Re: [gentoo-user] Re: alsa in-kernel vs. alsa-lib

2008-10-31 Thread Pupino
2008/10/31 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:05:47 +0100, Pupino wrote: > >> But i read this after building alsa-lib: >> * Please try in-kernel ALSA drivers instead of the alsa-drivers ebuild. >> * If alsa-drivers works for you where a recent kernel does not, we want >> *

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: alsa in-kernel vs. alsa-lib

2008-10-31 Thread Iain Buchanan
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: void shameless_plug() { One of the reasons I love Gentoo is because it allowed me to recompile all apps without ALSA support and use OSS (version 4) instead which for me worked much, much better than ALSA. } g++ plug.cpp -o plug plug.cpp:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: alsa in-kernel vs. alsa-lib

2008-10-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:05:47 +0100, Pupino wrote: > But i read this after building alsa-lib: > * Please try in-kernel ALSA drivers instead of the alsa-drivers ebuild. > * If alsa-drivers works for you where a recent kernel does not, we want > * to know about this. Our e-mail address is [EMAIL PROT

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: alsa in-kernel vs. alsa-lib

2008-10-31 Thread Patrick Holthaus
> But i read this after building alsa-lib: > * Please try in-kernel ALSA drivers instead of the alsa-drivers ebuild. > * If alsa-drivers works for you where a recent kernel does not, we want > * to know about this. Our e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * However, if you notice no sound output

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: alsa in-kernel vs. alsa-lib

2008-10-31 Thread Pupino
2008/10/31 Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Joshua Murphy wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Markos Chandras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> From my experience i would recommend to use alsa-in-kernel + alsa-libs + >>> alsa-headers + alsa-utils + alsa-tools >>> >>> This comb