> -Original Message-
> From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This could be bug #189720 which would mean you need to manually remerge
> slot 1
> of apr and apr-util.
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189720
It was actually left over files from a previous rev
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It looks like you still have the temporary files from a previous
> revdep-rebuild run, so you don't get to see the list of broken
packages.
> Add --ignore to the command.
>
Indeed there were some left over files and
On Saturday 17 November 2007 06:17:26 de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> How do I find out why apr-0.9.12 and apr-util-0.9.12 are pulled back
> when using revdep-rebuild? What I have currently is:
This could be bug #189720 which would mean you need to manually remerge slot 1
of apr and apr-util.
[1]
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:17:26 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> How do I find out why apr-0.9.12 and apr-util-0.9.12 are pulled back
> when using revdep-rebuild?
[snip]
> Here is the result from revdep-rebuild.
> --
> ->revdep-re
4 matches
Mail list logo
