Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2015 09:51:47 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:20:53 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>> True but I had already re-synced a few times by then. I'm pretty sure
>>> what Neil was thinking is that when I synced, I just caught the tree in
>>> a state where so
On Friday 24 July 2015 09:51:47 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:20:53 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > True but I had already re-synced a few times by then. I'm pretty sure
> > what Neil was thinking is that when I synced, I just caught the tree in
> > a state where some ebuilds were updated a
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:20:53 -0500, Dale wrote:
> True but I had already re-synced a few times by then. I'm pretty sure
> what Neil was thinking is that when I synced, I just caught the tree in
> a state where some ebuilds were updated and some were not.
Yes, it happens and usually resolves itse
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 02:30:18 PM Dale wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:56:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, after fighting to get it to build, they remove it and it wants to go
back to the old version I had that worked. ROFLMBO
>>> And today'
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 02:30:18 PM Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:56:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> So, after fighting to get it to build, they remove it and it wants to go
> >> back to the old version I had that worked. ROFLMBO
> >
> > And today's lesson is: If an
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:56:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> So, after fighting to get it to build, they remove it and it wants to go
>> back to the old version I had that worked. ROFLMBO
> And today's lesson is: If an ebuild fails, re-sync and try again (or
> search Bugzilla which
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:56:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
> So, after fighting to get it to build, they remove it and it wants to go
> back to the old version I had that worked. ROFLMBO
And today's lesson is: If an ebuild fails, re-sync and try again (or
search Bugzilla which may well tell you to re-sync
Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Monday, July 20, 2015 05:05:44 PM Dale wrote:
>>> Now I'm only left wondering about mkvtoolnix package. It still fails.
>>> Going to see what depends on that and remove it if I can.
>>>
>>> Thanks much. Thanks to Alan as well.
>>>
>>> Dale
>>>
>>> :-) :-)
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Monday, July 20, 2015 05:05:44 PM Dale wrote:
>> Now I'm only left wondering about mkvtoolnix package. It still fails.
>> Going to see what depends on that and remove it if I can.
>>
>> Thanks much. Thanks to Alan as well.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
> Dale,
>
> When I chec
On Monday, July 20, 2015 05:05:44 PM Dale wrote:
> Now I'm only left wondering about mkvtoolnix package. It still fails.
> Going to see what depends on that and remove it if I can.
>
> Thanks much. Thanks to Alan as well.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
Dale,
When I check mkvtoolnix, I only see a 6.x
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Dale wrote:
As you say, this makes no sense. It's like running in circles or
something. Mostly or something.
If you need more info, let me know. I'
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> As you say, this makes no sense. It's like running in circles or
>>> something. Mostly or something.
>>>
>>> If you need more info, let me know. I'm pretty much clueless here.
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Dale wrote:
>> As you say, this makes no sense. It's like running in circles or
>> something. Mostly or something.
>>
>> If you need more info, let me know. I'm pretty much clueless here.
>>
> What do you have in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS? Are you mi
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Dale wrote:
> As you say, this makes no sense. It's like running in circles or
> something. Mostly or something.
>
> If you need more info, let me know. I'm pretty much clueless here.
>
What do you have in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS? Are you mixing arch and ~arch packages
On 20/07/2015 22:45, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 20/07/2015 21:17, Dale wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> New emerge failure. It seems static-dev does not like udev,devfs or
>>> tmpfs for some mount point, not sure which that is tho.
>>
>> This make no sense to me.
>>
>> eudev is a dynamic /
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 20/07/2015 21:17, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> New emerge failure. It seems static-dev does not like udev,devfs or
>> tmpfs for some mount point, not sure which that is tho.
>
> This make no sense to me.
>
> eudev is a dynamic /dev manager so you don't have to deal with d
On 20/07/2015 21:17, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> New emerge failure. It seems static-dev does not like udev,devfs or
> tmpfs for some mount point, not sure which that is tho.
This make no sense to me.
eudev is a dynamic /dev manager so you don't have to deal with doing it
statically
static-dev i
17 matches
Mail list logo
