Uwe Thormann wrote:
unsubscribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Where "unsubscribe" is a 12-reply thread.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> here too it keeps failing at different places all the time.
This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
the other partition, and did the 'ebuild install' again: it worked
flawlessly.
On 2006-02-06 00:47:03 +0100 (Mon, Feb), Holly Bostick wrote:
> Daniel Pielmeier schreef:
> > Thank you,
> >
> > in one portage overlay i use there are three ebuilds
> >
>
> > and they are all marked ~x86.
>
> Ebuilds from overlay are always ~arch, afaik. Overlays are not
> considered "stable"
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 01:02 +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > here too it keeps failing at different places all the time.
>
> This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
>
> On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
> the ot
Mariusz Pękala schreef:
>
> Portage overlays are our 'private' portage trees, and they are in no
> thing 'worse' than 'official' ebuilds.
You clearly haven't seen, or even imagined, some of my initial attempts
at ebuild writing, which naturally resided in my overlay tree.
:-)
Holly
--
gentoo-u
I'm not sure where to log this complaint, its not a real bug.
I've had about 6 or 7 emerges like emerge -v -u -D world break in the
middle somewhere because emacs has been called to byte compile or
whatever, however whoever is writing this stuff is calling emacs
WITHOUT taking the normal precation
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:47, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> I have one (CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer")
> Normal except ~x86 (all testing) system - coreutils-5.93: 2.1M.
> Putting the binary here: ftp://ftp.qrypto.org (my router).
> As emerge doesn't work (assume) put it in / (root di
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:02, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
>
> On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
> the other partition, and did the 'ebuild install' again: it worked
> flawlessly. ... This won't help you now
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:54, Martin Ullrich wrote:
> I compiled coreutils 5.2.1-r7 with your CFLAGS and only the NLS
> USE-flag. Assuming you have gcc-3.4 installed it should work.
>
> http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
>
> Just boot from a live-cd (e.g. the gentoo instal
On Sunday 05 February 2006 21:40, Rafael Fernández López wrote:
> Jarry wrote:
> There are lots of people unsubscribing and subscribing, only a few ones
> write here for unsubscribing, we cannot do anything against that.
Would it not be possible to filter out mails that contain no subject field?
Hi
I'm running stable primarily but recently I decided to go to Portage 2.1.
After doing that I am having problems with eix. eix considers all ebuild hard
masked. It prints SRC_URI in the hopepage field and it prints dependencies in
the description field. I have posted som info below that I hop
After the essentially forced upgrade, I'm now running kernel
2.6.15-gentoo-r1 (udev) from 2.6.9 (devfs).
I have a Senao Engenius 200 mW PCMCIA card in a PCMCIA/PCI adapter in my
server -- this card is then the wireless AP for my network.
I can't get my wlan0 to show up like it used to, therefore
I have a scsi tape library and a backup program that creates datasets of tar
files on the tapes. I gather each dataset is a tar file. I would like to be
able to access each of these tar files. At this point I can tar
-tvf /dev/tape0 and see the file that contains the tape label. But I can't
So after dicking with this some more, I'm noticing this:
daevid ~ # ls /sys/class/net/
eth0 eth1 lo
shouldn't there be something else in there for my wifi card?
And would it show up here or not?
> -Original Message-
> From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, Fe
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 04:32:16AM +0100, Bo Andresen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm running stable primarily but recently I decided to go to Portage
> 2.1. After doing that I am having problems with eix. eix considers
> all ebuild hard masked. It prints SRC_URI in the hopepage field and
> it prints depende
On 2/5/06, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So after dicking with this some more, I'm noticing this:
>
> daevid ~ # ls /sys/class/net/
> eth0 eth1 lo
>
> shouldn't there be something else in there for my wifi card?
>
> And would it show up here or not?
Yes, it would. Looks like whate
On 2/5/06, Brett I. Holcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a scsi tape library and a backup program that creates datasets of tar
> files on the tapes. I gather each dataset is a tar file. I would like to be
> able to access each of these tar files. At this point I can tar
> -tvf /dev/tape0
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 10:08 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 2/5/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All this was here ones again :(
>
> I posted this to your other thread, but you either didn't see it or
> didn't respond.
>
> Try "cat /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug". In your case, it should say
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:53 +1300, Bogo Mipps wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:47, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> > I have one (CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer")
> > Normal except ~x86 (all testing) system - coreutils-5.93: 2.1M.
> > Putting the binary here: ftp://ftp.qrypto.org (my ro
On 6 Feb 2006, at 02:10, Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm not sure where to log this complaint, its not a real bug.
I've had about 6 or 7 emerges like emerge -v -u -D world break in the
middle somewhere because emacs has been called to byte compile or
whatever, however whoever is writing this stuff is
Your card is a 802.11b Prism card, right? The mention of orinoco &
prism54 in your `dmesg` is confusing me.
Do you have hotplug / coldplug installed? I think you may need to
install one of these to deal with PCMCIA (well, probably Cardbus,
really) cards.
I don't use hostapd - have you tri
On Monday 06 February 2006 03:10, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Where do I need to take this complaint?
Perhaps gentoodev mailing list is the right place for this topic.
I suggest to provide some real life example and pointers to manpage/URLs
supporting your claims.
I know for sure a developer belonging
On 2/5/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> frankies ~ # #with stick
> frankies ~ #
> frankies ~ # ls /dev/ds*
> ls: /dev/ds*: No such file or directory
Oh, and you typo'd here...
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Okay, I think I figured out what they are doing. They have a bunch of files
for the labels. If I move forward using asf n where n is a number from 1-n I
can walk through the label files. They take two files/label file so I go
from 1 to 3 to 5
How do I get to this file to untar it? What
On 2/5/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, this is set. I'd assume, if my devices are managed by UDEV than all
> of them are managed by UDEV. Aren't they?
>
> I've had a short look into 50-udev.rules. The only entries for USB are
> these.
This is normal. The /dev/sd* devices are not USB
GNOME 2.12 do this for you, if you put yourself in the plugdev group.
It just works.
Canek
On 2/5/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:09:43 -0500, James Colby wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if anybody knew of a package or a method that I could
> > use to detect when
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:03:36 +0100
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2006 21:43, Nick Rout wrote:
> > An ironic comment from someone whose sig is longer than their message!
> >
>
> an ironic statement from someone who top posts!
>
> ;)
> --
> gentoo-user@
On Monday 06 February 2006 05:12, Grzegorz Kubiak wrote:
> Portage 2.1 uses a new caching method, so you should inform eix
> about this by adding line:
> PORTDIR_CACHE_METHOD="backport"
> to /etc/eixrc
That worked. :) Thank you very much.
/Bo
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
