexander Skwar > > · maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>digg2ogg > > > > > > should be dir2ogg > > > > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different > > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2og

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
Darren Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quoth the Alexander Skwar >> · maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>digg2ogg >> > >> > should be dir2ogg >> >> 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different >> version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? > > Well, I'm the upst

[gentoo-user] sodipodi

2006-10-17 Thread Stéphane ANCELOT
Hi, I can not find sodipodi in emerge where is it ? Bye -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list