On Fri, 26 May 2006 07:48:30 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Has the additional advantage, that it lists all new and updates
> > packages, when the sync is finished.
>
> You don't know eix, do you? Because, what you list here as an
> "advantage" is no advantage, as eix does the same.
Also, unl
On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:21:42 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > I didn't even have to edit /boot/grub/menu.lst!
>
> Are you sure you're running it if you didn't have to edit grub? Does
> `uname -r` agree with the new version you just installed?
make install symlinks the new kernel to vmlinuz and
On Thu, 25 May 2006 20:56:01 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Then I did an umerge and emerge again. I ran the configurations script.
> But, it was schizophrenic about it. Below is what it said at the end of
> the configure; you'll see it says the module loads perfectly, then it
> says it has been
Hello.
New KDE ebuilds feature a USE flag called "kdehiddenvisibility", which
is described as:
[-] kdehiddenvisibility - Makes KDE symbols hidden by default, requires GCC
4.1 (experimental)
Well, this doesn't tell me much. What would I get, if I'd enable this
flag? Where can I read more ab
Hello!
Is it required to do a "emerge -e world" when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
Alexander Skwar
--
Life is like an egg stain on your chin -- you can lick it, but it still
won't go away.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> Forgive my ignorance, but what is RSYNC?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync
basically, portage use rsync to update the information on packages
(ebuilds) in /usr/portage (with emerge --sync)
> If anything, this is a indicator that I need to try and contribute to
> the portage project... at lea
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello!
Is it required to do a "emerge -e world" when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
I don't think so.
http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060522-newsletter.xml
| To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
| that is required is to upgrade
On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:46:24 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Is it required to do a "emerge -e world" when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
> gcc 3.4.6?
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
"To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is required is to upgrade GCC a
Hello!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ hostname -d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cat /etc/conf.d/domainname
# /etc/conf.d/domainname
# When setting up resolv.conf, what should take precedence?
# If you wish to always override DHCP/whatever, set this to 1.
OVERRIDE=1
# To have a proper FQDN, you need to setup /et
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility should tell you all you need to know about
the new symbol visibility features of gcc.
On Friday, 26 May 2006 17:12, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> New KDE ebuilds feature a USE flag called "kdehiddenvisibility", which
> is described as:
>
> [-] kdehidde
oops there was a little typo:
> $ echo "sys-apps/portage ~x86" >> /etc/portage/package.use
should be:
$ echo "sys-apps/portage ~x86" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 26 May 2006 10:09, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ hostname -d
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cat /etc/conf.d/domainname
> # /etc/conf.d/domainname
>
> # When setting up resolv.conf, what should take precedence?
> # If you wish to always override DHCP/whatever, set thi
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:09:27 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> # To have a proper FQDN, you need to setup /etc/hosts
> and /etc/resolv.conf # properly (domain entry in /etc/resolv.conf, and
> FQDN in /etc/hosts).
What do these files contain?
--
Neil Bothwick
UNIX is the OS of the future and alw
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> New KDE ebuilds feature a USE flag called "kdehiddenvisibility", which
> is described as:
>
> [-] kdehiddenvisibility - Makes KDE symbols hidden by default, requires
> GCC 4.1 (experimental)
>
> Well, this doesn't tell me much. What would I get, i
> Now I remember. It just sort of hit me all at once. I had to re-emerge
> all this:
>
> > 1137403163: Started emerge on: Jan 16, 2006 03:19:23
> > 1137403163: *** emerge --verbose gnome-icon-theme
> > evolution-data-server hicolor-icon-theme miscfiles gconfmm madplay
> > libglade gnome-vfsmm g
Hello. In an office we helped set up, there are a lot of X terminals for the
clerks. (These X terminals are the old computers from school's lab,
installed simple Gentoo Linux only to start X). Now they need VIOP, is it
possible? I mean, is it possible the clerks use VOIP on X terminals, when
the t
:
# emerge-webrsync -v
Fetching most recent snapshot
Attempting to fetch file dated: 20060526
--11:10:45--
http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/snapshots/portage-20060526.tar.bz2.md5sum
=>
`/var/tmp/emerge-webrsync/portage-20060526.tar.bz2.md5sum'
Resolving www.mirr
> > Hi,
> > Currently i don't have a X-enabled hardened system (only a router).
