On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:29:06 -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> If you run
>
> emerge -av --noreplace
>
> on all the packages that
>
> emerge -av --depclean
>
> wants to clean, then depclean will no longer complain.
This is equivalent to fixing low oil pressure in y
I got this when switching the user. Any advice would help.
Thanks,
Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ su root
Password:
configuration error - unknown item 'FAILLOG_ENAB' (notify administrator)
configuration error - unknown item 'LASTLOG_ENAB' (notify administrator)
configuration error - unknown item 'MO
Hi,
Alex Fortwinder a écrit :
> I got this when switching the user. Any advice would help.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-366499.html
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
command not found. As root everything is ok. Suggestions?
Alex.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Alex Fortwinder a écrit :
> command not found. As root everything is ok. Suggestions?
# emerge sudo
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
> Which is the best for organization mail server.
NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
sendmail has had numerous holes "way back then". And I
dislike the configuration "language".
So, I'd suggest postfix or exim. I personally use Postfix
always
Done. Example on how to use it? I tried sodo -u to no avail. Thanks
Alex.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:19:57 +0200
Fabrice Delliaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Fortwinder a écrit :
> > command not found. As root everything is ok. Suggestions?
>
> # emerge sudo
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo
On 7/31/06, Fabrice Delliaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Sudo_config
There's an official guide, as well: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/sudo-guide.xml
--
ellotheth rimmwen
* monjoy *
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
> Which is the best for organization mail server.
NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
sendmail has had numerous holes "way back then". And I
dislike the configuration "language".
So, I'd
hello!
after installing a zope instance, I emerged mymediamanager. My zopectl debug
log follows:
Starting debugger (the name "app" is bound to the top-level Zope object)
2006-07-31 15:34:11 ERROR Zope Could not import Products.MyMediaManager
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/zo
Michael Crute wrote:
I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is
arguably THE MOST secure mail server
(http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html).
It may be 'secure' from that respect, but not from any other. In it's
default settings, it's far too accepting and is a pain to cl
On Mon, July 31, 2006 8:28 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
>
>> Which is the best for organization mail server.
>
> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
> sendmail has had numerous holes "way back then". And I
> dislike the configuration "language".
Collins Richey wrote:
> The only gotcha I found was with the xorg modular installation. After
> completing the basic installation, I did an 'emerge xfce4' and let
> portage calculate all the dependancies including xorg. When all was
> said and done, I discovered that the automatic dependancy select
Michael Crute wrote:
> On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
>> > Which is the best for organization mail server.
>>
>> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
> I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is
Thanks again, but... nothing is changed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo -l
User nabokov may run the following commands on this host:
(ALL) ALL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ pppoe-stop
bash: pppoe-stop: command not found
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:03:10 -0400
"ellotheth rimmwen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Never mind, I figured that one out. Thanks for the help.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:28:49 +0400
Alex Fortwinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks again, but... nothing is changed?
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo -l
> User nabokov may run the following commands on this host:
> (ALL) ALL
> [E
On Monday 31 July 2006 16:28, Alex Fortwinder wrote:
> Thanks again, but... nothing is changed?
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo -l
> User nabokov may run the following commands on this host:
> (ALL) ALL
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ pppoe-stop
> bash: pppoe-stop: command not found
>
>
Try "sudo pppo
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Crute wrote:
> On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
>> > Which is the best for organization mail server.
>>
>> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
> I would b
When I start screen as a user, I got the following:
Cannot open your teminal 'dev/tty1' - please check.
When I run w3m in console it says that permission denied to dev/tty1
How to set up permission? Thanks
Alex
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Alex Fortwinder wrote:
When I start screen as a user, I got the following:
Cannot open your teminal 'dev/tty1' - please check.
When I run w3m in console it says that permission denied to dev/tty1
How to set up permission? Thanks
Alex
chmod 666 /dev/tty1
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
El Lunes, 31 de Julio de 2006 08:08, Andreas Schoelver escribió:
> Hi Jesús
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:11:30 +0200
> Jesús Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > My favorite browser is firefox, but how do I tell both of mono-tools
> > > and gnome about that?
> > >
> > > Andreas
> >
>
quoth the Mike:
> Alex Fortwinder wrote:
> > When I start screen as a user, I got the following:
> > Cannot open your teminal 'dev/tty1' - please check.
> > When I run w3m in console it says that permission denied to dev/tty1
> > How to set up permission? Thanks
> > Alex
>
> chmod 666 /dev/tty1
Or
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
Which is the best for organization mail server.
NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
Some clarification on the security of qmail:
qmail has no known holes be default other than still playing the MTA
game by 1998
Michael Crute schrieb:
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Crute wrote:
> On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
>> > Which is the best for organization mail server.
