On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 13:53 +0100, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > You mean the 1 extra command that's needed to assemble a VG?
>
> It wasn't that easy, that's what I did in the end:
> 1) vgchange -a n
> 2) vgexport -a
> 3) vgimport -a
> 4) vgscan --mknodes
> 5) vgchange -a y
#5 is all I've ever ha
[...]
> The point is that LVM adds an extra layer of complexity.
>
> I used LVM paired with soft RAID, and when I needed to boot from a
> liveCD I discovered that I had to rebuild the setup by hand.
You mean the 1 extra command that's needed to assemble a VG?
On Sunday 22 March 2009 08:36:31 Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > With or without LVM if you lose a drive then you've lost the data on
> > it. LVM does have the capability of assembling a partially damaged
> > volume group just not a partially damaged logical volume which, when
> > you think about it,
On Sunday 22 March 2009 08:39:20 Francesco Talamona wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > It's correct, and it also highlights just what a PITA it is to
> > manipulate traditional disk partitions. With lvm, this becomes a
> > breeze. With ZFS (we might see it one day) this be
090322 Francesco Talamona wrote:
> I used LVM paired with soft RAID & when I needed to boot from a liveCD
> I discovered that I had to rebuild the setup by hand.
I recently had a small problem with start-up caused by a PPP glitch
& accessed the box with System Rescue 1.1.0 on a CD.
I was surprised
5 matches
Mail list logo
