Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

2013-08-16 Thread William Kenworthy
On 16/08/13 22:31, William Kenworthy wrote: > On 16/08/13 22:15, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, William Kenworthy >> wrote: >>> On 16/08/13 15:34, Keith Dart wrote: Re , William Kenworthy said: > olympus ~ # ceph > File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

2013-08-16 Thread William Kenworthy
On 16/08/13 22:15, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, William Kenworthy wrote: >> On 16/08/13 15:34, Keith Dart wrote: >>> Re , William Kenworthy said: olympus ~ # ceph File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192 print '\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s)

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

2013-08-16 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, William Kenworthy wrote: > On 16/08/13 15:34, Keith Dart wrote: >> Re , William Kenworthy said: >>> olympus ~ # ceph >>> File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192 >>> print '\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s) >>> ^ >>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> olympus ~ # >>

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

2013-08-16 Thread William Kenworthy
On 16/08/13 15:34, Keith Dart wrote: > Re , William Kenworthy said: >> olympus ~ # ceph >> File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192 >> print '\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s) >> ^ >> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >> olympus ~ # > > > In Python 3 "print" is a function, and should be called like t

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

2013-08-16 Thread Keith Dart
Re , William Kenworthy said: > olympus ~ # ceph > File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192 > print '\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s) > ^ > SyntaxError: invalid syntax > olympus ~ # In Python 3 "print" is a function, and should be called like this: print('\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s)) This w