> > Would suggest at least two/three ways to check things.
> > 1.start mozilla from a console, check/post error logs;
> > 2.use 'strace' to start mozilla, post strace logs.
>
> I already wrote about these two; no error
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility should tell you all you need to know about
the new symbol visibility features of gcc.
It tell's me more than I want to know :)
Thanks for the pointer!
Alexander Skwar
--
The Bible is not my Book and Christianity is not my religio
Graham Murray wrote:
One thing to note is that if you want to use kdehiddenvisibility then
you will have to re-emerge qt-3.3.6-r1 before rebuilding KDE as the
KDE builds (upstream) will disable hidden visibility unless qt
was built with the hidden visibility patch which is only applied when
buil
Bo Andresen wrote:
Hi
I am having problems with the elog mail module failing to send mail due to the
following error:
"!!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:\n{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
(504, ': Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address')}"
I am using my ISP's SMTP serve
Friday 26 May 2006 10:46 skrev Etaoin Shrdlu:
> I seem to remember that this was somehow related to /etc/hosts, look:
>
> # cat /etc/hosts
Changing:
> 10.0.0.10 mybox mybox.my.domain
to:
> 10.0.0.10 mybox.my.domain mybox
has just solved this issue for me. :) Thanks!
> Don't know whether
Friday 26 May 2006 12:03 skrev Alexander Skwar:
> I'm using ssmtp and thus also have this problem. Is there any
> solution, which does NOT require patching portage, like suggested
> in the above mentioned bug?
As I have stated to the bug report this issue was solved for me with portage
2.1_pre9-r
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 13:07 +0800, fei huang wrote:
>
>
> On 5/26/06, Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 10:04 +0800, fei huang wrote:
> > I have seen wierd problems with binary packages.
> Have you
> > tried
>
I am running Blackbox with an rxvt terminal open.
If I su to root I get the following error msgs.
configuration error - unknown item 'FAILLOG_ENAB' (notify
administrator)
configuration error - unknown item 'LASTLOG_ENAB' (notify
administrator)
configuration error - unknown item 'MOTD_FILE' (no
Alex wrote:
Now I'm emerging -e world with -Os. When it is finished, I'll mail you
the results.
Hi,
now I have a -Os-system and it isn't faster. So now I'll emerge the
whole system again, but with -O3.
Alex
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Alexander Skwar wrote:
I'm using ssmtp and thus also have this problem. Is there any
solution, which does NOT require patching portage, like suggested
in the above mentioned bug?
One of those patches is now integrated.
Alexander Skwar
--
FORTRAN is for pipe stress freaks and crystallography w
Hallo.
I'd like portage to use /usr/sbin/sendmail (and thus ssmtp, nbsmtp
or what not) to send out mails, instead of having it try to connect
to some SMTP server.
How can this be done?
Alexander Skwar
--
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.
-- Bru
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
I you
still seeing that exact error message?
Yes, I was - but that's because I did not set PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILFROM.
After now having done so, all is fine.
Alexander Skwar
--
"Imitation is the sincerest form of television."
-- The New Mighty Mouse
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.o
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 10:46 skrev Etaoin Shrdlu:
I seem to remember that this was somehow related to /etc/hosts, look:
# cat /etc/hosts
Changing:
10.0.0.10 mybox mybox.my.domain
to:
10.0.0.10 mybox.my.domain mybox
has just solved this issue for me. :) Than
Arnau Bria wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:28:49 +0100
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
make install symlinks the new kernel to vmlinuz and the previous one
to vmlinuz.old. If grub.conf uses these names, you never need to edit
it when installing a new kernel.
Does it control if my /boot
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:46:24 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Is it required to do a "emerge -e world" when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
"To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is req
Christian Limberg wrote:
just to clarify. Uprading GCC means in this case - emerging gcc-4.1 und
*removing* gcc-3.4?
That's not what I meant - I would have gcc-4.1 and gcc-3.4 installed
in parallel and switch to gcc-4.1 using gcc-config.
