Grant Edwards writes:
> On 2010-07-13, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
2. The name you give
"Sans-normal-normal-normal-*-20-*-75-75-*-0-iso10646-1"
looks to be just the suffix did you mean something like
"-unknown-DejaVu Sans-normal...". You don't need to have DejaVu,
>>>
Grant Edwards writes:
> On 2010-07-12, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> 2. The name you give "Sans-normal-normal-normal-*-20-*-75-75-*-0-iso10646-1"
>> looks to be just the suffix did you mean something like
>> "-unknown-DejaVu Sans-normal...". You don't need to have DejaVu,
>> but I wo
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:11:17 + (UTC)
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-07-12, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
> > You don't need to have DejaVu, but I would advise getting either
> > DejaVu or bitstream vera.
>
> I guess I can install more fonts, but I was hoping I could point emacs
> at one of the r
Grant Edwards writes:
> On 2010-07-09, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
Grant Edwards writes:
> Recently emacs (running in X "window" mode) seems to have developed a
> font problem.
>>
>> Perhaps it is a font issue.
>
> Yes, I think it probably is.
>
>> I just did emacs -q (-Q eliminat
Grant Edwards writes:
> On 2010-07-08, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> Grant Edwards writes:
>>
>>> Recently emacs (running in X "window" mode) seems to have developed a
>>> font problem.
>>>
>>> There are two cases where text displays as a mixture of filled and
>>> unfilled rectangles:
>>>
>>> 1) Wh
5 matches
Mail list logo
