from http://gentoo-portage.com/sys-kernel/openvz-sources, i see that
openvz-sources-2.6.27.6.1 is already the latest stable version, and
the other 2 newer versions are hard masked.
does anybody know how stable these masked version are?
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Kyle Bader wrote:
> Ext4
Ext4 was very new around 2.6.27,. The kenel is likely refusing to
mount the filesystem because the kernel driver is experimental (old)
and the filesystem was created when a different kernel was loaded (non
experimental ext4). Using the old driver could compromise the
integrity so the kernel refuse
sure, i do not need ext4dev, i want to use ext4 only. but i did not
find a compile option for ext4, i only find a option for ext4dev/ext4.
the openvz i emerged is 2.6.27.6.1, which is the latest stable
version. is it too old? should i try newer unstable version?
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:40 PM,
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 19:34 +0800, Xi Shen wrote:
> i emerged the openvz kernel, and compiled the kernel with ext4dev/ext4
> file system support. but when i tried to boot my system, i got a
> kernel panic. it says cannot mount my ext4 root, because it is not
> marked ok to use with test code.
>
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
