My (parallel port laser) printer started spewing garbage (i.e. pcl data as
text - a few characters per sheet) as a result, I think, of a loose cable.
Trouble is I can't stop it. I cleared the print jobs. Even stopped cups. Tried
to rmmod parport_pc and lp, but was refused. Tried pressing the sto
On 16 February 2006 09:56, Robert Persson wrote:
> My (parallel port laser) printer started spewing garbage (i.e. pcl data as
> text - a few characters per sheet) as a result, I think, of a loose cable.
>
> Trouble is I can't stop it. I cleared the print jobs. Even stopped cups.
> Tried to rmmod pa
On Thursday 16 February 2006 00:18 Uwe Thiem was like:
> > I'm about to reboot, hoping that that will do the trick. But surely
> > there's a way to stop the diarrhoea without rebooting, isn't there?
>
> Don't, it won't help. Do a "ps ax | less" and try to find everything
> remotely related to print
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 18:20, Arnau Bria Ramírez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed nagios on my gentoo box and after some time of
> configuration I pointed my web-browser to localhost/nagios and found
> Error: Could not open CGI config file '/etc/nagios/cgi.cfg' for
> reading! error message.
>
El Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:03:12 +0100
Herman Grootaers dijo:
> You just tested the configuration of nagios. To start it run either the
> startscript in /etc/init.d, or if it does not exists with the same
> command replacing the -v with -d. That should start nagios, and start
> also the output on
Hello,
I'm trying to install Centos as guest on Gentoo Vserver. I'm folowing this
Howto: http://linux-vserver.org/CentOS_HowTo ant this is result:
vlan10-virtual / # vserver min-centos4 build -m yum --hostname domain.com
--interface domain=eth0:192.168.0.136/24 --initstyle sysv --context 500
-
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:20:49 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't have currently syslog-ng running, but I think I remember that
> > similar configuration was in /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf (maybe
> > commented out?)
>
> Yes, it was commented out as the default setting is to se
At times you also have to go to the cups cache directory and delete the
print job there as well, as on restart it stats the printjob from the
beginning again. They really need to fix this ...
BillK
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 01:00 -0800, Robert Persson wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 00:18 Uwe
I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space I should use for /.
My machine is Pentium4, 1GB RAM, 200 GB HD ATA
It's a desktop machine with Gentoo as the only and exclusive OS.
Will run KDE. Amarok, OpenOffice, firefox
Thanx!
40 GB is enough, these are my stats with / partition of 35GB / 200GB
Filesystemblocchi di 1K Usati Disponib. Uso% Montato su
*
/dev/sdb1 34185192 18272204 15912988 54% /
***
IMHO you could just use the rest of the disk (after the /boot [hda1]
and swap [hda2]), but if you intend to get a /home (or anything), I
usually use 10GB for / just in case (still at 50%, but you never
know). I got two 40GB disks however, if I were you (and I'm not, so,
you can just disconsider wha
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:19:21 +0100, Izar Ilun wrote:
> I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc
> space I should use for /.
That depends on what you are going to put on it. Will /usr or /var be on
it? They use most of the space. 10GB will be plenty. I have / or a 300MB
p
I say that, It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)On 2/16/06, Ibai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It'll be just:
- /boot
- swap
- /home
- / (all the rest)On 2/16/06, Neil Bothwick <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:19:21 +0100, Izar Ilun wrote:> I'm installing Gent
Izar Ilun wrote:
> I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space
> I should use for /.
512 MB.
The rest should go to filesystems for /var, /usr,
/opt and /home. And maybe also additional filesystems
for /usr/src and all that Gentoo stuff.
Alexander Skwar
--
BOFH Excus
Izar Ilun wrote:
> I say that, It'll be just:
> - /boot
> - swap
> - /home
> - / (all the rest)
That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
and / (of course). This way you're more flexible
and also a bit safer (not such a high risk of r
Ernie Schroder wrote:
I am just starting to play with php and mysql. I've got mysql working and can
log into root accounts using a password. php scripts work on
http://localhost. For example, http://localhost/php/index.php in a browser
shows a whole lot of info re php, mysql and apache2. Howev
On Thursday 16 February 2006 12:26, Arnau Bria Ramírez wrote:
> El Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:03:12 +0100
>
> Herman Grootaers dijo:
> > You just tested the configuration of nagios. To start it run either
> > the startscript in /etc/init.d, or if it does not exists with the
> > same command replacing the
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:06:12 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
> filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
> and / (of course). This way you're more flexible
> and also a bit safer (not such a high risk of running
> out of space on /).
