Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Willie Wong wrote: Is net.eth0 a symlink to net.lo? If not, remove net.eth0 and symlink it to net.lo. wasn't and did. now fighting with squirrelmail upgrade and apache ssl not fun day. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Willie Wong
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:34:25PM -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > Renat Golubchyk wrote: > >On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > >>The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the > >>same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten

Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Renat Golubchyk wrote: On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happen

Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Renat Golubchyk
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the > same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. > > This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened? Did > someth