>>
>> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good perfo
El Lunes, 31 de Julio de 2006 18:58, Richard Fish escribió:
> On 7/31/06, Jesús Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tinkered a bit with this and came along with this ebuild (i have no
> > idea
>
> You could have saved yourself some trouble by reading the ChangeLog
> for yelp, which contains:
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not here to start a war over the merits of any one MTA... but I
> think it's worth reading DJBs rebuttal of the accusations made by
> Postfix's author.
Well, that page that I quoted from is NOT from the Postfix
author. It's from somebo
On 7/31/06, Randy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Collins Richey wrote:
> The only gotcha I found was with the xorg modular installation. After
> completing the basic installation, I did an 'emerge xfce4' and let
> portage calculate all the dependancies including xorg. When all was
> said and d
Hi,
on my system Xawtv is installed with USE="zvbi", so that I
have `scantv' enclosed. Anyway, it doesn't work:
# scantv
[...]
vbi: open failed [/dev/vbi]
open /dev/vbi: Invalid argument
#
I wonder how this error message could arise because of the
following:
# dd if=/dev/vbi bs=8 co
On 7/31/06, Bertram Scharpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
on my system Xawtv is installed with USE="zvbi", so that I
have `scantv' enclosed. Anyway, it doesn't work:
# scantv
[...]
vbi: open failed [/dev/vbi]
open /dev/vbi: Invalid argument
"strace -e open scantv" might give more inf
Hello,
Since I've got to install a web server on an older machine (PIII)
and this web pages suggest that 2006.1 will be released in August,
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/
I thought I'd ask if anybody can point me to an early release
or testing release of 2006.1 liveCD
or just a guess
Hi everybody.I am new in Gentoo's world: I have just installed it.My trouble is in downloading packages went I emege it. I can ping distfiles.gentoo.org, but it doesn't download anything. Output is:
***Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org...1.0.0.0Connecting to distfiles.gentoo.org|1.0.0.0|:80... failed:
On 7/31/06, Marco Fabbri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everybody.
I am new in Gentoo's world: I have just installed it.
Welcome
My trouble is in downloading packages went I emege it. I can ping
distfiles.gentoo.org, but it doesn't download anything. Output is:
You should probably try s
Thanks Richard! It works!I am in debt!2006/7/31, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You should probably try setting a different mirror for GENTOO_MIRRORSin /etc/make.conf. You can see the current mirror list here:http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/mirrors.xml
-Richard-- Marco
On 7/31/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Since I've got to install a web server on an older machine (PIII)
and this web pages suggest that 2006.1 will be released in August,
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/
I thought I'd ask if anybody can point me to an early release
or testin
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
Releases are not very important for Gentoo, if you have a live
internet connection (which is not REQUIRED, but will make your system
a lot more useful with Gentoo) after the whole process you'll get the
latest Gentoo anyway.
I think the idea is to skip the five hour gcc
any have a hint, my gentoo desktop box stalls booting at 'mounting local
file systems' for a sudden. there's no system config files i alerted,
nothing at all. from win i see all my ext3 partitions, all VFAT are there
too. whatshoul i look for?
martins
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing lis
On Monday 31 July 2006 07:24, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 7/30/06, Andreas Schoelver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sounds good, ...
> > but: I performed a revdep-rebuild in between which did the downgrade of
> > neon to 0.24.7, but the remerge of rapidsvn failed then.
>
> Hmm, maybe try to "emerge --
On 7/31/06, Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
any have a hint, my gentoo desktop box stalls booting at 'mounting local
file systems' for a sudden. there's no system config files i alerted,
If you are using ldap, it can cause long delays for things that occur
before networking is active when s
The problem persists... Even if I changed mirror (it worked for a while) I still have to download packages manually on my windows pc and then trensfer the files.It's strange: it download some packeges, but not some others. Some packages are available on some server and not in some others. Some pack
On 7/31/06, Marco Fabbri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem persists...
Even if I changed mirror (it worked for a while) I still have to download
packages manually on my windows pc and then trensfer the files.
It's strange: it download some packeges, but not some others. Some packages
are av
2006/8/1, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/31/06, Marco Fabbri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> The problem persists...>> Even if I changed mirror (it worked for a while) I still have to download
> packages manually on my windows pc and then trensfer the files.> It's strange: it download some pack
Resolving mi.mirror.garr.it... 1.0.0.0
mi.mirror.garr.it resolves to 193.206.139.34, maybe you have a DNS
issue? Did you setup /etc/resolv.conf properly?