> > I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space
> > I should use for /.
>
> 512 MB.
>
> The rest should go to filesystems for /var, /usr,
> /opt and /home. And maybe also additional filesystems
> fo
This is (part) what i have mount
i`ve instales stuff for workstatio
This problem was solved already, I really commited a huge compilatiom mistake.
So, I decided using genkernl to help. But this is another thread ...
2006/2/15, Emmanuel Durin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The make module_install command installs the modules into
> /lib/modules/2.x.xx/. Search for your fil
Le mercredi 15 février 2006 à 04:42 -0800, Mark Knecht a écrit :
> OK, good info - but what can I remove? Or more important how can I
> find what's talking up too much space.
I know you've already solved that problem, but I think the following
might be interesting.
I found xdiskusage to be a ve
On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Izar Ilun wrote:
> > I say that, It'll be just:
> > - /boot
> > - swap
> > - /home
> > - / (all the rest)
>
> That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
> filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
> and / (of course).
On Thursday 16 February 2006 13:19, Izar Ilun wrote:
> I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space I
> should use for /.
>
> My machine is Pentium4, 1GB RAM, 200 GB HD ATA
>
> It's a desktop machine with Gentoo as the only and exclusive OS.
>
> Will run KDE. Amarok, Ope
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > I'm installing Gentoo and I'd like you to suggest me how much disc space
>> > I should use for /.
>>
>> 512 MB.
>>
>> The rest should go to filesystems for /var, /usr,
>> /opt and /home. And maybe also additional filesystems
>> fo
>
> This is (part) what i have moun
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To put everything on its own partition was good, when harddisks were
> 2gb-10gb big. But today it is just a waste of space and time.
IMHO there still might be advantages to using more partitions,
for example security (you can mount /boot /tmp /
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I say that, It'll be just:
> > - /boot
> > - swap
> > - /home
> > - / (all the rest)
>
> That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
> filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
> and / (of course).
Moreover I have created separat
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Izar Ilun wrote:
>> > I say that, It'll be just:
>> > - /boot
>> > - swap
>> > - /home
>> > - / (all the rest)
>>
>> That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
>> filesystems for /boot, swap, /hom
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:06:12 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
>> That's not advisable. I'd strongly suggest to create
>> filesystems for /boot, swap, /home, /opt, /usr, /var
>> and / (of course). This way you're more flexible
>> and also a bit safer (not such a high risk of r
Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
> life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
> still do the old style partitioning.
>
> For example, in your setup, how do you make /var larger, if need
> be?
>
> With LVM, it would just be a matter of "lvresize
On 2/16/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on their own partition. Additionally, the more partitions, the more useless
> head movement, the slower data transfer the earlier the harddisk dies.
I disagree. Sensible partitioning can _reduce_ head movement and
improve performance.
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
> life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
> still do the old style partitioning.
Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
control over physical placement of your partitions.
The main reason for putting /var, /tmp, and portage on their own partitions
is to minimize fragmentation on /, especially with a source distro like
Gentoo. And yes, Linux does fragment and does require attention, especially
with reiserfs, where the only solution is to dump/format/restore.
On T
On 2/16/06 9:04 AM, "Martin Eisenhardt"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
>> life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
>> still do the old style partitioning.
>>
>> For example, in your setup, how do you make /
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 February 2006 10:02
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with GRUB in the
> installation of Gentoo
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:25:52 +0100, Bo Andresen wrote:
>
>
On Thursday February 16 2006 16:15, John Jolet wrote:
> >
> > Having said that, I would like to suggest that instead of using LVM, the
> > top-poster might be better off by using EVMS
> > (http://evms.sourceforge.net) since EVMS sports different UIs for all
> > kinds of users (CLI, ncurses, X) and
On Thursday February 16 2006 16:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
> > life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
> > still do the old style partitioning.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
>> life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
>> still do the old style partitioning.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
> control over
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> you'll never fill up root, so making a lot of partitions is just wasted space.
