Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 00:52:16 Paul Hartman wrote: > > So Putty doesn't really suck in isolation. It does work and can really > > operate any different way. Using Putty on it's host platform sucks to > > someone who is used to much more efficient way to accomplish the same > > task. > > Have you

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Monday 16 March 2009 22:20:37 Paul Hartman wrote: >> > I wouldn't really have minded the inconvenience, except that while all >> > this was going on, the largest data centre in the Southern Hemisphere was >> > dropping off the air one rout

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:34:44 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > And the screen is almost unreadable (it wasn't three years ago...) Pixels shrivel with age ;-) -- Neil Bothwick Fasten your seatbelt ... I wanna try something. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Dale
Justin wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> yes, but that does not help you in case of an accidental power failure >> before >> you had a chance to update the config files. >> >> >> > > power failure is always something extra ordinary! > > It's not here. Our power goes out somet

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 16 March 2009 22:20:37 Paul Hartman wrote: > > I wouldn't really have minded the inconvenience, except that while all > > this was going on, the largest data centre in the Southern Hemisphere was > > dropping off the air one router at a time, my desktop machine was > > panicing after 4 mi

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Monday 16 March 2009 21:30:19 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> On Montag 16 März 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> > A quick heads-up if you upgrade to the latest udev in portage. >> > >> > Don't do what I did and postpone the etc-update step ti

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Justin
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > yes, but that does not help you in case of an accidental power failure before > you had a chance to update the config files. > > power failure is always something extra ordinary! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Montag 16 März 2009, Justin wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Montag 16 März 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> A quick heads-up if you upgrade to the latest udev in portage. > >> > >> Don't do what I did and postpone the etc-update step till later, forget > >> about it in the rush of try

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 16 March 2009 21:30:19 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Montag 16 März 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > A quick heads-up if you upgrade to the latest udev in portage. > > > > Don't do what I did and postpone the etc-update step till later, forget > > about it in the rush of trying to get wo

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Justin
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Montag 16 März 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> A quick heads-up if you upgrade to the latest udev in portage. >> >> Don't do what I did and postpone the etc-update step till later, forget >> about it in the rush of trying to get work done, and then need to reboot. >>

Re: [gentoo-user] udev-140

2009-03-16 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Montag 16 März 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: > A quick heads-up if you upgrade to the latest udev in portage. > > Don't do what I did and postpone the etc-update step till later, forget > about it in the rush of trying to get work done, and then need to reboot. > When the machine boots, sysfs does