Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem

2010-05-24 Thread David Relson
On Mon, 24 May 2010 04:11:45 -0700 walt wrote: > On 05/23/2010 06:26 PM, David Relson wrote: > > On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:01:53 -0700 > > walt wrote: > > > >> On 05/23/2010 09:56 AM, David Relson wrote: > >> > >>> Output of "emerge -d ant-junit" is attached, though I don't > >>> understand what the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem

2010-05-23 Thread Kenneth Prugh
On Sun, 23 May 2010 21:26:29 -0400 David Relson wrote: > I found java-pkg_needs-vm in /usr/portage/eclass/java-utils-2.eclass. > However "equery belongs /usr/portage/eclass/java-utils-2.eclass" > doesn't find an owning package for this file. Do you have this file? > What package owns it? It's pa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem

2010-05-23 Thread David Relson
On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:01:53 -0700 walt wrote: > On 05/23/2010 09:56 AM, David Relson wrote: > > > Output of "emerge -d ant-junit" is attached, though I don't > > understand what the additional info means. > > The 'build.log' should contain the actual error message following the > test for the s

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem

2010-05-23 Thread David Relson
On Sun, 23 May 2010 18:16:53 +0300 Arttu V. wrote: > On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote: > > Hi Arttu, > > > > The portage tree is fine, AFAICT. emerge finds the ebuild, but > > the emerge fails. Removing "--jobs 4" doesn't change the result. > > Ok, then that could be discarded as just some wild

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem

2010-05-23 Thread Arttu V.
On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote: > Hi Arttu, > > The portage tree is fine, AFAICT. emerge finds the ebuild, but > the emerge fails. Removing "--jobs 4" doesn't change the result. Ok, then that could be discarded as just some wild speculation. Next idea, how about just marking a single arch: >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem

2010-05-23 Thread David Relson
On Sun, 23 May 2010 17:32:50 +0300 Arttu V. wrote: > On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote: > > "emerge -qv ant-junit" fails because ant-junit isn't found > > Is your portage tree or the underlying filesystem broken? You use eix, > so what does "eix ant-junit" output? Are there really no versions of >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem

2010-05-23 Thread Arttu V.
On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote: > "emerge -qv ant-junit" fails because ant-junit isn't found Is your portage tree or the underlying filesystem broken? You use eix, so what does "eix ant-junit" output? Are there really no versions of ant-junit available on your system? Also, from your b.g.o repo

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem

2010-05-23 Thread David Relson
Walt and Kenneth, Your help with this problem is appreciated, though the problem still persists. What versions of java do you guys have installed? What does "eselect java-vm list" show on your machines? I'm on AMD64, what architectures are you running? Looking around, /usr/bin/java is a symlin