chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 7 Feb, David Relson wrote:
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:20:19 -0800
James Ausmus wrote:
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:07 PM, David Relson
wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:13:33 -0500
Willie Wong wrote:
On Sa
On 7 Feb, David Relson wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:20:19 -0800
> James Ausmus wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:07 PM, David Relson
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:13:33 -0500
>> > Willie Wong wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 06:29:27PM -0500, David Relson wrote:
>> > > >
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 09:35:54AM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> Looking in /etc/mtab, the last line is:
>
>none /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
>
> Perhaps the mount devpts command should have been issued as part of
> emerging udev, openrc, or sysinit ??? Should this be reported to
> b.g.o.??
Odd, t
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:20:19 -0800
James Ausmus wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:07 PM, David Relson
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:13:33 -0500
> > Willie Wong wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 06:29:27PM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> > > > Your replies are much appreciated as we're i
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:07 PM, David Relson wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:13:33 -0500
> Willie Wong wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 06:29:27PM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> > > Your replies are much appreciated as we're in an area of Linux about
> > > which I'm poorly informed.
> > >
> > > O
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:13:33 -0500
Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 06:29:27PM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> > Your replies are much appreciated as we're in an area of Linux about
> > which I'm poorly informed.
> >
> > Output (below) of "rc-status sysinit" indicated devfs stopped, so I
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 06:29:27PM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> Your replies are much appreciated as we're in an area of Linux about
> which I'm poorly informed.
>
> Output (below) of "rc-status sysinit" indicated devfs stopped, so I
> started devfs (which didn't change /dev/pt*), then restarted u
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:27:14 -0500
Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:08:58PM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> > The output of "ls /dev/pt*" is suspiciously short:
> >
> >r...@osage / # ls /dev/pts
> > /dev/ptmx
> >
> > /dev/pts:
>
> That's it? There's nothing under /de
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:08:58PM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> The output of "ls /dev/pt*" is suspiciously short:
>
>r...@osage / # ls /dev/pts
> /dev/ptmx
>
> /dev/pts:
That's it? There's nothing under /dev/pts? And you have terminals
running in X?
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:11:07 -0500
Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:33:44AM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> > This morning, all of the sudden, I'm encountering process creation
> > problems. The problems seem to affect only bash. There are no
> > problems starting X applications like
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:13:02 -0500
Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 10:00:33AM -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
> > How complete is this list? I assume you didn't reboot recently into
> > a new kernel?
>
> Also, if you did reboot recently (maybe into the same kernel), cat
> /etc/fstab for me
H'lo Willie,
The output of "ls /dev/pt*" is suspiciously short:
r...@osage / # ls /dev/pts
/dev/ptmx
/dev/pts:
udev was emerged twice quite recently:
1/26 upgrade from 141-r1 to 146-r2
1/32 downgrade from 146-r2 to 146-r1
My computer was last rebooted 21 days ago.
As you
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 10:00:33AM -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
> How complete is this list? I assume you didn't reboot recently into a
> new kernel?
Also, if you did reboot recently (maybe into the same kernel), cat
/etc/fstab for me?
W
--
Willie W. Wong ww...@
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:33:44AM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> This morning, all of the sudden, I'm encountering process creation
> problems. The problems seem to affect only bash. There are no problems
> starting X applications like firefox and open office.
Also, can you log-in on a vc? If you
Stabbing in the dark here: I don't think this is a bash problem. Most
likely something else broke on your system.
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:33:44AM -0500, David Relson wrote:
> ssh into box gives:
>
> PTY allocation request failed on channel 0
Issue 'ls /dev/pt*' for me?
> ### recently
15 matches
Mail list logo
