27, 2010 5:16:46 PM
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: State of Radeon drivers
>
>Nvidia's binary can't be compared to ATI's one. The problems you describe are
>ATI-binary specific.
>
>
>And yes the nvidia binary replaces a lot of Xorg stuff, but after some time
>you
27;s proprietary driver.
>
> Ben
>
>
> *From:* App Deb
> *To:* gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> *Sent:* Tue, July 27, 2010 5:29:10 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: State of Radeon drivers
>
> If you are going to use any *nix, nvidia is the best option for years now.
ther components of X and you'll see the full story of nVidia's
proprietary driver.
Ben
>
>From: App Deb
>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>Sent: Tue, July 27, 2010 5:29:10 AM
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: State of Radeon drivers
>
>If you are going to use any
If you are going to use any *nix, nvidia is the best option for years now.
The nvidia closed source drivers are of professional quality and have great
performance. Actually they are the *standard* for graphics in *nix, and many
(professional or not) applications actually support only nvidia.
The a
Am 26.07.2010 01:01, schrieb James:
> Florian Philipp f_philipp.fastmail.net> writes:
>
>
>> I have a quick question: I plan to buy a notebook with an ATI Mobility
>> Radeon HD 4250. How well would that one work? Can I reasonably expect
>> Suspend2Ram, 3d acceleration etc to work stable?
>
> We
Oh yes - considering support time is a really good hint!
Just one thing:
On 07/26/2010 01:01 AM, James wrote:
> http://www.x.org/wiki/radeonhd
The radeonhd driver has been abandoned recently by its last supporter
(Novell), because the "radeon"-driver includes now practically all
features of "rade
6 matches
Mail list logo
