Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-25 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 10:38:11AM -0800, maxim wexler wrote > I've got CONFIG_PROTECT "-*" in my make.conf on a > seperate line IIRC to spare me the tedium of accepting > manually long lists of default settings when something > is emerged. Does this have the same effect as in the > USE variable l

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-25 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:38:11 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote: > I've got CONFIG_PROTECT "-*" in my make.conf on a > seperate line IIRC to spare me the tedium of accepting > manually long lists of default settings when something > is emerged. Does this have the same effect as in the > USE variable

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-25 Thread maxim wexler
> > It was garbage like this that finally convinced me > to put "-*" at the > front of my USE variable, I've got CONFIG_PROTECT "-*" in my make.conf on a seperate line IIRC to spare me the tedium of accepting manually long lists of default settings when something is emerged. Does this have the

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-25 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:30:23 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > > It does, but since you have no reference to cups in make.conf, the > > default is used. Many USE flags are enabled by default in the profile, > > add -cups to make.conf to override this. > > It was garbage like this that finally convinc

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-24 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:24:26AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:18:16 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote: > > > Oh, and another thing: I don't have cups in my make.conf. Doesn't > > make.conf override the defaults? > > It does, but since you have no reference to cups in make.c

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-16 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:42:55 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote: > Sorry, meant vorbis-tools vorbis-tools does not use the cups USE flag, try grep cups /usr/portage/media-sound/vorbis-tools/*.ebuild -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 43: Genuine imitation signature.asc Description: PGP sign

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-16 Thread maxim wexler
--- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:18:16 -0800 (PST) > maxim wexler wrote: > > > Hello everybody, > > > > I notice emerge ogg-vorbis insists on taking cups > > along with it. emerge info reveals cups flag _is_ > > being used. But why use it then? What does > p

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:18:16 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote: > Oh, and another thing: I don't > have cups in my make.conf. Doesn't make.conf override > the defaults? It does, but since you have no reference to cups in make.conf, the default is used. Many USE flags are enabled by default in the p

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-14 Thread Chris White
On Thursday 15 December 2005 09:18, maxim wexler wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I notice emerge ogg-vorbis insists on taking cups > along with it. emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "ogg-vorbis". eh? > emerge info reveals cups flag _is_ > being used. But why use it then? What does printing

Re: [gentoo-user] ogg-vorbis tools and cups

2005-12-14 Thread Nick Rout
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:18:16 -0800 (PST) maxim wexler wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I notice emerge ogg-vorbis insists on taking cups > along with it. emerge info reveals cups flag _is_ > being used. But why use it then? What does printing > have to do with playing ogg files. Why not go through