On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 11:17:11 +, Mick wrote:
> > Another option is to copy/symlink the specific package you want from
> > the bar overlay to your local overlay and do not include the bar
> > overlay in repos.conf.
>
> Sorry for being dense. Do you mean first add the overlay with 'layman
> -
On Sunday 19 Feb 2017 10:50:31 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 11:45:27 +0100, Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> > > So I tried in /etc/portage/package.provided any combination of these:
> > >
> > > x11-wm/enlightenment-:0.17/::bar
> > >
> > > =x11-wm/enlightenment-:0.17
> > >
On Sunday 19 Feb 2017 11:45:27 Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> On 19.02.2017 11:20, Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Given sddm is not working for my setup, as per bug #608690, I thought of
> > trying entrance from the bar overlay. It wants to pull in enlightenment,
> > which I have already installe
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 11:45:27 +0100, Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> > So I tried in /etc/portage/package.provided any combination of these:
> >
> > x11-wm/enlightenment-:0.17/::bar
> >
> > =x11-wm/enlightenment-:0.17
> >
> > x11-wm/enlightenment-
> >
> > None of which can stop portag
On 19.02.2017 11:20, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Given sddm is not working for my setup, as per bug #608690, I thought of
> trying entrance from the bar overlay. It wants to pull in enlightenment,
> which I have already installed from the main tree and would like to keep it
> as
> such:
>
> # em
Harry Putnam wrote:
Setup:
Installing X on Vbox vm runnning gentoo (amd64 not strict). Host
is win10 (64bit)
Installing the xorg-server is calling for the installation of
app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.0.32
However, my version of vbox is for a windows host (5.1.14). And
act
On 14.02.2017 16:09, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup:
>
>Installing X on Vbox vm runnning gentoo (amd64 not strict). Host
>is win10 (64bit)
>
> Installing the xorg-server is calling for the installation of
> app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.0.32
>
> However, my version of vbox is for
On Monday, 12. September 2011 18:41:37 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> In my /etc/portage/profile/package.provided, I have this:
>
>media-libs/freetype-1.4_pre20080316-r2
>
> When I try to emerge freetype however, instead of emerging the newer
> version, I get:
>
>$ emerge freetype
>
>WA
On Sep 12, 2011 11:11 PM, "Nikos Chantziaras" wrote:
>
> In my /etc/portage/profile/package.provided, I have this:
>
> media-libs/freetype-1.4_pre20080316-r2
>
> When I try to emerge freetype however, instead of emerging the newer
version, I get:
>
> $ emerge freetype
>
> WARNING: A requested p
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:20:02 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Actually the changes I want to make are not so few. The whole story is
> that several days ago a friend of mine pointed me to a very cool
> front-end for mplayer: http://smplayer.sourceforge.net/
> Unfortunately it can't be found in portage
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:35:27 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> (1) echo media-video/mplayer >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
This just causes portage to use the testing, ~arch version of the program
> (2) echo media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc2_p24929-r2
> >> /etc/portage/package.provided
This should be /et
On January 8, 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:23:58 +0200
>
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:11:09 +0200
>
> --snip--
>
> > Am I correct in saying you plan to emerge mplayer with a few extra
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:35:27 +0200
Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to compile mplayer in a way not supported by the ebuild and use
> portage only to keep record of the files installed in system for
> future uninstallation.
>
> The system amd64 stable.
>
> I have done the
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:23:58 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:11:09 +0200
--snip--
> Am I correct in saying you plan to emerge mplayer with a few extra
> params and not much else customizing? In that case the
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:11:09 +0200
>
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A much better way would be to modify the ebuild to do what you
> > want, then copy it to a local overlay. Portage will use your
> > overlay in preference to the porta
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:11:09 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A much better way would be to modify the ebuild to do what you want,
> then copy it to a local overlay. Portage will use your overlay in
> preference to the portage tree. You just have to then watch out for
> newer
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to compile mplayer in a way not supported by the ebuild and
> use portage only to keep record of the files installed in system for
> future uninstallation.
A much better way would be to modify the ebuild to do what you want,
then co
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:35:27 +0200 Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I want to compile mplayer in a way not supported by the ebuild and use
> portage only to keep record of the files installed in system for
> future uninstallation.
>
> The system amd64 stable.