No, it's not wasted space. Well, okay, not much wasted space.
> And yes, I once put all and everything on its own partition.
> I learnt the hard way, that this does not solve problems, i
On Thursday 16 February 2006 16:14, Robert Crawford wrote:
> The main reason for putting /var, /tmp, and portage on their own
> partitions is to minimize fragmentation on /, especially with a source
> distro like Gentoo. And yes, Linux does fragment and does require
> attention, especially with re
On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> Izar Ilun wrote:
> >> > I say that, It'll be just:
> >> > - /boot
> >> > - swap
> >> > - /home
> >> > - / (all the rest)
> >>
> >> That's not
El Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:37:10 +0100
Herman Grootaers dijo:
>
> So Nagios is started correctly.
Sure, and it send emails correctly. (it found my smtp server down during a
reboot)
> Now another question: is apache running and if so is there an entry in
> the apache-configuration for the nagios we
On 2/16/06, Frédéric Grosshans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 15 février 2006 à 04:42 -0800, Mark Knecht a écrit :
>
> > OK, good info - but what can I remove? Or more important how can I
> > find what's talking up too much space.
>
> I know you've already solved that problem, but I think
On Thursday 16 February 2006 16:02, Richard Fish wrote:
> Having / on its own partition can result in a similar improvement,
> because the drive doesn't have to seek over your files in /home or
> /opt to get to something in /lib.
it still has to move at the beginning of the partition, look up, whe
On 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
> control over physical placement of your partitions. Right?
While true in theory, in practice the first LV you create is created
at the lowest numbered PV extents, which correspond to
On Thursday February 16 2006 16:30, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes
> >> life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people
> >> still do the old style partitioning.
> >
> > C
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:19:36 -, Michael Kintzios wrote:
> > make install does exactly the same, and sets up the vmlinuz and
> > vmlinuz.old symlinks to point to your new and previous kernel
> > respectively, so you don't need to edit grub.conf.
>
> Hmm, it doesn't on my two boxen. :-( I do
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:39:02 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > But far more chance of running out of space on /usr, /var or /opt
> > while
>
> Not really. And even if so - who cares? Make the
> fs larger, and you're set. Also, if those fs
> run out of space, it's not a DoS.
No, but it means you
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
>> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> >> Izar Ilun wrote:
>> >> > I say that, It'll be just:
>> >> > - /boot
>> >> > - swap
>> >> > - /home
>> >> >
Martin Eisenhardt wrote:
> On Thursday February 16 2006 16:30, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
>> > control over physical placement of your partitions. Right?
>>
>> Right.
>>
>
> No, wrong, please see my other message.
> > It also looks like the power supply is not regulating very well?
> > Can I believe these voltages?
> no
> but you can never believe the voltages.
> The absolut numbers are irrelevant.
> What is important: are there any fluctuations? Does the voltages change under
> load?
> if yes, a new PSU
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:50:01 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > I found xdiskusage to be a very practical tool to findout where space
> > is wasted on a disk. It's basically a tool giving a graphical output
> > to du, showing how the space is shared by directory and
> > subdirectories (and files with t
Moving my thread over to the proper list... first...
Now then - thanks to everyone on the list for your help. I've had barely
any sleep lately, so I must apologize first, for putting the original
thread onto the security mailing list by mistake.
For anyone who's wondering - I have an AMD64 box, w
Great !!
Thx,
Rafael Fernández López.
pgpCt7WgJJcoM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the day".
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
(Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that route, but
I would like to keep as much as possible in portage
I just upgraded to BIND 9.3.2 and now when I try:
/etc/init.d/named start
it says:
* WARNING: "named" has already been started.
I used to have this problem before, so I checked my notes and saw this is what
I did to fix it:
oberon log # mkdir /var/run/named
oberon log # chmod 700 /var/run/nam
Ok, so with some quick tips from the nice peoples here in the list, I
was almost instantly able to track down the culprit to my hard draive
whackiness. It's my ATI IDE controller:
00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc Standard Dual Channel PCI
IDE Controller ATI
In the kernel, I found:
Dev
On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the day".
