On Monday 2 December 2024 17:56:38 GMT Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 November 2024 16:13:01 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > [New readers start here... :) ]
> >
> > I've spent several days-worth of my time over the last few weeks in trying
> > to get my i5 box to export its por
On Thursday 5 December 2024 00:55:38 GMT Alexis wrote:
> Peter Humphrey writes:
> > What does the team think can be done about it?
>
> I'm not a Gentoo dev, merely someone who (a) has Strong Opinions
> about the need for good documentation, and (b) has contributed
> significantly to various FOSS
Peter Humphrey writes:
What does the team think can be done about it?
i'm not a Gentoo dev, merely someone who (a) has Strong Opinions
about the need for good documentation, and (b) has contributed
significantly to various FOSS docs, most recently the Gentoo
wiki[a].
First and foremost,
On Tuesday 3 December 2024 13:28:44 Greenwich Mean Time I wrote:
> On Tuesday 3 December 2024 13:08:51 Greenwich Mean Time Matt Jolly wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On 27 November 2024 2:13:01 am AEST, Peter Humphrey
> >
> wrote:
> > >Someone needs to have a look at the nfs-utils wiki page. I'd do
On Tuesday 3 December 2024 13:08:51 Greenwich Mean Time Matt Jolly wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 27 November 2024 2:13:01 am AEST, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> >Someone needs to have a look at the nfs-utils wiki page. I'd do something
> >myself, but how? I raised a bug against a document once, only to be
Hi Peter,
On 27 November 2024 2:13:01 am AEST, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>Someone needs to have a look at the nfs-utils wiki page. I'd do something
>myself, but how? I raised a bug against a document once, only to be rebuked.
You can raise issues on the "Talk" page for a given article, e.g.
https
On Tuesday 3 December 2024 11:44:50 Greenwich Mean Time Michael wrote:
> ... I think there should be clearer disambiguation with separate examples
> between v3 and v4. However, isn't NFS v3 considered legacy by now?
Perhaps, but that wiki page was apparently last changed on 2 August this year.
-
On Tuesday 3 December 2024 11:29:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 2 December 2024 17:56:38 Greenwich Mean Time Michael wrote:
> > I had (another) look at the wiki. You're right, it seems to describe
> > NFSv3
> > only. I don't have NFSv3 here to compare. With NFSv4 you export the
> > gl
On Monday 2 December 2024 17:56:38 Greenwich Mean Time Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 November 2024 16:13:01 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I've spent several days-worth of my time over the last few weeks in trying
> > to get my i5 box to export its portage tree and packages directory to a
> > chroo
On Tuesday 26 November 2024 16:13:01 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> [New readers start here... :) ]
>
> I've spent several days-worth of my time over the last few weeks in trying
> to get my i5 box to export its portage tree and packages directory to a
> chroot on my M9 machine. I r
On Thursday 31 October 2024 14:21:27 GMT Michael wrote:
> On Thursday 31 October 2024 11:07:13 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I've always used static addresses. The exception is the wireless network,
> > on which things come and go. I'm confident in dnsmasq on the wired LAN -
> > it's been running f
On Thursday 31 October 2024 11:07:13 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 31 October 2024 09:52:23 GMT Michael wrote:
> > Hmm ... if your NFS configuration works over wired Ethernet, but not over
> > wireless, this could point to a lower network level problem.
>
> I remember you said something
On Thursday 31 October 2024 09:52:23 GMT Michael wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 October 2024 23:24:19 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 October 2024 16:00:36 GMT I wrote:
> >
> > --->8
> >
> > Well, it looks as though I have it working, over an Ethernet link anyway.
> > There's now no /mnt/n
On Wednesday 30 October 2024 23:24:19 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2024 16:00:36 GMT I wrote:
>
> --->8
>
> Well, it looks as though I have it working, over an Ethernet link anyway.
> There's now no /mnt/nfs with fsid=0, with the portage tree and the packages
> directory mou
On Thursday 17 October 2024 16:00:36 GMT I wrote:
--->8
Well, it looks as though I have it working, over an Ethernet link anyway.
There's now no /mnt/nfs with fsid=0, with the portage tree and the packages
directory mounted below it. This is /etc/exports on the i5:
/var/db/repos/gentoo
wstn.prh
On Wednesday 23 October 2024 12:36:23 BST Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 12:56, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I should have added that the remote compilation works well with the cable.
