Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Pending layman directory "relocation"

2010-03-02 Thread Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:56:58AM -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: > On 03/01/10 18:09, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:07 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: > > > >>> Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf and change the > >>> locations there. > >> > >> That didn't work for me; the curren

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Pending layman directory "relocation"

2010-03-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:07 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: > > Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf and change the locations > > there. > > That didn't work for me; the current layman script still references the > old location; which is why I added the soft link. You have to set the locatio

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Pending layman directory "relocation"

2010-03-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 01 March 2010 22:19:45 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-03-01 1:26 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf > > Also - why /var/lib/layman, and not /var/lib/portage/layman? It looks a > little odd just dumped in there all by itself. Becuase layman is not par

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Pending layman directory "relocation"

2010-03-01 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-03-01 1:26 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf Also - why /var/lib/layman, and not /var/lib/portage/layman? It looks a little odd just dumped in there all by itself. -- Charles

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Pending layman directory "relocation"

2010-03-01 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-03-01 2:02 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: > I did; I simply moved the whole layman directory. Works. Yeah, but I didn't start off using layman when I added my first local ebuild a long time ago, so they are not under layman - they are at the same level - ie, /usr/local/portage contains: /app-adm