>
> But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
> (Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that rou
Chris Bare wrote:
> I just upgraded to BIND 9.3.2 and now when I try:
>
> /etc/init.d/named start
>
> it says:
>
> * WARNING: "named" has already been started.
Kill all named processes:
killall named
Tell the init script that you have done so:
/etc/init.d/named zap
Start named:
/et
Martin Eisenhardt wrote:
>>Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have
>>control over physical placement of your partitions. Right?
>
> No, wrong, I am sorry :-D
>
> You might let LVM choose where to put the extends for a newly created logical
> volume, but you might also tell LVM wh
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:39:02 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
>> > But far more chance of running out of space on /usr, /var or /opt
>> > while
>>
>> Not really. And even if so - who cares? Make the
>> fs larger, and you're set. Also, if those fs
>> run out of space, it's no
Alexander Skwar wrote:
I can't. But that's just not needed. Make the filesystems
as large as they *now* need to be. If more space is required,
extending is a matter of a few seconds.
I agree with that.
80GB drive, lvm up 50GB of it, and then you can grow whatever as needed.
It's not like you
Jarry wrote:
> But even if it is so, if you resize partition by lvm, this advantage
> could be lost. And if it even is possible to keep some partition
> continuous, than resizing partition in lvm would be very long process:
> if I resize 1st partition (the fastest, on the most outer cylinders)
> a
Rumen Yotov wrote:
> Now run: "gcc-config 5" and check again with gcc-config -l that vanilla
> is your default gcc profile.
>
> Next try re-emerging GCC-3.4.4.
I tried. Changed to vanilla, verified, started re-emerging gcc, but it
failed without saying anything (frozen, after 4 hours of nothing-
Thanks all for your help!Turns out that Kasablanca will work for me, gftp for some reason or another crashes, but Konqueror still can't work correctly; guess is it has something to do with that bug.
On 2/16/06, Harm Geerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 02:05, Ryan Holt wro
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:27, James wrote:
> > > It also looks like the power supply is not regulating very well?
> > > Can I believe these voltages?
> >
> > no
> > but you can never believe the voltages.
> > The absolut numbers are irrelevant.
> > What is important: are there any fluctuation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the day".
>
> But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
> (Obviously I could download it from ker
quoth the Jeff:
>
> See here:
>
> hdparm -tT /dev/hda
>
> /dev/hda:
> Timing cached reads: 3016 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1507.91 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads:4 MB in 3.68 seconds = 1.09 MB/sec
>
> Horribly slow! This machine should be blazing fast, with the 7200 rpm
> 200 GB hard dri
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 19:25 +0100, Jarry wrote:
> Rumen Yotov wrote:
>
> > Now run: "gcc-config 5" and check again with gcc-config -l that vanilla
> > is your default gcc profile.
> >
> > Next try re-emerging GCC-3.4.4.
>
> I tried. Changed to vanilla, verified, started re-emerging gcc, but it
>
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:18, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> >> Izar Ilun wrote:
> >> >> > I say that,
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:32, Jeff wrote:
> Moving my thread over to the proper list... first...
>
> Now then - thanks to everyone on the list for your help. I've had barely
> any sleep lately, so I must apologize first, for putting the original
> thread onto the security mailing list by mist
is there a way to tell what packages are required by what? for
instance i have a package that is blocking another package when i do
an emerge, is there a way to tell if the package that is blocking the
other is actually needed by any other package on the system before i
unmerge it?
thanks
Nick
is this bad or is it ok to ignore? when ever i start spamd it gives me
this error, but it does say OK and starts the process anyway, is there
something wrong with perl? or should i just ignore this if it works
(which is to be determined, im still installing/setting it up)
# /etc/init.d/spamd start
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
> > >Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
> > >I mean, "u" for "update"?
>
> emerge -uav gentoo-sources
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
>
> Total size of downloads: 0 kB
>
usualy portatge tells you what is blocking what
anyway try emerge -av it will give you an idea of what you need
On 2/16/06, Nick Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a way to tell what packages are required by what? for
> instance i have a package that is blocking another package when i do
On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
> > > >Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
> > > >I mean, "u" for "update"?
