On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 19:56 +, C. Beamer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alex Bennee wrote:
>
> >Although its enabled evolution never picks up any mis-spelled words. I
> >suspect its something to do with the fact no dictionaries are selectable
> >in the preferences dialog.
> >
> >I have aspell-en installed
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:28:26 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote:
> > As I understand it, the first time you recompile new toolchain with
> > your old toolchain, and then the 2nd time you're recompiling the
> > toolchain with the new toolchain, with the idea that the new toolchain
> > will compile/assemb
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:33:25 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Hogwash. What's so hard about it, as opposed to any other Linux distro,
> once you get past the install issue?
Try plugging in a wireless NIC. It's not hard to set on up manually when
you know what you are doing, but other distros will ta
Alexander Skwar schreef:
> Holly Bostick schrieb:
>
>> However, other than pointing this out by the simple expedient of
>> confusing everyone further, Alexander's reply was less than
>> helpful, since it neither pointed out why the answer given was
>> presumably not correct,
>
>
> Uhm. Yes, I d
Holly Bostick wrote:
> Well, if someone asks how to create a signature, and someone else
> answers how to provide a key pair, clearly someone is confused as to the
> fact that a signature is not a key pair. Saying so explicitly (i.e.,
> "this will generate a key pair, not a signature, and they are
>
> Gentoo has to be harder to use than other distros, you can't have full
> control over the system and still have it do things automatically for
> you.
>
I could not of said it any better.
And of the distros I have used Gentoo is the best, although not my
first. And I would not recommend it to
Hi,
I wrote a short script for simple text file processing in bash
(using "<" for input redirection and "read"). I know, there are
probably better tools to do it, but the only thing I can rely on
being installed on target comp is really bash and nothing more
(no bc, sed, awk, etc.) so I must use o
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:40:02 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Myself, I don't consider that either a stage 1 or stage 3 leaves me with
> more than a minimally functional system after the initial install, but a
> stage 3 leaves me with a *higher functioning* minimal install than a
> stage 1 does.
A s
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 07:06:01 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > I've just completed a stage3 install, and I'd like to change the CHOST
> > from "i386-pc-linux-gnu" to "i586-pc-linux-gnu".
>
> Why? What do you expect to gain?
A broken system :(
After changing CHOST you must run fix_libtool_files.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:35:54 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> In other words after kde.org (or any other software writer) releases a
> new version, it takes some time for the gentoo devs to make sure it is
> working ok before they release it on the masses of gentoo users who rely
> on the devs to keep th
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Richard Fish wrote:
>
> So if it really is partitioned, we'll have to figure out why the
> kernel is not seeing your partition table. I would be interested to
> see the output of 'fdisk -l /dev/sda' with the stick inserted.
>
No /dev/sda. But there exists /dev/plextor_memst
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:42:30 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> I am looking for a 2.5in HD enclosure, with USB 2. SD Card reader is a
> bonus, as is video / audio playback from the device itself.
>
> I'm leaning toward this one from vosonic, that can even view video on
> its display http://www.voson
Hi, i have some computers when I try to emerge the kde, or any package of it, i receice this message:
Calculating dependencies \emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r3".
I just can´t find thi damn lib. how to fix this ??-- __Atenciosamente,Thia
On Tuesday 22 Nov 2005 4:23 am, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Just because you have a lot of packages installed that have the "pam" USE
> flag doesn't mean that much-- is the flag actually enabled for those
> packages?
>
> If so, and your system is not having any issues, I wouldn't necessarily
> become hy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holly Bostick wrote:
> Well, if someone asks how to create a signature, and someone else
> answers how to provide a key pair, clearly someone is confused as to the
> fact that a signature is not a key pair.
No, actually I'm not confused as to the diff
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:08:40 -0500 Matthew Cline
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 11/21/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > You can change
| > everything after a stage 3 install, although you have to be careful
| > when changing CHOST.
|
| I've just completed a stage3 install, and I'd
On Monday 21 Nov 2005 2:17 pm, pat wrote:
> Well, the ACPI works, and it looks like everything works. I'm googling why
> this happen (an explanation), but without success :-\ I'm just curious,
> that's all.
>
This is what I could find
"It implies the BIOS handover failed and then we get an IRQ mess
On 11/22/05, Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Gentoo has to be harder to use than other distros, you can't have full
> > control over the system and still have it do things automatically for
> > you.
> >
Exactly, the computer can do amazing things, but in order to keep it
clean, specific a
Hi folks,
portage says something is wrong with my world file. "emaint --check world"
produces this output:
'app-office/ooodi' has no ebuilds available
What am I to do?
Uwe
--
Unix is sexy:
who | grep -i blonde | date
cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger
mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount
sleep
--
On Tuesday 22 November 200>
> portage says something is wrong with my world file. "emaint --check world"
> produces this output:
> 'app-office/ooodi' has no ebuilds available
>
> What am I to do?
