On 2/12/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 14:04 -0200, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> > On 2/4/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As I said. It wont be SicroMoft. I'm still wondering. At this time of
> > > writing I reduced the possibilities to Slackware or LFS.
> > >
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 14:04 -0200, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> On 2/4/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I said. It wont be SicroMoft. I'm still wondering. At this time of
> > writing I reduced the possibilities to Slackware or LFS.
> > I know, I'll need to do some work to get things running
On 2/4/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said. It wont be SicroMoft. I'm still wondering. At this time of
> writing I reduced the possibilities to Slackware or LFS.
> I know, I'll need to do some work to get things running but if they are
> running I know they ARE running. Nobody will "u
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 23:02 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 2/5/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > frankies ~ # #with stick
> > frankies ~ #
> > frankies ~ # ls /dev/ds*
> > ls: /dev/ds*: No such file or directory
>
> Oh, and you typo'd here...
>
> -Richard
>
:-D
yepp
--
gentoo-user@ge
On 2/5/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, this is set. I'd assume, if my devices are managed by UDEV than all
> of them are managed by UDEV. Aren't they?
>
> I've had a short look into 50-udev.rules. The only entries for USB are
> these.
This is normal. The /dev/sd* devices are not USB
On 2/5/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> frankies ~ # #with stick
> frankies ~ #
> frankies ~ # ls /dev/ds*
> ls: /dev/ds*: No such file or directory
Oh, and you typo'd here...
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 10:08 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 2/5/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All this was here ones again :(
>
> I posted this to your other thread, but you either didn't see it or
> didn't respond.
>
> Try "cat /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug". In your case, it should say
On 2/5/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All this was here ones again :(
I posted this to your other thread, but you either didn't see it or
didn't respond.
Try "cat /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug". In your case, it should say
"/sbin/udevsend".
However, we are _assuming_ that the system is star
On Sunday 05 February 2006 07:09, a tiny voice compelled Franta to write:
> All this was here ones again :(
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_USB_Mass_Storage_Device
Hopefully you'll figure it out with this.
--
Regards, Ernie
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 12:16 -0500, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> On Saturday 04 February 2006 09:02, a tiny voice compelled Franta to write:
> > Due to the issues I hit (nearly) every time I do an upgrade.
> >
> > I did the upograde today too. There was one on udev. I think devices
> > don't coming up (S
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:02:56 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> > I think the flames started when the OP made a basic mistake and
> > decided the whole distro was unsuitable for any serious use because
> > of his error.
> That could be true, but why do we let it continue?
I don't know, why are you
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 20:27 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:36:10 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
>
> > > With all that experience, I'm surprised you made such a basic mistake
> > > as overwriting a config file. Gentoo is careful to protect your
> > > configuration files from b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well man... if you don't like Gentoo because of it's privileges
(etc-update for example?) LFS IS FOR YOU, I'M PRETTY SURE.
Anyway, if you don't like Gentoo (or you don't know how to use it
), don't tell us Gentoo is. Post that thing in
Microsoft's fo
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:36:10 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> > With all that experience, I'm surprised you made such a basic mistake
> > as overwriting a config file. Gentoo is careful to protect your
> > configuration files from being overwritten by new releases, it takes a
> > deliberate action
On Saturday 04 February 2006 09:02, a tiny voice compelled Franta to write:
> Due to the issues I hit (nearly) every time I do an upgrade.
>
> I did the upograde today too. There was one on udev. I think devices
> don't coming up (Sound, USB) could belong to this kind of problems.
>
> Well. nothing
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 15:30 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:08:31 +0100, Franta wrote:
>
> > As I said. It wont be SicroMoft. I'm still wondering. At this time of
> > writing I reduced the possibilities to Slackware or LFS.
> > I know, I'll need to do some work to get things
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:08:31 +0100, Franta wrote:
> As I said. It wont be SicroMoft. I'm still wondering. At this time of
> writing I reduced the possibilities to Slackware or LFS.
> I know, I'll need to do some work to get things running but if they are
> running I know they ARE running. Nobody
On 2/4/06, Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Due to the issues I hit (nearly) every time I do an upgrade.I did the upograde today too. There was one on udev. I think devicesdon't coming up (Sound, USB) could belong to this kind of problems.Well. nothing changes.
I've tried it half an hour ago with
As I said. It wont be SicroMoft. I'm still wondering. At this time of
writing I reduced the possibilities to Slackware or LFS.
I know, I'll need to do some work to get things running but if they are
running I know they ARE running. Nobody will "upgrade" my system to make
them stop working and thus
On Saturday 04 February 2006 04:02 am, Franta wrote:
> Due to the issues I hit (nearly) every time I do an upgrade.
>
> I did the upograde today too. There was one on udev. I think devices
> don't coming up (Sound, USB) could belong to this kind of problems.
>
> Well. nothing changes.
>
> I've trie
20 matches
Mail list logo
