On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:15:14 -0600
"Paul Hartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Paul Hartman writes:
> >
> >> I accidentally sent this from the wrong email address the first
> >> time, not sure if it went through to the li
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Hartman writes:
>
>> I accidentally sent this from the wrong email address the first time,
>> not sure if it went through to the list so I'm sending it again (I
>> apologize if it is a duplicate).
>
> I don't think so.
Paul Hartman writes:
> I accidentally sent this from the wrong email address the first time,
> not sure if it went through to the list so I'm sending it again (I
> apologize if it is a duplicate).
I don't think so.
> If anyone has any ideas at all about how to go about fixing/mounting
> this, I
On 9 Dec 2008, at 17:49, Paul Hartman wrote:
...
xfs_repair exists, but the man page says it can only be used against
clealy unmounted drives... which seems kind of funny. I ran it anyway,
in read-only mode, and it was unable to find the primary superblock
and started scanning the disk for the s
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:49:03 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> When I run "less -f /dev/sdf1" i can see amongst the bits all of the
> names of my directories and files etc... so I am pretty sure the data
> is there and readable, but I can't figure out how to get XFS to go
> ahead and mount it so I can c
5 matches
Mail list logo