On Sunday 04 July 2010 05:21:33 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-07-03, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > The computer gods allow me two cock-ups a day. I'm already way over
> > limit and using up half of next week's quota in advance
> >
> > That's what happens when you try to work, answer list mail and
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:19:36 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> Not really. The OP's choice of mail client isn't going to change what
> happens when people reply to his postings. He wants "reply-to" to
> contain his address as well as the list address so that he gets a
> direct response and does
On Friday 02 July 2010 12:38:05 Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> Or is Nicolas looking to reply to everyone when he writes? That would be
> bad, as there are people who prefer to receive messages through the
> list or using NNTP.
I think Nicolas is seeking to get mail to do something it was not designed to
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
Alan McKinnon writes:
On Friday 02 July 2010 12:01:09 Nuno J. Silva wrote:
Is there a way for someone to add another address to Reply-To? (Does the
list management software overwrite the header or just appends its
address?)
Such a way would suit the OP and
On Friday 02 July 2010 12:01:09 Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> Dale writes:
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> >>> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
> >>> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing
> >>> lists I
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing
the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing
lists I use don't do that.
It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it
pe
6 matches
Mail list logo