> >
> > emerge -uav gentoo-sources
> >
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Smith wrote:
>is there a way to tell what packages are required by what? for
>instance i have a package that is blocking another package when i do
>an emerge, is there a way to tell if the package that is blocking the
>other is actually needed by
gentuxx gmail.com> writes:
>
> emerge -uav gentoo-sources
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
>
> Total size of downloads: 0 kB
>
> Nothing to merge; do you want me to auto-clean packages? [Yes/No] n
when was the last time you enter
gentuxx schreef:
> Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>
>>> On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>
>>> Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the
>>> day".
>>>
>>> But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
>>> (Obviously I could download it from kernel.
On 2/16/06, Ghaith Hachem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> usualy portatge tells you what is blocking what
> anyway try emerge -av it will give you an idea of what you need
>
right, but i want to know that the package im going to remove because
its blocking something else isnt needed by another package
On 2/16/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 16:02, Richard Fish wrote:
>
> > Having / on its own partition can result in a similar improvement,
> > because the drive doesn't have to seek over your files in /home or
> > /opt to get to something in /lib
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:18, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
>> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> >> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 14:06, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> >> >> Iz
* On Feb 16 14:03, Nick Smith (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
> # /etc/init.d/spamd start
> * Starting spamd...
> [18773] error: persistent_udp: no such method at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
> 99 [ ok ]
I h
On 2/16/06, Nick Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Ghaith Hachem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > usualy portatge tells you what is blocking what
> > anyway try emerge -av it will give you an idea of what you need
> >
> right, but i want to know that the package im going to remove becaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holly Bostick wrote:
>gentuxx schreef:
>
>>Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>>
On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the
day".
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my ker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
james wrote:
>gentuxx gmail.com> writes:
>
>>emerge -uav gentoo-sources
>>
>>These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>>
>>Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>
>>Total size of downloads: 0 kB
>>
>>Nothing to merge; do you want me to auto-
Hi list,
i've followed this how http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash to have
a framebuffer splash under gentoo. I've added "splash" to the boot
runlevel; however the framebuffer images start only in the default
runlevel.
# rc-status boot
..
..
splash
..
..
This is the GRUB entries:
title=Gen
Rumen Yotov wrote:
> Have you compiled anything after compiling GCC with 'hardened'? (genlop)
Negative, only gcc, then emerge failed trying to compile 2nd package -
glibc-2.3.5-r2. I tried to go back (removed those hardened-flags), and
could not compile gcc-3.4.4
> Try with MAKEOPTS="-j1" in /et
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Andresen wrote:
>On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
>
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
I mean, "u" for "update"?
>>
>>emerge -uav gentoo-sources
>>
>>These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>>
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
> > that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and
> > `emerge -av gentoo-sources`. And it wants to rebuild my 2.6.13-r3
>
> Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:46:57 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > If partition A
> > runs out of space while partition B has plenty,
>
> Then you made B too large, which is the main cause of the problem.
Of course, but if your needs change, that's the situation you find
yourself in, as I did recen
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:40:49 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> "needed" - What's "needed", anyway?
/ and swap, nothing else :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Crayons can take you more places than starships. * Guinan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
>> > > >Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
>> > > >I mean, "u" for "update"?
>> >
>> > emerge -uav gentoo-sources
>> >
>> > These are the packages that
On Thursday 16 February 2006 21:11, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:46:57 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > > If partition A
> > > runs out of space while partition B has plenty,
> >
> > Then you made B too large, which is the main cause of the problem.
>
> Of course, but if your need
On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:40, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:18, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 15:45, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> >> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> >> >> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>
>> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
>>
>>>that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and
>>>`emerge -av gentoo-sources`. An
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 February 2006 16:10
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with GRUB in the
> installation of Gentoo
>
> > > make install does exactly the same, and sets up the vmlinuz
On 2/16/06 11:05 AM, "Michael Kintzios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 16 February 2006 16:10
>> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with GRUB in the
>> installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mick wrote:
>Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>
>>On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
>>>
>>Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
>>I mean, "u" for "update"?
e
On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> >
> >> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
> >>
> >>>that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So
On Thursday 16 February 2006 17:21, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> > You *can* tell LVM where to put LVs but you do not *have* to.
>
> But how do you actually do that? Or are you talking about
> the "allocation policy"? Like "--contiguous y"?
>
Well, first of all, you can pass lvcreate a list of physi
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
