Crayon wrote:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:26, Thomas Rösner wrote:
BTW, how/why was an ezmlm-clone chosen over Mailman for the gentoo
lists? Performance?
Possibly because mailman has had a fair number of security issues over the
years whereas qmail/ezmlm had practically none.
On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:26, Thomas Rösner wrote:
> BTW, how/why was an ezmlm-clone chosen over Mailman for the gentoo
> lists? Performance?
Possibly because mailman has had a fair number of security issues over the
years whereas qmail/ezmlm had practically none.
> I wonder everytime I s
2 matches
Mail list logo