So, all the packages compiled with gcc-3.4 will
contin
Hi,
On Fri, 26 May 2006 16:01:14 +0200 Alexander Skwar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course. You don't need to have gcc installed to be able to
> run a *compiled* program.
but one might want to have the libstdc++ and libgcj installed that
came with the compiler for the case that C++/Java progr
On Fri, 26 May 2006 17:12:20 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> but one might want to have the libstdc++ and libgcj installed that
> came with the compiler for the case that C++/Java programs should
> continue to run. So "quickpkg"ing the old GCC is probably not a bad
> idea until revdep-rebuild to
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 12:48:47 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
I'd like portage to use /usr/sbin/sendmail (and thus ssmtp, nbsmtp
or what not) to send out mails, instead of having it try to connect
to some SMTP server.
You can use PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND to call any command with
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/22/06, Anthony E. Caudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, Richard. Those steps did the trick. And the author's
correction fixed the problem also.
Cool. If upstream is going to apply the patch to a future release
that may be some weeks off, you might consider fil
On Friday 26 May 2006 07:48, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Friday 26 May 2006 04:12, Lord Sauron wrote:
> >> sorry for my sin. I didn't know about eix.
> >>
> >> On 5/25/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Friday 26 May 2006 01:00 skrev Lord Saur
On Friday 26 May 2006 08:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > Friday 26 May 2006 10:46 skrev Etaoin Shrdlu:
> >> I seem to remember that this was somehow related to /etc/hosts, look:
> >>
> >> # cat /etc/hosts
> >
> > Changing:
> >> 10.0.0.10 mybox mybox.my.domain
> >
> > t
recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
visiting
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=36939781
xorg shuts down immediatly direct access to the box via the terminal is
imposs
Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> ok, but still less to type ;)
But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
--
Bo Andresen
pgpsWVltWa7BV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 5/25/06, Daniel da Veiga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/25/06, Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:20 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>
> > Anyway, the OP is using genkernel (wether it likes/knows it or not)...
>
> This doesn't look like genkernel:
>
It doesn't
On 5/26/06, leszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but what is RSYNC?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync
basically, portage use rsync to update the information on packages
(ebuilds) in /usr/portage (with emerge --sync)
> If anything, this is a indicator that I need to try and
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:27 +0400, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> >>>recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
> >>>mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
> >>>visiting
> >>>http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=3693978
On 26 May 2006 15:01, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Christian Limberg wrote:
> > just to clarify. Uprading GCC means in this case - emerging gcc-4.1 und
> > *removing* gcc-3.4?
>
> That's not what I meant - I would have gcc-4.1 and gcc-3.4 installed
> in parallel and switch to gcc-4.1 using gcc-config.
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Jim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
JimD
Central FL, USA, Earth, Sol
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 12:48:47 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
I'd like portage to use /usr/sbin/sendmail (and thus ssmtp, nbsmtp
or what not) to send out mails, instead of having it try to connect
to some SMTP server.
You can use PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND
Zac Slade wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 08:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
But I wonder what this DNSDOMAIN setting in /etc/conf.d/domainname is
supposed to do. Because of
It sets the domain in /etc/resolv.conf
No, it doesn't.
# When setting up resolv.conf, what should take precedence?
# If you
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-05-22 16:46]:
> Hello.
> From time to time, I'm looking for a *not* installed package, which
> might provide a certain file. Say, I'd like to know, which packages
> could provide "/etc/foo/bar", how would I do that? Are there any sites
> out there, which pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JimD wrote:
> It is official.
>
> http://picasa.google.com/linux/
>
> It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
It uses wine, in any case. But the interesting things lies in
http://code.google.com - There are
lots of patches they've provided to wine re
JimD a gentiment tapote:
> It is official.
>
> http://picasa.google.com/linux/
>
> It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
>
> Jim
>
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
- Ptitjack -
^
^^^
^
( 0 0 )
I solved it setting X11forwarding to true, so now it goes all right !!!
Thanks !!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/26/06, JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Yay!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
JimD
Central FL, USA, Earth, Sol
Milky Way galaxy, Orion
On 5/26/06, Ptitjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JimD a gentiment tapote:
> It is official.
>
> http://picasa.google.com/linux/
>
> It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
>
> Jim
>
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
Worked just fine for me...
--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+>
>From what I understand it is only accessible from the US.
On Saturday, 27 May 2006 4:10, Lord Sauron wrote:
> On 5/26/06, Ptitjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > JimD a gentiment tapote:
> > > It is official.