> > I have found though that the linux-firmware ebuild requires the /boot
> > partition to be mounted,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 12:56, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I should have added that the remote compilation works well with the cable. I
> have found though that the linux-firmware ebuild requires the /boot partition
> to be mounted, which it shouldn't be on a foreign machine, so I say
> emerge -uaDvN -
On Tuesday 22 October 2024 22:07:06 BST I wrote:
> Also while bug-hunting, I found an extra-long Ethernet cable and strung the
> i5 into the LAN that way. The M9 only ever sees the LAN, whereas I can now
> start and stop the LAN and WLAN at will on the i5. The Fritz!Box router
> sits at the juncti
On Tuesday 22 October 2024 20:29:14 BST Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 October 2024 18:01:55 BST Matt Jolly wrote:
> > It should not matter; the virtual root involves bind mounting directories
> > into a single location - that could be 4 different partitions, a bunch of
> > subvolumes, or some dire
On Tuesday 22 October 2024 18:01:55 BST Matt Jolly wrote:
> It should not matter; the virtual root involves bind mounting directories
> into a single location - that could be 4 different partitions, a bunch of
> subvolumes, or some directories scattered across a single partition, or
> some combinat
It should not matter; the virtual root involves bind mounting directories into a single location - that could be 4 different partitions, a bunch of subvolumes, or some directories scattered across a single partition, or some combination of those options.Cheers,MattOn 22 Oct 2024 23:36, Michael wro
On Tuesday 22 October 2024 13:00:14 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 October 2024 10:14:48 BST Michael wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 October 2024 02:10:45 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > On Monday 21 October 2024 09:22:37 BST Michael wrote:
> > > > Assuming all required directories are on the s
On Tuesday 22 October 2024 10:14:48 BST Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 October 2024 02:10:45 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Monday 21 October 2024 09:22:37 BST Michael wrote:
> > > Assuming all required directories are on the same fs, what happens if
> > > you
> > > *only* export the parent direc
On Tuesday 22 October 2024 02:10:45 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 21 October 2024 09:22:37 BST Michael wrote:
> > Assuming all required directories are on the same fs, what happens if you
> > *only* export the parent directory? Something like this:
> >
> > /mnt/nfs \
> > 192.168.178.7/32(
On Monday 21 October 2024 09:22:37 BST Michael wrote:
> Assuming all required directories are on the same fs, what happens if you
> *only* export the parent directory? Something like this:
>
> /mnt/nfs \
> 192.168.178.7/32(rw,sync,insecure,no_subtree_check,all_squash,anonuid=250,an
> ongid=250)
On Monday 21 October 2024 03:12:23 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 18 October 2024 15:55:19 BST Michael wrote:
>
> --->8
>
> > exportfs -rav
>
> Ah! I knew about 'exportfs -r' but not the 'av'. When I added that I got
> this:
>
> exportfs: duplicated export entries:
> exportfs:
> :1
On 21/10/24 10:12, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Friday 18 October 2024 15:55:19 BST Michael wrote:
--->8
exportfs -rav
Ah! I knew about 'exportfs -r' but not the 'av'. When I added that I got this:
exportfs: duplicated export entries:
exportfs:
:192.168.178.7(rw,sync,insecure,no_subtree
On Friday 18 October 2024 15:55:19 BST Michael wrote:
--->8
> exportfs -rav
Ah! I knew about 'exportfs -r' but not the 'av'. When I added that I got this:
exportfs: duplicated export entries:
exportfs:
:192.168.178.7(rw,sync,insecure,no_subtree_check,all_squash,anonuid=250,anongid=250)
e
On 10/18/24 9:41 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Greetings,
Let me try this again.
Why should an NFS server wait 15 seconds before reporting "No such file or
directory"?
Are there any errors in the log on the server? Increasing the verbosity
of the log there might be informative.
On Friday 18 October 2024 14:41:03 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Let me try this again.
>
> Why should an NFS server wait 15 seconds before reporting "No such file or
> directory"?
I couldn't find anything conspicuously wrong in your setup, but I don't have
much in depth experience
Andrea Conti [12-11-12 20:00]:
> Hi,
>
> > As an alternative to quickpkg and friends:
> > Mount the beaglebones rootfs to /usr/$CTARGET of my Gentoo Linux PC.
> > Then nfs-mount a part of my Linux PC filesystem on /usr/$CTARGET/tmp
>
> No need for nfs, just bind mount /tmp onto /usr/$CTARGET/tmp
Hi,
> As an alternative to quickpkg and friends:
> Mount the beaglebones rootfs to /usr/$CTARGET of my Gentoo Linux PC.
> Then nfs-mount a part of my Linux PC filesystem on /usr/$CTARGET/tmp
No need for nfs, just bind mount /tmp onto /usr/$CTARGET/tmp.
Look up the --bind option in the man page o
32 matches
Mail list logo