Can you test "ping mi.mirror.garr.it" to make sure your machine can
actually resolve it's IP properly?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> Even if I changed mirror (it worked for a while) I still have to
download
> packages manually on my windows pc and then trensfer the files.
> It's strange: it download some packeges, but not some others.
Can you give some examples? Maybe the packages that are not
dow
On 7/31/06, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> Releases are not very important for Gentoo, if you have a live
> internet connection (which is not REQUIRED, but will make your system
> a lot more useful with Gentoo) after the whole process you'll get the
> latest Gentoo a
It has come to my attention that "Reply-To" Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html .
For example, in my gmail account I see something like this in the
(prettified) header of each message from Gentoo's mailing lists:
From: Marco Fabbri <
It has been discussed before and IMHO should not change.
Please if you want to discuss go somewhere else like IRC.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:10:48 -0400
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov wrote:
> It has come to my attention that "Reply-To" Munging is not a good idea
> to have on mailing lists:
> http://w
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:10:48PM -0400, Penguin Lover Michael [Plouj]
Ploujnikov squawked:
> Who is in charge of the mailing lists and would be the best person to
> suggest this to? Should I send this to a different gentoo-* list?
Big discussion over this about 18 months ago.
http://thread.gm
On 7/31/06, Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It has come to my attention that "Reply-To" Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html .
That is a matter of opinion. I find the Reply-To munging to be very helpful.
Who
On 7/31/06, Marco Fabbri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Resolving mi.mirror.garr.it... 1.0.0.0
Um, ok, somehow you resolved both mi.mirror.garr.it and
distfiles.gentoo.org to 1.0.0.0. Even if that was a valid IP address,
I would say your DNS server is lying to you. Try using a sane DNS
server in
Big discussion over this about 18 months ago.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/120320/focus=120320
Thanks a lot. I didn't find the search functions on the archives sites
very helpful in finding an old thread about this.
The change was made as you suggested, without announcemen
there is something wrong with your name resolution: distfiles.gentoo.org does
not have IP address 1.0.0.0
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:55:55 +0200
Marco Fabbri wrote:
> Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org...1.0.0.0
> Connecting to distfiles.gentoo.org|1.0.0.0|:80... failed: Connection timed
> out.
> Retry
Daniel da Veiga gmail.com> writes:
> > > Releases are not very important for Gentoo, if you have a live
> > > internet connection (which is not REQUIRED, but will make your system
> > > a lot more useful with Gentoo) after the whole process you'll get the
> > > latest Gentoo anyway.
> > I think
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:43:09PM -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
>
> My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart
> enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly.
>
Here, here.
--
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
pgpa1ta5KFB8F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 7/31/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel da Veiga gmail.com> writes:
> > > Releases are not very important for Gentoo, if you have a live
> > > internet connection (which is not REQUIRED, but will make your system
> > > a lot more useful with Gentoo) after the whole process you'll g
I followed this guide to set up printing:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/printing-howto.xml
but it didn't start working until I emerged foomatic. The guide
doesn't mention foomatic whatsoever. My printer is a Brother HL-2040
laser.
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Grant wrote:
> I followed this guide to set up printing:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/printing-howto.xml
>
> but it didn't start working until I emerged foomatic. The guide
> doesn't mention foomatic whatsoever. My printer is a Brother HL-2040
> laser.
Maybe file a bug against docs?
--
ge
Grant wrote:
I followed this guide to set up printing:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/printing-howto.xml
but it didn't start working until I emerged foomatic. The guide
doesn't mention foomatic whatsoever. My printer is a Brother HL-2040
laser.
The latest cups ebuild will force you to install
2006/8/1, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/31/06, Marco Fabbri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Resolving mi.mirror.garr.it... 1.0.0.0I would say your DNS server is lying to you.
You are right. Shame on me.Now I use ip addres instead or url, and it works. I will check network configuration out.T
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov schrieb:
It has come to my attention that "Reply-To" Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
This is wrong. It is *USEFUL*!
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.html
and when I click "Reply" ("Reply to all" option does not exist for
Gentoo
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:28:04 +0100
Steve Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I think that the fundamental problem is that the neon API changes between
> versions, so rapidsvn will only compile against one version of neon while
> gnome-vfs will only compile against a different version.
>
> I
Alexander Skwar schrieb:
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov schrieb:
It has come to my attention that "Reply-To" Munging is not a good idea
to have on mailing lists:
This is wrong. It is *USEFUL*!
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
Alexander Skwar
--
like:
When being alive at
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:59:45 -0700
"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/30/06, Andreas Schoelver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But why does USE="mozilla" *not* help?
>
> Because mozilla is being removed from the tree due to security problems.
Thanks for all the informations from Jes
62 matches
Mail list logo