My first reaction would be to go to the /usr/portage/app-office en to remove
or rename the ooodi dir
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:20:07 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> portage says something is wrong with my world file. "emaint --check
> world" produces this output:
> 'app-office/ooodi' has no ebuilds available
I means pretty much what it says. you have a package installed for which
there is
On 11/22/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first command won't do anything, -D doesn't take account of of USE or
> CFLAG changes.
It will update gcc or any dependancies of gcc to the current version.
Unless one of those things have been updated, there is no need to
build anything
On 22 November 2005 17:37, Gerhard Hoogterp wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 November 200>
>
> > portage says something is wrong with my world file. "emaint --check
> > world" produces this output:
> > 'app-office/ooodi' has no ebuilds available
> >
> > What am I to do?
>
> My first reaction would be to go t
Neil Bothwick wrote:
Try plugging in a wireless NIC. It's not hard to set on up manually when
you know what you are doing, but other distros will take care of this
automatically.
Perhaps if you're using WEP it's easier on a binary distro, but if
you're using WPA-PSK it's a lot easier on Gentoo
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 09:17 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:28:26 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote:
>
> > > As I understand it, the first time you recompile new toolchain with
> > > your old toolchain, and then the 2nd time you're recompiling the
> > > toolchain with the new toolc
OK I haven't updated this box in 10 months and finally decided to spend some
time on maintainance. I successfully ran emerge -u system last night and have
updated my profile and gotten Xorg running.
Now it's time to move on to "world" and kdelibs-3.4.2-r1 fails like so. I'm
way rusty at this and
> The last top posting/html thread was 3 weeks ago... so yes it's time
> for another "Keep Gentoo leet" thread. Gentoo isn't about pain, it's
> about getting work done. Anything, and I mean *anything*, that allows me
> to spend less time working and more time having a life is a good thing.
>
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 14:18, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> OK I haven't updated this box in 10 months and finally decided to
> spend some time on maintainance. I successfully ran emerge -u system
> last night and have updated my profile and gotten Xorg running.
> Now it's time to move on to "world"
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Therefore we can deduce that anyone who wants a harder install is a
hobbyist, dilettante, and a dabbler.
no, I want an installation, that filters out everybody too dumb to read the
fucking manual.
Or the FAQ? Where it's described how to do a stage1/2 equivalent i
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 13:21, Thiago Lüttig wrote:
> Hi, i have some computers when I try to emerge the kde, or any
> package of it, i receice this message:
> Calculating dependencies \
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r3".
> I just can´t find thi damn lib. how t
eix xorg-x11 tells me that the following are available:
* x11-base/xorg-x11
Available versions: 6.8.2-r4 ~6.8.2-r6 [M]6.8.99.15-r4 [M]
7.0.0_rc1
Which of these are the new modularised ones? does it start with 6.8.99
or with the 7.0.x series?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Nick Rout wrote:
Which of these are the new modularised ones? does it start with 6.8.99
or with the 7.0.x series?
Looking at the ebuild I'd say 7.0.0_rc1.
--
Naga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Ernie Schroder wrote:
OK I haven't updated this box in 10 months and finally decided to spend some
time on maintainance. I successfully ran emerge -u system last night and have
updated my profile and gotten Xorg running.
Now it's time to move on to "world" and kdelibs-3.4.2-r1 fails like so. I'm
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
no, I want an installation, that filters out everybody too dumb to read the
fucking manual.
I understand where you are coming from, however, without people willing
to push the envelope and try new things, nothing will innovated will
happen. While being an expert
On 11/22/05, Manuel McLure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> /usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/files/fix_libtool_files.sh 3.3.4
Just a note...that path should be /sbin/fix_libtool_files.sh. It may
well exist in the portage tree, but there is no guarantee that it will
be executable. For on my syste
x11-base/xorg-server
Catalin
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 11/22/05, Nagatoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> >>Therefore we can deduce that anyone who wants a harder install is a
> >>hobbyist, dilettante, and a dabbler.
> >
> > no, I want an installation, that filters out everybody too dumb to read the
> > fucking manual.
>
Richard Fish wrote:
On 11/22/05, Manuel McLure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/files/fix_libtool_files.sh 3.3.4
Just a note...that path should be /sbin/fix_libtool_files.sh. It may
well exist in the portage tree, but there is no guarantee that it will
be executa
On 11/19/05, Bill Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21:42 Fri 18 Nov , Matthias Bethke wrote:
> > I just noticed the new Gentoo kernel 2.6.14-r2 includes support for both
> > the generic 802.11 stack and the Intel IPW2200 driver. I've been using
> > the separate ebuilds for these two so f
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
no, I want an installation, that filters out everybody too dumb to read the
fucking manual.
