-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> Why are you posting this? Was I unclear about anything?
Nevermind, man.
- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica
¿Su empresa consume demasiado ancho de banda? ¡Consulteme!
Free (a
On Thursday 05 July 2007 20:07:58 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> > -u means direct deps will be updated too and that the target (in this
> > case claws-mail) won't be remerged unless there's an upgrade (or
> > downgrade). Without -u it still merges the latest visible version of the
> > target i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> -u means direct deps will be updated too and that the target (in this case
> claws-mail) won't be remerged unless there's an upgrade (or downgrade).
> Without -u it still merges the latest visible version of the target i
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 02:09:43 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> David Relson wrote:
> > Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
>
> try "emerge -upv claws-mail"
>
> If you omit -u (means --upgrade), you will re-emerge currently installed
> version.
-u means direct
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:48:45 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Hello David Relson,
>
> > > Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want
> > > it you can unmask it in /etc/portage/package.unmask
>
> > At present, /etc/portage only has package.keywords. As
> > package.mask is not pr
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why assume that everyone runs x86? If you don't specify an arch in
> package.keywords, if defaults to ~whatever-arch-you-have-in-make.conf
>
Thanks, learned something new.
Roger
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:27:54 -0230, Roger Mason wrote:
> > As I want the latest and greatest version of claws-mail
> > in /etc/portage/package.keywords I have:
> >
> > mail-client/claws-mail
> Should'nt that be
>
> mail-client/claws-mail ~x86
Why assume that everyone runs x86? If you don'
David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I want the latest and greatest version of claws-mail
> in /etc/portage/package.keywords I have:
>
> mail-client/claws-mail
>
Should'nt that be
mail-client/claws-mail ~x86
?
HTH,
Roger
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hello David Relson,
> > Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want it
> > you can unmask it in /etc/portage/package.unmask
> At present, /etc/portage only has package.keywords. As package.mask is
> not present, it's not hard masked.
It is masked in /usr/portage/profiles/pa
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:48:46 +0200
Renat Golubchyk wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:48:01 -0400 David Relson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
>
> Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want it
> you can unmask it
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:09:43 -0300
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> David Relson wrote:
> > Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
>
> try "emerge -upv claws-mail"
>
> If you omit -u (means --upgrade), you will
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:48:01 -0400 David Relson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want it you
can unmask it in /etc/portage/package.unmask
Cheers,
Renat
--
Probleme kann man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David Relson wrote:
> Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
try "emerge -upv claws-mail"
If you omit -u (means --upgrade), you will re-emerge currently installed
version.
- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Ind
13 matches
Mail list logo