>
> I have done the following
On Wed, 09 May 2007 23:23:54 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > > Following the official docs [1] I did
> > > > "echo x11-wm/aquamarine-0.2.1
> > > > >> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided" but it doesn't seem to
> > > > >> help.
>
> should there be a = before the package name?
No, not for
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 12:22 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007 13:13:05 -0700
> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Daniel Iliev wrote:
> > > Following the official docs [1] I did
> > > "echo x11-wm/aquamarine-0.2.1
> > > >> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided" but it does
On Tue, 08 May 2007 13:13:05 -0700
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Iliev wrote:
> > Following the official docs [1] I did
> > "echo x11-wm/aquamarine-0.2.1
> > >> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided" but it doesn't seem to
> > >> help.
>
> The way that emerge currently behaves,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Following the official docs [1] I did
> "echo x11-wm/aquamarine-0.2.1 >> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided"
> but it doesn't seem to help.
The way that emerge currently behaves, that won't help if aquamarine
is listed in /va
On Tue, 8 May 2007 17:39:17 +0200
"Daniel Pielmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have x11-wm/beryl-0.2.1 installed on a stable system. One of its
> > dependencies is ~x11-wm/aquamarine-0.2.1 which dies during
> > compilation. This is fine with me because I installed beryl issuing:
> > "emerge
I have x11-wm/beryl-0.2.1 installed on a stable system. One of its
dependencies is ~x11-wm/aquamarine-0.2.1 which dies during compilation.
This is fine with me because I installed beryl issuing:
"emerge --resume --skipfirst"
and it works OK. My problem is that portage wants to pull in aquamarine
e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> Great, I knew there must be a solution for this issue. Thanks for
>> interpreting the man page for me ;) Perhaps it could be more clear what
>> "site-specific overrides" means but now I know. Thanks again
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Great, I knew there must be a solution for this issue. Thanks for
> interpreting the man page for me ;) Perhaps it could be more clear what
> "site-specific overrides" means but now I know. Thanks again.
Could you suggest wording that would make it more clear to you? There's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:22:54 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
>> Is there any other solution to the /etc/make.profile/package.provided
>> file? As we all know the /usr/portage/ dir gets wiped of custom files on
>> every sync. It see
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:22:54 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Is there any other solution to the /etc/make.profile/package.provided
> file? As we all know the /usr/portage/ dir gets wiped of custom files on
> every sync. It seems kinda silly that there is a package.provided
> solution but it gets wipe
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 08:22:54PM -0500, Penguin Lover Jeremy Olexa squawked:
> Hi,
> Is there any other solution to the /etc/make.profile/package.provided
> file? As we all know the /usr/portage/ dir gets wiped of custom files on
> every sync. It seems kinda silly that there is a package.provided
Check out /etc/make.conf - that will override some settings. You aren't
supposed to mess with the make.profile - it's a defalt that all else is based
on.
On Sunday July 16 2006 21:22, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any other solution to the /etc/make.profile/package.provided
> file? As we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm currently trying to get thru an emerge -vuD world but having
> various things crop up. Some I thought were handled long ago like
> this overlooking what is in package.provided:
>
> rsnapshot-1.2.2
> bacula-1.48.5
> cvs
Harry Putnam wrote:
in package.provided:
cvs-emacs-24
[snip]
emerge -vuDp app-editors/emacs-cvs
Don't you see that cvs-emacs is not the same as emacs-cvs, or was this
just a typo on your part?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 9/10/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:50:24 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> >Thanks. That seems to work and is indeed a much better place to put
> > it. I did not see that in the man pages (is it there?) so I appreciate
> > the pointer.
>
> It's buried in
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:50:24 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>Thanks. That seems to work and is indeed a much better place to put
> it. I did not see that in the man pages (is it there?) so I appreciate
> the pointer.
It's buried in the portage man page. Basically, what you put
in /etc/portage/prof
On 9/10/05, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10 Sep 2005, at 16:15, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >Generic question - why is package.provided located in
> > /etc/make.profile instead of in /etc/portage? Won't l lose my edits
> > when profile changes come along?
> >
> >It seem
On 10 Sep 2005, at 16:15, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
Generic question - why is package.provided located in
/etc/make.profile instead of in /etc/portage? Won't l lose my edits
when profile changes come along?
It seems to me that if I take responsibility for a package, such as
jack-audio-conne
36 matches
Mail list logo
