On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:18:40 +0800
kwk...@hkbn.net wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0700
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> > On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > > > Just browsed the changelog
Am Montag, 23. April 2012, 06:31:31 schrieb Graham Murray:
> kwk...@hkbn.net writes:
> > Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
> > packages after glibc upgrade, for they must have not used pam or any
> > other packages that uses dlopen().
>
> So which packages need to
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:42:28 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Strange, never had problems in that regard.
See, for example, the problem described in thread
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/msg_264b8690e0ab67e3f55c0967cba101ec.xml
from this list last November with glibc-2.14 upgrade, w
Am 23.04.2012 04:12, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
>
> On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
> mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> > Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
>> >
>> > http://sourceware.org/ml/lib
Strange, never had problems in that regard.
Am 23.04.2012 05:24 schrieb :
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 A...
Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
packages after glibc upgrade, for they must have not used pam or any
o
Rebuilt everything. Congrats
Am 23.04.2012 04:17 schrieb "Pandu Poluan" :
On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag,...
What about statically linked packages?
Rgds,
kwk...@hkbn.net writes:
> Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
> packages after glibc upgrade, for they must have not used pam or any
> other packages that uses dlopen().
So which packages need to be rebuilt? Owing to the initial
non-availability of the patch file,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
> wrote:
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > > Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
> > >
> > > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg
On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
> >
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
> >
> > When I read the NEWS section there with all that "op
Am 22.04.2012 20:05, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> no, because it is a library. You make use of it anyway.
Ah, yes, sure ... thanks for the explanation.
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
>
> When I read the NEWS section there with all that "optimized" stuff I
> wonder if it makes any sense to rebuild packages
11 matches
Mail list logo