> > >
> > > http://picasa.google.com/linux/
> > >
> > > It installs and runs well with G
Lord Sauron a gentiment tapote:
> On 5/26/06, Ptitjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> JimD a gentiment tapote:
>> > It is official.
>> >
>> > http://picasa.google.com/linux/
>> >
>> > It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
>> >
>> > Jim
>> >
>> Hi,
>>
>> 404 Error Not found !
>
> Worked just fine f
On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> > ok, but still less to type ;)
>
> But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
I am using search less, than syncing, so still a win, and it is only
esea ;)
--
gentoo-user@ge
Hi,
On Fri, 26 May 2006 19:40:02 +0200
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zac Slade wrote:
> > On Friday 26 May 2006 08:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> >> But I wonder what this DNSDOMAIN setting in /etc/conf.d/domainname is
> >> supposed to do. Because of
> > It sets the domain in /etc
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:02:25 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
> > you should try the ~x86 version of portage which has many
> > improvements: $ echo "sys-apps/portage ~x86"
> > >> /etc/portage/package.use $ emerge portage
>
> Just a question, but there's got to be a reason why it's still in ~x86.
Yes,
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:30:22 +0930, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
> From what I understand it is only accessible from the US.
Worked here from the UK.
--
Neil Bothwick
"One world, one web, one program" -- Microsoft promotional ad
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer" -- Adolf Hitler
signature
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> ok, but still less to type ;)
But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
I am using search less, than syncing, so still a win, and it is only
e
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:30:22 +0930, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
From what I understand it is only accessible from the US.
Worked here from the UK.
Works also from Germany.
It would be interesting to find out, from where Raymond got his
understanding.
Alexander Skwar
I saw a few reports on /. and digg that it was only accessible from within the
US. It may have been a temporary issue that was resolved or perhaps there was
no issue and it was simply user error.
On Saturday, 27 May 2006 5:14, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 May 2006
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
> I saw a few reports on /. and digg that it was only accessible from within
> the
> US. It may have been a temporary issue that was resolved or perhaps there was
> no issue and it was simply user error.
>
> On Saturday, 27 May 2006 5:14, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> N
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:46:24 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Is it required to do a "emerge -e world" when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
>
"To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is requ
Roman Zilka wrote:
>>Now I remember. It just sort of hit me all at once. I had to re-emerge
>>all this:
>>
>>
>>
>>>1137403163: Started emerge on: Jan 16, 2006 03:19:23
>>>1137403163: *** emerge --verbose gnome-icon-theme
>>>evolution-data-server hicolor-icon-theme miscfiles gconfmm madplay
Ptitjack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 404 Error Not found !
>
> - Ptitjack -
Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
now. However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
http://picasa.google.com.nyud.net:8080/linux/
http://picasa.google.com.nyud.net:8080/linux/faq.h tm
ain and it workedJimD a gentiment tapote:
> Ptitjack wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 404 Error Not found !
>>
>> - Ptitjack -
>>
>
> Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
> now. However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
>
> http://picasa.google.com.nyud.
On 5/26/06, JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ptitjack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 404 Error Not found !
>
> - Ptitjack -
Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
now. However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
http://picasa.google.com.nyud.net:8080/linux/
http://pi
On Fri, 26 May 2006 22:31:18 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
> >
> > "To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
> > that is required is to upgrade GCC and then select the new profile
> > using gcc-config."
>
> Wrong. An "em
On Friday 26 May 2006 21:28, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> >> Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> >> > ok, but still less to type ;)
> >>
> >> But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
visiting
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=36939781
xorg shuts down immediatly direct access to the box via the terminal is
imposs
On Sat, 27 May 2006 00:25:53 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;)
alias es="eix-sync" cuts it down to two, for anyone sad enough to care...
or you could run it from cron.
BTW how many characters have you typed in your emails to make the point
I have seen it seems to need its own version of Wine to work.
I guess it keeps its Wine separated from my own Wine, but I'd like to
ask before hosing my Wine installation...
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/26/06, JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Gentoo on the x86 arch you mean. It's a shame they released a binary
only version, especially one using a Wine wrapper around the original
Windows application.
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> > > > > >recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
> > > > > >mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
> > > > > >visiting
> > > > > >http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&fri
On Saturday 27 May 2006 00:43, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 27 May 2006 00:25:53 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;)
>
> alias es="eix-sync" cuts it down to two, for anyone sad enough to care...