Where do you draw the line? Someday we're going to have real reverse
dependecy checking, fixing, etc. So any idiot can blindly update x
package and not have to realize tha
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 01:02 pm, Derek Tracy wrote:
> On 11/19/05, Bill Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 21:42 Fri 18 Nov , Matthias Bethke wrote:
> > > I just noticed the new Gentoo kernel 2.6.14-r2 includes support for both
> > > the generic 802.11 stack and the Intel IPW2200 dr
On 11/22/05, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why? What do you expect to gain?
>
The computer I am installing this on is an old Compaq laptop with a
Cyrix MediaGX processor. Everything I have read suggests that this is
equivalent to an i586.
Am I wrong in thinking that the CHOST var
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 01:55 pm, Eric Bliss wrote:
> > >
> > > I tried the 2.6.14 kernel with the ipw2200 driver, and it didn't work.
> > > Maybe it was fixed in release 2.
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if the in-kernel driver supports turning your card
> > on in promiscuous mode?
> >
>
> Devi
fix_libtool_files.sh is in the root path so it ran by doing:
# fix_libtool_files.sh 3.3.4 I have resumed the build and only time will tell.
I should know in about a half hour.
On a wierd note, I am set up to receive list posts to a folder in Kmail. Since
posting my original question, I have gott
Hi there,
Has anyone had any joy getting one of these to work under Gentoo,
please? I bought it on the recommendations of users on
uk.comp.os.linux, as I was looking for a Linux-compatible card
available in the UK, but apparently no-one on that group is using the
card under Gentoo.
Highpoin
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 17:11 -0500, Matthew Cline wrote:
> On 11/22/05, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Why? What do you expect to gain?
> >
>
> The computer I am installing this on is an old Compaq laptop with a
> Cyrix MediaGX processor. Everything I have read suggests that thi
Actually, as someone who uses wireless across a number of nets, wireless
on gentoo sucks hugely.
Was at a presentation the other day and saw an Ubutu user just walk in,
a couple of quick commands and he had connected - after much work I
still cant do that to a particular no-encryption net. I am
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:24:49 -0800, Manuel McLure wrote:
> > Try plugging in a wireless NIC. It's not hard to set on up manually
> > when you know what you are doing, but other distros will take care of
> > this automatically.
>
> Perhaps if you're using WEP it's easier on a binary distro, but if
William Kenworthy wrote:
Actually, as someone who uses wireless across a number of nets, wireless
on gentoo sucks hugely.
Was at a presentation the other day and saw an Ubutu user just walk in,
a couple of quick commands and he had connected - after much work I
still cant do that to a particu
Thanks guys! it worked
--
Regards, Ernie
100% Microsoft and Intel free
14:24:38 up 20:16, 3 users, load average: 1.77, 2.35, 2.56
Linux 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 11/22/05, Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 17:11 -0500, Matthew Cline wrote:
> > On 11/22/05, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Why? What do you expect to gain?
> > >
> >
> > The computer I am installing this on is an old Compaq laptop with
Hi,
Does anyone know what network activity is being shown by xosview? Is it
activity before iptables filtering, or after? I wonder as I am getting
a constant flow varying between 100-1000 as read on xosview.
I get this with no internet related running processes. I have a default
block on my fi
>From Bugzilla Bug 113241 mysql-5.0.16 is out
Thanks for the fast report, here it is :
-ChangeLog
Version bump for the 5.0 series.
The ebuild has been rewritten, it's the first step to slot the mysql
database
server. (diff 5.0.16 and 5.0.16-r3
Stroller wrote:
Hi there,
Has anyone had any joy getting one of these to work under Gentoo,
please? I bought it on the recommendations of users on uk.comp.os.linux,
as I was looking for a Linux-compatible card available in the UK, but
apparently no-one on that group is using the card under G
Hi,
I am using sysklogd with iptables. I am wondering what the best
strategy is for sending iptables log output to a single file, rather
than having logged packets show up all over in /var/log/? I haven't
been able yet to figure this out by myself. I must be missing some doc
info somewhere.
Th
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 18:32 -0800, Rob wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using sysklogd with iptables. I am wondering what the best
> strategy is for sending iptables log output to a single file, rather
> than having logged packets show up all over in /var/log/? I haven't
> been able yet to figure this out
On 11/22/05, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ fdisk -l /dev/plextor_memstick
> Disk /dev/plextor_memstick: 1050 MB, 1050934784 bytes
> 129 heads, 19 sectors/track, 837 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 2451 * 512 = 1254912 bytes
>
>
On 11/22/05, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK, there should be no difference in code produced by
> "i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc" and "i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -march=i586". If
> there is, then things like distcc should be horribly broken.
Well, I've been following a related thread on gentoo
Matthew Cline schrieb:
> Am I wrong in thinking that the CHOST variable should reflect the kind
> of processor in the machine?
Yes.
> Wouldn't leaving the CHOST at
> "i386-pc-linux-gnu" build unoptimized binaries?
No.
Alexander Skwar
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
59 matches
Mail list logo