> or you could run it from cron.
>
> BTW how m
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
>
> On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:09:27 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> > # To have a proper FQDN, you need to setup /etc/hosts
> > and /etc/resolv.conf # properly (domain entry in /etc/resolv.conf, and
> > FQDN in /etc/hosts).
>
> What do these files contain?
Holas,
Two days ago I updated the nvidia drivers, so I killed gdm and restarted xdm
to reload the newer modules.
Problem is, it looks like xdm never restarted.
root ~ $ /etc/init.d/xdm status
* status: stopping
root ~ $ /etc/init.d/xdm stop
* ERROR: xdm is already stopping.
rc-status give
Hello,
I'm trying to remove any dependencies on x11 from my headless server. Thanks to
someone's help last week, I learned how to configure libdb to not use java,
which had dragged in the java IDE which dragged in x11.
That worked wonderfully, and I removed x11 and thought I was done.
As a sani
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:04 -0700, Steven Susbauer wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27 May 2006, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
>
> > > > > > >recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
> > > > > > >mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
> > > > > > >visiting
> > > > >
On 5/25/06, znx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This _does_ help. It's mysterious enough that I tested it, and it seems to> work except that it removes "." from any path. This is not quite what I want.Glad it was almost a success ;) Interesting, thats not something I
noticed before, I have never wis
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to remove any dependencies on x11 from my headless server. Thanks
> to
> someone's help last week, I learned how to configure libdb to not use java,
> which had dragged in the java IDE which dragged in x11.
>
> That worked wonde
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to remove any dependencies on x11 from my headless server. Thanks
to
someone's help last week, I learned how to configure libdb to not use java,
which had dragged in the java IDE whi
Etaoin Shrdlu unlimitedmail.org> writes:
> I seem to remember that this was somehow related to /etc/hosts, look:
>
> # cat /etc/hosts
> 10.0.0.10 mybox mybox.my.domain
>
> # hostname -d
> #
> # (modify /etc/hosts)
> # cat /etc/hosts
> 10.0.0.10 mybox.my.domain mybox
>
> # hostname -d
> m
On 5/25/06, John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 25, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:> Somewhere along the line, ssh and ssh2 have gotten conflated,> confused or just> downright broken. I have been running ssh daemon(s) for so long I
> don't even> remember how I set them up. They J
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I should have included that in my original email, of course:
>
> $ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v "^#"
> USE="berkdb innodb"
>
> I have no /usr/portage/package.use
>
> $ grep USE /etc/make.profile/make.defaults
> USE="alsa apm arts avi bitmap-
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but related apps,
such a k3b, that were compiled against the old libraries. Right?
Using "equ
Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have included that in my original email, of course:
$ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v "^#"
USE="berkdb innodb"
I have no /usr/portage/package.use
$ grep USE /etc/make.profile/make.defaults
USE="alsa apm arts
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> Steven Susbauer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > >I should have included that in my original email, of course:
> > >
> > >$ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v "^#"
> > >USE="berkdb innodb"
> > >
> > >I have n
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but related apps,
such a k3b, that were compiled against the old libra
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have included that in my original email, of course:
$ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v "^#"
USE="berkdb innodb"
I have no /usr/portage/package.use
$ grep USE /etc/make.profile/make.def
On 5/26/06, Kevin O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/25/06, John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On May 25, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:> Somewhere along the line, ssh and ssh2 have gotten conflated,> confused or just> downright broken. I have been running ssh daemon(s) for so
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
> it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
> but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but related apps,
> such a k3b, that
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> > I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
> > it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
> > but I think I will then have t
JimD wrote:
Ptitjack wrote:
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
- Ptitjack -
Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
now.
Wrong. How do you get this idea?
However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
Or by going directly to http://picasa.google.com/linux/
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 22:31:18 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
>
> "To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
> that is required is to upgrade GCC and then select the new profile
> using gcc-config."
Wro
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but relate
On 5/26/06, Anthony E. Caudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first.
You don't need to unmerge 3.4 _first_. You can do it after you have
merged 3.5, although even then it is
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 21:28, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>> Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
>> > ok, but still less to type ;)
>>
>> But esearch is more than twice
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
